a new tactic in the fed war on med mj

i'd turn you question around, and ask how you can vote for someone who continually lies, drones the fucking planet at will, has no other idea but "stimulate" ( and add debt) -says adding public sector jobs (while they are jobs,don't create more wealth.)
Appointed Bowles-Simpson, then ignored it, can't lead his own party.


Uses the Commerce Clause to pass a HC bill, that i'm fairly sure will be struck down -because Congress has the power to tax, but didn't want it to be a taxation law ( instead of using enumerated powers of taxation), can't do much STILL, except blame Bush
Destroyed Libya, lied abot UN "leading" ( no. US led-only powers left GB. France. and USA form that co-alition.) backed a bunch of thugs from east Africa with ties to AQ.

Sorry i'm not a partisian sheeple, I ain't voting for Romeny, or Obama as the "lessor of 2 evils" ( even that is questionable given perpetual war).

Go ahead and vote the duopoly, then wonder why in the heck we get the same old tired "blame game", while nothing gets done.

In the final analysis, I don't vote for Unitary presidents, not Cheney/ not Obama. I vote the best man/person that's Gary Johnson (IMHO)

Apparently you didn't read or understand what I said. Sorry you don't understand.
 
Proof that AG Holder lied to congress?

http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/15/definitive-proof-that-eric-holder-lied-t

Just to review, here's what Holder told the House Judiciary Committee:



Asked about what critics have charged is an overly aggressively enforcement campaign and broken administration promises — including in states that have legalized cannabis for medical purposes — Holder denied the charge.

"This is inconsistent with the little thing called the facts," Holder said in testimony in front of the House Judiciary committee.

Holder told the committee that the Justice Department is not using "limited resources to go after people acting in conformity with state law."

"One has to deal with the reality that there are certain people who took advantage of the state law and a different policy that this administration announced...and have come up with ways they are tkaing advantage of those state laws and going beyond what those states have authorized," Holder said.

Now it's being pointed out that DOJ has threatened to prosecute state employees who comply with their states' marijuana laws:



U.S. Attorneys have threatened state governors that the Justice Department would prosecute state employees who are carrying out state law.

In June 2011, the threats were so real they worried New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (R), a former U.S. Attorney himself.

In Delaware, this spring U.S. Attorney Charles Oberly, III, threatened to prosecute state employees while state officials were developing the regulations to fine tune the state law. In that case the Justice Department was trying to prevent any possibility that anyone could be in "conformity" with state law! Governor Jack Markell actually stopped state employees from going forward in the regulation writing process.

In the adjacent state of Maryland, Gov. Martin O'Malley was so alarmed by Oberly's threat, he announced, before the General Assembly could even mark-up a bill in committee, that he would veto any bill that was sent to him!

Last September, the BATF, a unit of the Justice Department, advised all federally licensed firearms dealers that it would be a crime if they sold a firearm to anyone they knew was a state-licensed medical marijuana patient.

how many dems in congress will defend holder over this like they are over fast and furious???
 
Back
Top