Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
Correction: Activist judges shouldn’t OBSTRUCT the will of the people

Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people

Our Founding Fathers created a system of checks and balances that serves as the foundation of our great American republic. While our founders envisioned the elected executive and representative branches as driving our republic, we have seen a giant shift in power to the unelected judicial branch and bureaucrats.

President Donald Trump’s November victory was the first step in restoring balance and order once again. Trump was chosen to break the mold, to challenge the entrenched powers, and to steer the country in a direction that better reflects the wills of the American people. But there is a significant hurdle standing in his way: judges who have used their position to undermine the will of the voters and the president’s agenda.

The will of the voters is clear. We’ve demanded change and an end to the status quo that has dominated Washington, D.C., for decades. For far too long, power in America has concentrated in two areas: the courts and the bureaucracy. This trend has persisted across administrations, both Democratic and Republican, and it has left citizens wondering who really holds the power in this nation. Is it the elected representatives of the people, or is it the judges and bureaucrats who seem to make decisions far outside the scope of their original mandate?

Trump was elected precisely to challenge these entrenched elites and bring real change to Washington. He has the strength and courage to push back against the elite political class to bring much-needed change to our government. But too often, Trump’s efforts have been blocked by judges who have overstepped their bounds and allowed their personal agendas to interfere with necessary policy changes.

The role of federal judges should not be to set foreign policy or to dictate how the president can enforce immigration law. The courts should respect the boundaries of their authority and allow the executive branch to carry out its constitutionally mandated duties. Instead, we see the continued safety risk to the American people that weak immigration law has caused.


 
One particularly egregious example is Judge James Boasberg, who has repeatedly ruled in a manner that not only undermines the president’s efforts to safeguard the American people but also goes against the law and the popular will of the people. Over 77 million Americans voted for Trump; no one voted for Boasberg to be making decisions about our national security. Rulings such as these are an abuse of power and a threat to our democratic process.

We cannot afford to sit idly by while the judiciary undermines the will of the people and jeopardizes our safety. If judges such as Boasberg continue to abuse their power and act in contravention of the law, we should not hesitate to remove them.
 

Trump fights dozens of lefty judges — as cowardly Supreme Court dithers

President Donald Trump is striking back at the litigation-industrial complex’s war against his agenda.

On Monday, Trump’s Justice Department filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to take a stand on the “epidemic” of national injunctions — more than 70 and increasing daily — that leftist district court judges are using to tie the president’s hands.

Only the Supreme Court can stop this “power grab,” Trump’s lawyers said.

The success of his presidency could hinge on whether the court will act. The justices have dithered too long.

Trump’s attorneys made their initial “emergency” request for relief from nationwide injunctions on March 15.

Since then the high court has shown only shameful, cowardly inaction.

Dozens of federal judges are blocking core policies — downsizing government, ending DEI, shrinking foreign aid, eliminating transgenderism in the military, deporting Tren de Aragua and more — that voters chose when they elected Trump.

A cadre of leftist lawyers and judges is getting away with negating the November election.

Four justices are already on the record against national injunctions, including Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito.

Chief Justice John Roberts has the votes. He needs to put aside his distaste for Trump’s rhetorical indiscretions regarding the judiciary — and act to protect both the Constitution and the outcome of the November election.

In Monday’s emergency application, acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris challenged a San Francisco district-court judge’s injunction preventing federal offices in all 50 states, including the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Treasury and Commerce, from making workforce reductions.

In February, as downsizing began, government unions and nonprofits sued in the Northern District of California, notorious for its leftist bias.
 

Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people​


The ' Will of the people ' can only be judged by referenda, dumbass. Your mental gearbox needs an overhaul.

Haw, haw..............................................haw.
 
Back
Top