A bigger fish from Cohen tapes

Flash said:
How can it be unconstitutional when it is required by the 5th Amendment for federal (felony?) indictments?

If there is not enough evidence for legitimate legal charges the jury will not convict (and it is unlikely the prosecutor will even proceed with the case)
Click to expand...

are you coming to your senses?
 
Trumpy is toast folks


republicantards will try to kill us when trumpy falls



I hope the police don't have to blow too many of them away
 
Flash said:
I am just stating basic constitutional law (like I have in many posts). Maybe you are just coming to your senses :innocent:

I would love to see you without all that hate and hostility.
Click to expand...

when we kill all the traitors I will calm down
 
RB 60 said:
No, they can't convict, but they can recommend an indictment without enough evidence to press legal charges. I've seen it happen.
Click to expand...

Isn't that a big waste of time, unless they are just trying to get the defendant to provide information?

But I don't think that makes it unconstitutional.
 
Flash said:
I am just stating basic constitutional law (like I have in many posts). Maybe you are just coming to your senses :innocent:

I would love to see you without all that hate and hostility.
Click to expand...

I have seen you deny facts before dude
 
evince said:
fuck you
Click to expand...

You are what you decry bub, just the other side of the coin. Obama also took Bush's 2 wars to 7 and put into place all the structural components that allowed Don to continue separating families at the blessed border. Had a cabal of Goldman Sachs execs in his white house too; same as it ever was, same as it is now.
 
evince said:
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-07-25/new-cohen-recording-surfaces-a-bigger-catch
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Weisselberg isn’t a bit player in Trumplandia and his emergence on the Cohen-Trump recording – as someone possibly facilitating a scheme apparently meant to disguise a payoff – should worry the president. Weisselberg has detailed information about the Trump Organization’s operations, business deals and finances. If he winds up in investigators’ crosshairs for secreting payoffs, he could potentially provide much more damaging information to prosecutors than Cohen ever could about the president’s dealmaking.
 
RB 60 said:
Grand Juries are as unconstitutional as it gets. Prosecutors use liars and bullshit to convince a "jury" to hand down indictments, often with the accused not even knowing about it, simply because there is not enough evidence to file legitimate legal charges.
Click to expand...

Write the SCOTUS and inform them of your legal opinion. I'm sure they'll give it all its due consideration.
 
Flash said:
Isn't that a big waste of time? Unless they are trying to get the defendant to provide information.
Click to expand...

Years ago before the company closed, a friend and co-worker was laid off just after he went through a messy and costly divorce. He started to date a coke dealer and went on a coke bender. He was a good guy, never in any trouble. After a few months, he dumped her, quit doing coke and got a good job. Shortly thereafter, she got busted. His phone no. was on her phone records and prosecutors "thought" he was involved in distribution (he just partied, never sold to anyone). Using her lies and the lies of a few others (they never searched his car or home, never found a shred of evidence he did anything at all), the prosecution took this case to a Grand Jury, they handed down an indictment recommending 5 or 6 felony charges. Over a year and a half after he Quit partying and became re-employed, he was arrested. The arrest cost him his job and he couldn't afford to fight the charges, so he pled to 2 of them and spent 3 or 4 months in jail. He got out and has been gainfully employed ever since and has never done any drugs since the time he spent with that whore.
Now, tell me this was right. (BTW, we're still friends).
 
RB 60 said:
Years ago before the company closed, a friend and co-worker was laid off just after he went through a messy and costly divorce. He started to date a coke dealer and went on a coke bender. He was a good guy, never in any trouble. After a few months, he dumped her, quit doing coke and got a good job. Shortly thereafter, she got busted. His phone no. was on her phone records and prosecutors "thought" he was involved in distribution (he just partied, never sold to anyone). Using her lies and the lies of a few others (they never searched his car or home, never found a shred of evidence he did anything at all), the prosecution took this case to a Grand Jury, they handed down an indictment recommending 5 or 6 felony charges. Over a year and a half after he Quit partying and became re-employed, he was arrested. The arrest cost him his job and he couldn't afford to fight the charges, so he pled to 2 of them and spent 3 or 4 months in jail. He got out and has been gainfully employed ever since and has never done any drugs since the time he spent with that whore.
Now, tell me this was right. (BTW, we're still friends).
Click to expand...

you are a fucking liar

why should we believe that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top