What arresting people who are indicted for crimes in the US? What did they call it when they got Noriega? I mean, that was a full invasion into Panama to get Noriega. Like 20,000 troops, etc.
So, hypothetically, if say China decided that the leader of India broke a law in China, let’s say smuggling goods out of China, it would be acceptable for China to abduct the Indian leader?
If we go by the past, we'd puff and moan and the arrest would stand. Shoot, China abducts leaders of other nations (Panchen Lama) and puts them in reeducation camps. We "huff and puff" and make the microphone make noises... but nothing changes.
Panama and were at war when the US took him out, and it was Noriega who declared it, so trying to equate the two is just TDS. Do better.
During the early 1970s, Noriega's relationship with the U.S. intelligence services was regularized. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) placed him on its payroll in 1971, while he held his position as head of Panamanian intelligence; he had previously been paid by U.S. intelligence services on a case-by-case basis
Which doesn't change anything about what I said.
You are missing the point, it is a weak argument that you are doing it “legally,” serving a warrant, “bringing him in,” what one nation’s courts decide doesn’t automatically apply everywhere. He wasn’t arrested, he was snatched
There's a hearing at noon... Now that they've been brought in...
so you just want symbolic gestures - like 25 million dollar bounties on their heads?
What the hell are you talking about?
So putting a bounty on their heads is ok to you - why is that ok, but taking the action the bounty calls for is a bridge too far?
Is it kidnapping or abduction when they bring in a Felon with warrants?
