Good question. Don't expect a coherent intelligent answer from the brainless dumb fuck.Why was the Snyder Act needed?

Good question. Don't expect a coherent intelligent answer from the brainless dumb fuck.Why was the Snyder Act needed?
Were you unable to understand when I explained this to you earlier? The 14th amendment continues the idea that Indians are not citizens by making them a separate class.Why was the Snyder Act needed?
You certainly didn't disappoint when it comes to blabbering and flailing.
Art IV applies to citizens of US states. A person that commits a crime in Texas that is found in California is to be returned to Texas to face prosecution for those crimes according to Art IV.
The fourteenth amendment says a person born in California is a citizen of California.
You argue that a citizen of one state or country is not subject to the laws if they retain their allegiance to where they are citizens.
That would mean a citizen of California can go to Texas, murder multiple people and not be subject to the jurisdiction of Texas since they are not a citizen of Texas under the US Constitution.
Art IV says the Texas is the jurisdiction where the crime occurred.
The 14th amendment says a person who lives in California is not a Texas citizen.
Your position is that a non citizen is not subject to the jurisdiction.
I realize you might have to have the reading comprehension of a 12 year old to see how your logic fails so I'm sure you won't disappoint us again with your response.
Article III certainly applies to foreigners since it specifically mentions them.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Indians were not citizens EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT BORN ON RESERVATIONS. How is that any different from the baby of two Mexicans?Were you unable to understand when I explained this to you earlier? The 14th amendment continues the idea that Indians are not citizens by making them a separate class.
14th Amendment
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.
Were you unable to understand when I explained this to you earlier? The 14th amendment continues the idea that Indians are not citizens by making them a separate class.
14th Amendment
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.
Care to find me the case of someone born off the reservation that wasn't a citizen?Indians were not citizens EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT BORN ON RESERVATIONS. How is that any different from the baby of two Mexicans?
Poopiehead doesn't seem to understand what "Indians not taxed" refers to.Brainless dumb fuck doesn't know what the 14th is saying or why the Snyder Act was passed.
![]()
Another activist judge who doesn't know the Constitution falsely claiming that the Constitution divines birthright citizenship to any baby born regardless of legal status in the US.
Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers
A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship and granted nationwide class certification status to all infants impacted by the order on Thursday.
U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante said he will issue a written ruling by the end of the day further explaining his decision. The injunction also narrows down the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.
![]()
Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers
U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's birthright citizenship ban, ruling that deprivation of citizenship would create irreparable harm.www.foxnews.com
That’s ^ the same empty post as the other’s personal insults bullshit except only in a couple of sentences rather than the same predictable phrasesYou’re spot on, the dems in power know this, but their mindless followers are just bleating along, infected with a terminal case of TDS, that’s rotting their brains. They’re too dim to understand the real endgame, mindlessly marching to their overlords’ tune like sheep begging for a shear. It’s the same old story, just like when their ancestors fought tooth and nail against the Constitution to keep slavery thriving.
In his order, LaPlante ruled that deprivation of citizenship, as held by the 14th Amendment, and changes in long-standing policy would create "irreparable harm."
This is a dumb lie not based on the law and purely emotional pabulum.
No, prior to the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, Native Americans born off the reservation were not automatically considered U.S. citizens, though some could attain citizenship through other means. The 1924 Act granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the U.S., regardless of their reservation status. https://www.google.com/search?q=wer...wwT8e58QUAeDs8ME_HuQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8Care to find me the case of someone born off the reservation that wasn't a citizen?
If you bother to read the actual cases you will find plenty of history of Indians being citizens prior to the Snyder act.
Also Reservations are owned by the United StatesCare to find me the case of someone born off the reservation that wasn't a citizen?
If you bother to read the actual cases you will find plenty of history of Indians being citizens prior to the Snyder act.
Poor TD doesn't understand the Supreme Court ruling.
How can a judge be activist if he acts in the way the Supreme Court told him to act? Was the conservative majority on the Supreme Court activist?
Can you provide an actual source that isn't AI generated and uses actual court cases to support your position?No, prior to the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, Native Americans born off the reservation were not automatically considered U.S. citizens, though some could attain citizenship through other means. The 1924 Act granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the U.S., regardless of their reservation status. https://www.google.com/search?q=wer...wwT8e58QUAeDs8ME_HuQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
LINK to this moronic dumb lie, you brainless dumb fuck.Care to find me the case of someone born off the reservation that wasn't a citizen?
If you bother to read the actual cases you will find plenty of history of Indians being citizens prior to the Snyder act.
Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid when they know they have lost an argument.Poopiehead doesn't seem to understand what "Indians not taxed" refers to.
Sad mental case doesn't have the slightest clue what he is whining about.
The Supreme Court told him that illegals who drop a baby here, while breaking our laws, that their babies become citizens automatically? LINK to that stupid nonsense brainless wonder dunce.
And they are generally not subject to state laws.Also Reservations are owned by the United States
gib•ber•ish (ˈdʒɪb ər ɪʃ, ˈgɪb-)That’s ^ the same empty post as the other’s personal insults bullshit except only in a couple of sentences rather than the same predictable phrases
Can you provide an actual source that isn't AI generated and uses actual court cases to support your position?