A dream of Rune's

Rune said:
No, I am a teetotaler.

There was nothing false about my logic. If there was, it should be simple for you to illustrate it.
Click to expand...
More false logic. It's easy to break a glass, not so easy to piece it all back together. Sometimes you just have to reject the argument in kind.
 
Right said:
More false logic. It's easy to break a glass, not so easy to piece it all back together. Sometimes you just have to reject the argument in kind.
Click to expand...

So again, your only proof is your declarative statement, in other words you have no proof.
 
Rune said:
I didn't make any accusation at all, I merely pointed out an inaccuracy in a comment.
You have done nothing to prove me incorrect.
Click to expand...

Oh really?

Rune said:
...Therefore this often used talking point is incorrect and only goes to show the concrete in a box style of thought that conservatives are known for.
Click to expand...

Again, I don't need proof, since you made the initial accusation.
 
Rune said:
I looked at all the poster's sigs, avatars, etc. in this thread and didn't see any of them labelled as any given party at all. For example, what party am I a member of?
I then checked the member handbooks of all possible relevant parties and the only one with instructions on how to properly insult opponents was the GOP, in fact I couldn't even find a handbook (or even a list of talking points) for the liberals, the progressives, the Democrats, the Green Party, the Socialists, the Libertarians, the Independents, the Constitution Party, or any party other than the GOP.

Therefore this often used talking point is incorrect and only goes to show the concrete in a box style of thought that conservatives are known for.
Click to expand...

That does explain how you reached your erroneous conclusion; but you left out the part of self declaration, so your entire research was for not and you have FAILED. :D
 
Right said:
No. See post 34. That was what initiated my comment to you.

"...the concrete in a box style of thought that conservatives are known for."

Now try and defend it.
Click to expand...

I don't have to defend it, you are the perfect proof of that statement. Good Day Sir.
 
Rune said:
I don't have to defend it, you are the perfect proof of that statement. Good Day Sir.
Click to expand...
Translation: you can't defend it because it is baseless, and it's time to pretend otherwise, take your bat and ball and go home.

LMAO
 
Right said:
1. Again, he admitted it.
2. You can link to this supposed insult; you don't have to repeat it. You're excuse is a bit too convenient.
3. Again, I never claimed Winterborn to be a pedophile. Even my insults to MM never went to the low level that he routinely practiced, yet you apparently have no problem with.
Click to expand...

You're a repulsive liar. It was easy enough to find your posts insulting WB's wife and kids but now I need to shower after reading the filth you've spewed for years. You're a troublemaker, a stalker, and a sanctimonious asshole, plain and simple.

#'s 58, 129, 144.

#'s 8, 13, 19.
 
cuntiefan915 said:
You're a repulsive liar. It was easy enough to find your posts insulting WB's wife and kids but now I need to shower after reading the filth you've spewed for years. You're a troublemaker, a stalker, and a sanctimonious asshole, plain and simple.

#'s 58, 129, 144.

#'s 8, 13, 19.
Click to expand...

Let's look the first one.

I said this: "You should be embarrassed for having such an ugly wife, fantasizing about mine to the point of publicly lying about her, but since your whole presence here is a lie, Solitary, you probably are not. "

In response to Winterborn's sexual insult here: "After reading your thoughts on sex, I can see why your wife would tell me I was the best she ever had."

As I stated previously, I never sank to the level of my opposition. :D
 
Right said:
Let's look the first one.

I said this: "You should be embarrassed for having such an ugly wife, fantasizing about mine to the point of publicly lying about her, but since your whole presence here is a lie, Solitary, you probably are not. "

In response to Winterborn's sexual insult here: "After reading your thoughts on sex, I can see why your wife would tell me I was the best she ever had."

As I stated previously, I never sank to the level of my opposition. :D
Click to expand...

"But- but- but- but-"

You're a liar. You're a stalker. You're vicious and vulgar. You're undiluted filth. Now STFU because you've been exposed.

#26: I didn't attack his wife.
#28: You'll have to remind me on how I attacked Winterborn's wife, because by my memory it never happened.
#39: You can link to this supposed insult; you don't have to repeat it. You're excuse is a bit too convenient.
 
christiefan915 said:
"But- but- but- but-"

You're a liar. You're a stalker. You're vicious and vulgar. You're undiluted filth. Now STFU because you've been exposed.

#26: I didn't attack his wife.
#28: You'll have to remind me on how I attacked Winterborn's wife, because by my memory it never happened.
#39: You can link to this supposed insult; you don't have to repeat it. You're excuse is a bit too convenient.
Click to expand...

26. Not an attack in the way he attacked mine.
28. Ditto.
39. Ditto.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top