A divided nation asks: What's holding our country together?

Dutch Uncle said:
Define "black". Anything less than lily white?
Click to expand...


jesus1.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Be honest: it's the 'roids making you this way. Did you wife kick you? Is that why you are so angry and lonely?
Click to expand...




lol, my wife? I thought you said I had a husband you homophobic piece of shit, anyway, my wife would choke you to an inch of your life..... fake marine.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyril_Burt


Cyril Burt was an admired scientist in his day

He died in the late 1970s after being born in the late 1800s


All those historical figures who believed his work were basing their views on race in what they believed was science


It turned out the fuck faked his research asshole


That means those people thought they were following science


They were instead taking the word of a fucking lying racist


Making them not racists

If they had known the real facts they would have not believed him


If you believed the world was flat because the prevailing science said it was flat and unbelieved it the second science figured it was bullshit


You were not a flat earther we


See how that works
 
Last edited:
evince said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyril_Burt


Cyril Burt was an admired scientist in his day

He died in the late 1970s after being born in the late 1800s


All those historical figures who believed his work were basing their views on race in what they believed was science


It turned out the fuck faked his research asshole


That means those people thought they were following science


They were instead taking the word of a fucking lying racist


Making them not racists

If they had known the real facts they would have not believed him


If you believed the world was flat because the prevailing science said it was flat and unbeliever it the second science figured it was bullshit


You were not a flat earth we


See how that works
Click to expand...

You mean like all those believers of Lewontin's fallacy?

What about Goulds mismeasures of man which shows racial hierarchy in cranial capacities from Morton's collection.

Although some are saying Morton measured better than Gould.

What about Jared Diamond?

He says because Europe was close to Mid East cultures like Sumerian.

That they developed it on.

But, actually similar applies to Chinese being close to Indus valley.

Also North & West Africa aren't exactly far from Egypt & Nubia.
 
evince said:
They believed that asshole racist liar idiot
Click to expand...

Why did people believe Lewontins fallacy?

What about the Flynn effect?

First found by Richard Lynn but got snubbed because of being Politically incorrect.

Truth is there might be minor faults .

But educational PISA scores, and IQ scores by Becker & Rindermann all are saying similar.

Why is that!?
 
evince said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2011/06/gould-morton-revisited/amp


More faked science idiot
Click to expand...

Mismeasure’s Critics

Many scholars have criticized The Mismeasure of Man periodically throughout its 38-year history. For example, James T. Sanders stated that Gould’s attempt to link his argument to anti-racism was a ploy to smear intelligence scholars and Gould’s enemies as evil people. Arthur Jensen argued in 1982 that Gould misrepresented Jensen’s ideas and often demolished strawmen that no intelligence scholar believes, including the boogeyman of “biological determinism.” John Carroll showed that Gould understood neither the purpose nor interpretation of factor analysis (a statistical procedure often used to evaluate data from psychological tests) and that Gould’s attacks on factor analysis do nothing to alter the importance of intelligence tests, nor the mass of evidence—impossible to dispute—that they predict real-life outcomes.

Most criticism of The Mismeasure of Man was confined to the recherché world of psychologists who study intelligence. However, a new debate opened up in 2011 when a team of anthropologists argued that Gould’s analysis of the data on cranium measurements from 19th century scientist Samuel George Morton was flawed. Gould cast Morton as a racist who fudged his data to match his beliefs about white racial superiority because of a supposed larger skull capacity. Instead, the anthropologists argued, it was Gould who manipulated the data to support his biases.

This ignited a series of follow-up articles in the scholarly literature by authors taking a variety of positions regarding Morton’s data and Gould’s interpretations. Weisberg believed that the re-analysis was flawed and Gould was mostly correct. Kaplan and his colleagues claimed that Morton’s interpretations were flawed, but that Gould was incorrect in believing that he could discern Morton’s actions and motivations. Finally, Mitchell believed that Morton’s data were accurate and that the interpretations were colored by the racism of the era, but the claim that Morton subtly manipulated the data was a fiction created by Gould.

Though still unresolved, the debate shows that a critical analysis of specific sections of The Mismeasure of Man is warranted. After writing an article about Lewis Terman, an important developer of early intelligence tests, I decided that a 23-page section of The Mismeasure of Man would be a valuable section of the book to analyze. This section is Gould’s description and analysis of the Army Beta test, one of the tests that Terman helped create. The Army Beta was used in World War I to screen illiterate recruits for military service.


Having read some of the primary scholarly work about the Army Beta, I knew that some of Gould’s claims were inaccurate. However, I was unprepared for the level of pervasive deception that I encountered when I carefully checked Gould’s claims against the historical record. Moreover, I discovered overwhelming evidence that any pretense of Gould being “objective”—even if defined as “fair treatment of data”—is a farce. In The Mismeasure of Man, Gould elevates his biases to the status of uncontestable facts and to great lengths to hide the truth from his readers.


Army Beta examinees during World War I. The other three images are of examiners giving instructions and demonstrating how

https://quillette.com/2019/03/19/the-mismeasurements-of-stephen-jay-gould/
 
Bull&Terrier said:
lol, my wife? I thought you said I had a husband you homophobic piece of shit, anyway, my wife would choke you to an inch of your life..... fake marine.
Click to expand...

Oh, my mistake. You're the wife, he's your husband. Sorry, all this millennial gender shit confuses me. My mistake.

