so you're fine with insider trading then?Never said otherwise. Why do you think I have?
Professional IS personal.
You still don't get it. Capitalism is not selfish.
so you're fine with insider trading then?
Insider trading is not capitalism. Redefinition fallacy.so you're fine with insider trading then?
its mixing the professional and the personal as you prefer.Insider trading is not capitalism. Redefinition fallacy.
but we have it, ergo what we have is not capitalism, but a mix of oligarchy and corporatism, or fascism, internationalist fascism, to be more descrptive.Insider trading is not capitalism. Redefinition fallacy.
I prove it here every single day.I'm sure that you believe you are... Keep thinking that way...![]()
Yes...you do..you just did again...wow...super impressive are you...I prove it here every single day.
It's hard for a Democrat to do poorly in a poll that isn't a poll, but is nothing more than a DNC press release that is called a "poll."It is hard to lose if you get 50% of the vote, especially in a a three way race.
ExactlyShe doesn't understand what she hears. So she turns to some right wing media to TELL her what she heard, and then nods her head knowingly and breathlessly comes and repeats it here. The best way to expose those types of lazy, low information posters is to ask them to clarify. When you do that, they panic. When teach panics, she ups the passive aggressive. These are the easiest tells in the world. I've taken to pushing for specifics for a couple of reasons. First, that should be the type of exchange that would make sites like this more valuable, and second, that discussion quickly separates serious posters from trolls. Top is obviously a troll. As trolls go, she is incredibly annoying, which I suppose is what a troll is shooting for.
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency.its mixing the professional and the personal as you prefer.
Assumption victory fallacy.I think I won this thread already.
Inversion fallacy. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!all you have is word games and denial and silly bullshit.
Corporations are not fascism. Redefinition fallacy. International trade is not fascism. Redefinition fallacy.but we have it, ergo what we have is not capitalism, but a mix of oligarchy and corporatism, or fascism, internationalist fascism, to be more descrptive.
Assumption of victory fallacy.QED.
mate.
but corporations controlling government is fascism.Corporations are not fascism. Redefinition fallacy. International trade is not fascism. Redefinition fallacy.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
you're still doing it, dumbass.Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency.
Assumption victory fallacy.
Inversion fallacy. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
Corporations are not fascism. Redefinition fallacy.but corporations controlling government is fascism.
Your can't read and inadvertently build strawmen based on your dumb.
please stop.
Inversion fallacy. DON'T BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ANYBODY ELSE!you're still doing it, dumbass.
macro conditions matter, felcher.
Macro conditions matter.Inversion fallacy. DON'T BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ANYBODY ELSE!
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. No definable question.Macro conditions matter.
why does everyone talk about it all the time, jackass?
No corporations and government working together with a complicit media is fascism. It is what we have now.but corporations controlling government is fascism.
Your can't read and inadvertently build strawmen based on your dumb.
please stop.
the media is an effective part of the fascism for sure.No corporations and government working together with a complicit media is fascism. It is what we have now.
If someone is stupid they are stupid. Gender has nothing to do with it.Wow. That's some textbook misogyny right there.
She is actually infinitely more qualified than the TV show host was when he ran in 2016. She has a list of accomplishments and a resume that makes her much more qualified for the Presidency than almost any Republican candidate in modern history.
Calling her a "DEI hire" is not only lazy - it's racist, and misogynistic. And I'm not one to cry "racism" at every turn. But there really isn't another word for it, given her qualifications for the office - which are indisputable. You can disagree w/ her on issues and policy, but there is nothing about her resume that makes her a "DEI hire." I mean, what would you call Trump in 2016? He had zilch on his resume that was relevant to the job.