8 point Obama bounce?

[evince]

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/an-8-point-convention-bounce-for-obama/262135/

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Conservatives will declare it's meaningless...

 

[evince]

just like they pretend there is fraud where no fraud exsists and that the CBO and others are wrong on the stimulus

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

the whole article you linked to spends time talking about how it's not an 8 point bounce. do you even read the stuff you post?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

just like they pretend there is fraud where no fraud exsists and that the CBO and others are wrong on the stimulus

Let's be fair.

Don't conservatives swear by CBO projections when the numbers go their way?

 

[evince]

and that is the opinion of the writer.

did you notice the question mark on my thread title?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

the whole article you linked to spends time talking about how it's not an 8 point bounce. do you even read the stuff you post?

Another person who doesn't know what a question mark means?

 

[evince]

Let's be fair.

Don't conservatives swear by CBO projections when the numbers go their way?

Of course they do.

they only recognise facts that they can use to justify their failed ideas

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

and that is the opinion of the writer. did you notice the question mark on my thread title?

Conservatives tend to miss those kinds of details in their dash to debunk and deny.

Then, when they realize how foolish they look, they declare that you "inferred" something that you really asked about.

 

[zappasguitar]

just like they pretend there is fraud where no fraud exsists and that the CBO and others are wrong on the stimulus

Sounds just like something the liar Yurt would say.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Sounds just like something the liar Yurt would say.

Who?

 

[evince]

when you see cons defending spending a bunch of tax dollars on a problem that has no evidence it exsists it makes you wonder wether they are serious about not wasting tax payer money

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

when you see cons defending spending a bunch of tax dollars on a problem that has no evidence it exsists it makes you wonder wether they are serious about not wasting tax payer money

They only want to cut spending on things they don't like, don't they?

 

[evince]

yes like acess to the polls of people they dont like

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

so i can just make a thread with a question mark and pretend that I am not inferring anything. Come on desh... you are smarter than that.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

yes like access to the polls of people they don't like

But there's lots of fraud that needs to be stopped, isn't there?

 

[evince]

yes and it involves woirking to keep people from voting

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Conservatives tend to miss those kinds of details in their dash to debunk and deny. Then, when they realize how foolish they look, they declare that you "inferred" something that you really asked about.

Boom!

Right on cue:

so i can just make a thread with a question mark and pretend that I am not inferring anything. Come on desh... you are smarter than that.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

LMAO

great thread

 

[USFREEDOM911]

and that is the opinion of the writer.

did you notice the question mark on my thread title?

You're lucky that JPP doesn't ban liars, like USMB does, or you wouldn't be allowed to post here either.