Nice job dodging the steroid thing. Are you saying you're just naturally an raging ass-roid?
 
evince said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyril_Burt


Cyril Burt was an admired scientist in his day

He died in the late 1970s after being born in the late 1800s


All those historical figures who believed his work were basing their views on race in what they believed was science


It turned out the fuck faked his research asshole


That means those people thought they were following science


They were instead taking the word of a fucking lying racist


Making them not racists

If they had known the real facts they would have not believed him


If you believed the world was flat because the prevailing science said it was flat and unbelieved it the second science figured it was bullshit


You were not a flat earther we


See how that works
Click to expand...



This guys lies were not discovered until nearly 1980 asshole


All the shit you are referring to crumbled on the discovery of the lies of this evil racists fucking crap

Buy a clue shit stick
 
evince said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2011/06/gould-morton-revisited/amp


More faked science idiot
Click to expand...

So, PISA scores are fake?

Oh, yeah?

Let me guess whimpering turds think it's so unfair because sniff inequalities are mean.

Well you jerks never cared my Poles were called Dumb Polaks for decades.

Why should I care about you?

Especially when modest income Poland is scoring a high PISA score?
who
Poland survived Nazis killing up to 3 million Polish Catholics before becoming a Soviet vassal until 1989.

Gee, let me ask you why Dominican Rep is doing so poorly on PISA scores?

Did they go through in terms of genocide & Communism in the 20th century?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Oh, my mistake. You're the wife, he's your husband. Sorry, all this millennial gender shit confuses me. My mistake.

Nice job dodging the steroid thing. Are you saying you're just naturally an raging ass-roid?
Click to expand...



I wouldn't do steroids. I'm big into brazillian jiu jitsu for over 15 years and steroids would fuck that shit up with decreasing my old ass flexibility. that said you seem fixated on who is gay or not. Maybe just come out of the closet, fake marine, I mean look at you, you look like the d00d from wham george michael making every other post about who is gay or that you are a heterosexual.


Just come out of the closet bro, I'd respect you more.
 
RomanDmowski said:
Mismeasure’s Critics

Many scholars have criticized The Mismeasure of Man periodically throughout its 38-year history. For example, James T. Sanders stated that Gould’s attempt to link his argument to anti-racism was a ploy to smear intelligence scholars and Gould’s enemies as evil people. Arthur Jensen argued in 1982 that Gould misrepresented Jensen’s ideas and often demolished strawmen that no intelligence scholar believes, including the boogeyman of “biological determinism.” John Carroll showed that Gould understood neither the purpose nor interpretation of factor analysis (a statistical procedure often used to evaluate data from psychological tests) and that Gould’s attacks on factor analysis do nothing to alter the importance of intelligence tests, nor the mass of evidence—impossible to dispute—that they predict real-life outcomes.

Most criticism of The Mismeasure of Man was confined to the recherché world of psychologists who study intelligence. However, a new debate opened up in 2011 when a team of anthropologists argued that Gould’s analysis of the data on cranium measurements from 19th century scientist Samuel George Morton was flawed. Gould cast Morton as a racist who fudged his data to match his beliefs about white racial superiority because of a supposed larger skull capacity. Instead, the anthropologists argued, it was Gould who manipulated the data to support his biases.

This ignited a series of follow-up articles in the scholarly literature by authors taking a variety of positions regarding Morton’s data and Gould’s interpretations. Weisberg believed that the re-analysis was flawed and Gould was mostly correct. Kaplan and his colleagues claimed that Morton’s interpretations were flawed, but that Gould was incorrect in believing that he could discern Morton’s actions and motivations. Finally, Mitchell believed that Morton’s data were accurate and that the interpretations were colored by the racism of the era, but the claim that Morton subtly manipulated the data was a fiction created by Gould.

Though still unresolved, the debate shows that a critical analysis of specific sections of The Mismeasure of Man is warranted. After writing an article about Lewis Terman, an important developer of early intelligence tests, I decided that a 23-page section of The Mismeasure of Man would be a valuable section of the book to analyze. This section is Gould’s description and analysis of the Army Beta test, one of the tests that Terman helped create. The Army Beta was used in World War I to screen illiterate recruits for military service.


Having read some of the primary scholarly work about the Army Beta, I knew that some of Gould’s claims were inaccurate. However, I was unprepared for the level of pervasive deception that I encountered when I carefully checked Gould’s claims against the historical record. Moreover, I discovered overwhelming evidence that any pretense of Gould being “objective”—even if defined as “fair treatment of data”—is a farce. In The Mismeasure of Man, Gould elevates his biases to the status of uncontestable facts and to great lengths to hide the truth from his readers.


Army Beta examinees during World War I. The other three images are of examiners giving instructions and demonstrating how

https://quillette.com/2019/03/19/the-mismeasurements-of-stephen-jay-gould/
Click to expand...



Yes shit stick


More fucking lies


Buy a clue
 
Bull&Terrier said:
I wouldn't do steroids. I'm big into brazillian jiu jitsu for over 15 years and steroids would fuck that shit up with decreasing my old ass flexibility. that said you seem fixated on who is gay or not. Maybe just come out of the closet, fake marine, I mean look at you, you look like the d00d from wham george michael making every other post about who is gay or that you are a heterosexual.


Just come out of the closet bro, I'd respect you more.
Click to expand...


When are you and Dutch going to stop swinging your dicks around like idiots?
 
evince said:
This guys lies were not discovered until nearly 1980 asshole


All the shit you are referring to crumbled on the discovery of the lies of this evil racists fucking crap

Buy a clue shit stick
Click to expand...

When will we say the same about Stephen Jay Gould!?

He was clever in deducing that Neoteny appears to correlate with Human evolution.
Congrats.

But, he admitted Neoteny was not equal, and that East Asians were the most Neotenic of the races.

But, it somehow didn't matter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top