A Sad Premise Being Realized

What a prescient post, given the recent school shooting since you wrote it. We value fucking guns more than we do our children. This is not a good species survival mode.
you could also say, and it would be more true, is that we value our government agents and politicians more than we do our kids.
After all, we protect our politicians with guns
we protect our banks with guns
we protect our valuable property with guns
we protect our government buildings with guns
but we protect our kids with a 'no guns allowed' sign
 
you could also say, and it would be more true, is that we value our government agents and politicians more than we do our kids.
After all, we protect our politicians with guns
we protect our banks with guns
we protect our valuable property with guns
we protect our government buildings with guns
but we protect our kids with a 'no guns allowed' sign

As usual the answer to all problems in America is MORE GUNS.

When will you folks start to learn how probability works? Just curious.
 
The term assault rifle has been used since World War II.
AR does not mean 'Assault Rifle'. There is no such term.
Hitler used it in its German form: sturmgewehr. The term assault weapon has been used since the 1970's.
No such thing.
More importantly, we can not bring back the dead by undefining terms.
So why are you playing word games?

Banning guns won't work. All the mass shootings occur in "gun free zones".

We can hide deaths that way, but the dead will still be dead. The same basic concept applies to the mass self killing of the alt right. We can hide their suicides through bad decisions by keeping terms from being defined, but that does not keep them from dying.

In fact, by hiding the deaths, the alt right is keeping us from coming up with a solution, and saving those lives.
Shoot back.
 
AR does not mean 'Assault Rifle'. There is no such term.
First sentence is historically correct, though there is an argument to be made that it has changed what it stands for today. The second sentence is an open lie.

The term assault rifle goes back to World War II. Hitler used to German version of it: sturmgewehr.

No such thing.
It played a major part in WWII, so yes, there is such a thing. Denying it just makes you look stupid.

All the mass shootings occur in "gun free zones".
That is absolutely not true.
 
First sentence is historically correct, though there is an argument to be made that it has changed what it stands for today. The second sentence is an open lie.

The term assault rifle goes back to World War II. Hitler used to German version of it: sturmgewehr.


It played a major part in WWII, so yes, there is such a thing. Denying it just makes you look stupid.


That is absolutely not true.
No such thing, Wally. 'AR' does not mean 'assault rifle'.

BTW, ANY weapon is legal.
 
Other countries have shown limiting weapons, limits deaths and makes the whole country more livable. But gun manufacturers want those profits to stay high. The price of living in fear and having children slaughtered in school was easy for them to make.
 
As usual the answer to all problems in America is MORE GUNS.

When will you folks start to learn how probability works? Just curious.
i'm betting that you were one of those screaming 'follow the science' because your government told you to. so that would mean that you are more inclined to follow government advice and example, correct? So if GOVERNMENT is about more guns when they are threatened, why can't you follow that advice and example?
 
Other countries have shown limiting weapons, limits deaths and makes the whole country more livable. But gun manufacturers want those profits to stay high. The price of living in fear and having children slaughtered in school was easy for them to make.
it's just a shame that they keep you in the dark with their other crime stats, like rape, robbery, assault................but then we all know that you leftists don't really care about people, just getting rid of guns.
 
Other countries have shown limiting weapons, limits deaths and makes the whole country more livable. But gun manufacturers want those profits to stay high. The price of living in fear and having children slaughtered in school was easy for them to make.
And let's not forget the racial/mutual distrust factor in America's near psychotic need for numerous availabilities of guns:

1) When you had droves of Europeans moving in to "settle" the "discovered" land (not the people, just the land), they came across groups of folk who had been here for a LONG time (like a millenium) and had their own ways of doing things and carving out territory. So eventually, conflict was settled with the superior technology (the gun) and a lot of chicanery.

2) Years later, the settlers became colonies, and the colonies got fed up with paying off the cousins in the old country. Divisions were made, you had a revolution, which required everyone keep guns just in case the neighbors got uppity.

3) The settlers had pretty much beaten down the original inhabitants, but their slaves (imported) would be a threat to up and leave for greener pastures or just plain revolt. Thank goodness for the guns to give to organized policing of these people. And then there was that Civil War about slave owners wanting to keep things as is to insure their economic stature. Bang, bang!

So we're scared of each other, everyone is either holding grudges or wanting retribution for generations. So it's not surprising that you get rhetoric in response to repeated and increasing mass shootings.

And the band played on.
 
And let's not forget the racial/mutual distrust factor in America's near psychotic need for numerous availabilities of guns:
Guns are 'racist' now????? Why is owning and shooting guns psychotic?? Do you even know what the word means?
1) When you had droves of Europeans moving in to "settle" the "discovered" land (not the people, just the land), they came across groups of folk who had been here for a LONG time (like a millenium) and had their own ways of doing things and carving out territory. So eventually, conflict was settled with the superior technology (the gun) and a lot of chicanery.

2) Years later, the settlers became colonies, and the colonies got fed up with paying off the cousins in the old country. Divisions were made, you had a revolution, which required everyone keep guns just in case the neighbors got uppity.

3) The settlers had pretty much beaten down the original inhabitants, but their slaves (imported) would be a threat to up and leave for greener pastures or just plain revolt. Thank goodness for the guns to give to organized policing of these people. And then there was that Civil War about slave owners wanting to keep things as is to insure their economic stature. Bang, bang!

So we're scared of each other, everyone is either holding grudges or wanting retribution for generations. So it's not surprising that you get rhetoric in response to repeated and increasing mass shootings.
Shoot back. Oh...you're hoplophobia prevents you from protecting yourself or anyone else.
 
Back
Top