“A lot more information to come”: Christie predicts more evidence will drop

[LurchAddams]

"It is a very tight, very detailed, evidence-laden indictment, and the conduct in there is awful," he said. "What I can tell you, for sure I know about that indictment, is there's probably about a third of the evidence they actually have is in that indictment."


"We have now reached a war phase": Even Trump's team fears courthouse protest could be "disaster"
"There will guaranteed be a lot more. When you're a prosecutor, you never put every card on the table before the trial," Christie added, alleging that Trump is "voluntarily putting our country through this."

"This is vanity run amok. Ego run amok. ... Everyone is blaming the prosecutors. He did this."


Christie also addressed members of the GOP who have accused the Justice Department of weaponizing law enforcement against Trump.

"We're in a situation where there are people in my own party who are blaming DOJ. How about, blame him? He did it," Christie said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...T?cvid=a6af185481b3485e9ae9ff2f7f8d2b83&ei=14

Yep, Christie has decided to take a risk and go a different route from his trumptard counterparts. I don't think for a second that it's anything other than political opportunism with Christie. He was on the trump train through all the other crimes, such as Ukraingate, 1/6-gate, etc. He helped trump prepare for the debate against Biden - which was a total shit show.

Anyway, Christie can bite me.

 

[Uncensored2008]

redstate.com

From the moron who just quoted Raw Sewage as a source....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trumpers should realize Trump is not being charged for the documents he returned, 197 of them, he’s being charged for the ones he retained and tried to hide.

But then, Quid Pro is not being charged for the documents he retained and tried to hide in 7 different locations.

One nation - two VERY different standards of law - Seig Heil.

 

[Jarod]

"It is a very tight, very detailed, evidence-laden indictment, and the conduct in there is awful," he said. "What I can tell you, for sure I know about that indictment, is there's probably about a third of the evidence they actually have is in that indictment."


"We have now reached a war phase": Even Trump's team fears courthouse protest could be "disaster"
"There will guaranteed be a lot more. When you're a prosecutor, you never put every card on the table before the trial," Christie added, alleging that Trump is "voluntarily putting our country through this."

"This is vanity run amok. Ego run amok. ... Everyone is blaming the prosecutors. He did this."


Christie also addressed members of the GOP who have accused the Justice Department of weaponizing law enforcement against Trump.

"We're in a situation where there are people in my own party who are blaming DOJ. How about, blame him? He did it," Christie said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...T?cvid=a6af185481b3485e9ae9ff2f7f8d2b83&ei=14

I thought the same thing, if Smith is smart he only disclosed a portion of the evidence, keeping some powder dry. It will all be released to Trump in the coming month or so, but not necessarily the public.

 

[Phantasmal]

I thought the same thing, if Smith is smart he only disclosed a portion of the evidence, keeping some powder dry. It will all be released to Trump in the coming month or so, but not necessarily the public.

All the legal minds I e read, agree he is saving some of the evidence for the trial.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There is so much evidence your head will spin, audio, video, email, texts and attorneys private notes. You have heard but a small portion.

I'll bet Merrick Himmler has evidence Trump makes Matzo from the blood of black babies - that weren't even sacrificed to Moloch in a holy abortion...

When Trump walks on this - will you support your Reich trying to kill him?

 

[Jarod]

All the legal minds I e read, agree he is saving some of the evidence for the trial.

The Federal Rules are less strict, but generally... you cant use evidence at trial if you didn't share it with the Defendant before trial..

 

[Uncensored2008]

All the legal minds I e read, agree he is saving some of the evidence for the trial.

If this fails - as your last 40,000 attempts to get Emmanuel Goldstein failed - would you support your party assassinating Trump.

If I were Trump's campaign manager - there would be ONE and only ONE message from Trump - "Reelect me and we will return to a single law that applies to all."

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Federal Rules are less strict, but generally... you cant use evidence at trial if you didn't share it with the Defendant before trial..

It's called "discovery."

You really should take a night school class on the basics of law.

Not that we still HAVE law under Xi's Biden Regime, but you could do a better job of pretending.

I mean, I'm a Logistician - and know VASTLY more about law than you...

 

[Earl]

Hillary is just an excuse you use, she never came anywhere close to Trumps crimes

They were no where close.

Hillary used a non-secure server to store classified documents. She violated a subpoena by destroying her hard drive and using a hammer to destroy her cell phones.

She is guilty of obstruction of Justice.

Trump did not destroy evidence.

 

[floridafan]

They were no where close.

Hillary used a non-secure server to store classified documents. She violated a subpoena by destroying her hard drive and using a hammer to destroy her cell phones.

She is guilty of obstruction of Justice.

Trump did not destroy evidence.

Not a single document on Mrs Clinton’s computer had any classified markings. That is why your Justice Dept didn’t prosecute. Furthermore Trump asked his people to either hide or destroy documents. We don’t have an answer to that yet.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

the link clearly states that some of the documents bore such markings

My post contained that marking as well. Does that make my post classified? How do you know if there is no header on the document stating it is classified? How do you convince a jury that everyone should know that (c) means something is classified? Willful intent means you need to prove the person accused knew, not someone else knew.

 

[zymurgy]

My post contained that marking as well. Does that make my post classified? How do you know if there is no header on the document stating it is classified? How do you convince a jury that everyone should know that (c) means something is classified? Willful intent means you need to prove the person accused knew, not someone else knew.

derp derp