How is {customer who is a pregnant woman} somehow not a proper subset of {customer}?
I have no problem with this part.
Is that an answer?
It is, though it looks like I need to elaborate. You seem to have assumed that I wouldn't agree that a "customer who is a pregnant woman" is a proper subset of a customer. You've made a false assumption.
You still haven't answered the question.
Yes, I have.
What is the answer?
As anyone can see from the nested quotes, I went all the way back to your original question, way back in
post #415. Your question reminds me of the prosecutor who asked a man if he'd stopped beating his wife. If he says yes, it implies he was doing it before. If he says no, it implies he's still beating her. There is no room in a yes or no answer to say "I never beat my wife!".
I had hoped that my initial answer to your question in
post #547 would get you to realize that your question has a false assumption built in. Your response in post #560 suggested to me that you hadn't yet realized this, thus my elaboration on my response in
post #656, wherein I pointed out your false assumption. It appears from your response in
post #677 that you still didn't understand both your false assumption as well as how it makes answering your question akin to trying to answer the prosecutor asking the defendant if he'd stopped beating his wife as your statement that I "still hadn't answered your question" implied that there was a way of actually answering your question that wouldn't imply things that are false. Now, your original question posted way back in
post #415 was a while ago- I saw that I had certainly -responded- to your question and so assumed that this response was an answer. I now think it's more that it was a response.
Anyway, as I just mentioned, I specified where your false assumption is back in
post #556. If you formulate a question that -doesn't- have a built in fallacy, I imagine I would be able to actually answer it instead of just point out that the question itself is flawed.