Ok, you don’t trust the FBI to police themselves.
You might as well come out and say they’re corrupt lol.
Not what I said liar.
You are making claims, prove your fucking claims
Ok, you don’t trust the FBI to police themselves.
You might as well come out and say they’re corrupt lol.
Trump & his surrogates have engaged in a coordinated effort to completely undermine the FBI as well as our intel community, because of his ego.
So, let's start w/ an honest premise.
Sounds like you're just trying to be snarky.
If you want to engage in any serious discussion on the topic, just let me know.
you haven't seen bogus FISA applications supported by the Steele dossier, yet you believe them to be above board.Mostly because we have seen no evidence against him you retard.
He won't lose his pension, that's just more bullshit. It just means he can't take it at 50, how bloody sad. Can you tell any sector of private industry where you can take a pension at such a ridiculous early age anyway?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Blinders much?
If you can't see it, I can't help you. He has done everything he can to undermine & discredit these agencies since taking office. Wake up.
Your claim is that the FBI called for McCabe's firing.
Your claim refers to texts about a sitting POTUS.
I need citations.
you haven't seen bogus FISA applications supported by the Steele dossier, yet you believe them to be above board.
Your outrage is selective and partisan
They have done what they're supposed to do. If an agent or employee acts unethically, they have taken action.
What Trump has done to try to tarnish the reputation of these vital agencies is disgraceful for a sitting President. Stop making excuses for his behavior.
I’m here to have one.
The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.
According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.
It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.
Again, you putrid stain, what is there to applaud?
fucking moron
yeppers..I’m here to have one.
The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.
According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.
It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.
They didn't fire Mcabe you lying meat popsicle.
Sessions fired Mcabe.
I’m here to have one.
The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.
According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.
It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.
Sounds like you're just trying to be snarky.
If you want to engage in any serious discussion on the topic, just let me know.
The FBI isn't polite, retard.
If he lied, they would have said so.
You make his tweets on the subject sound much more specific and rational than they have been.
It's extremely dishonest. Or, you're just in denial about what he has written.
ah. so you don't see the OPR's exact recommendations ( summarized by Sessions in his firing statement) yet you know they must be questioned, yet you willingly swallow the fact the FISA applications were 100% above board without seeing them.No I don't and will not until I see them, unlike you who just connects the dots.