Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
It's a question.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Can't or won't answer it?No, it's a buffoonish strawman.
Only low IQ, uneducated morons demand answers to brainless strawman claims. I prefer to point at brainless morons like you and laugh.
^^^AProudLeftyWashington Examiner.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Explain to the forum what a referendum is, dumbass . Not a reeferendum.What a brainless, uneducated, worthless piece of human excrement this dumbass is.
Haw, haw...........................................haw.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
This is incorrect. Activist judges should not have the power to act as political executives and legislators. That is, they should not be able to make law out of thin air nor should they be able to set the nation's political policy and agenda. That's what they're doing more and more of.Correction: Activist judges shouldn’t OBSTRUCT the will of the people
Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people
Our Founding Fathers created a system of checks and balances that serves as the foundation of our great American republic. While our founders envisioned the elected executive and representative branches as driving our republic, we have seen a giant shift in power to the unelected judicial branch and bureaucrats.
President Donald Trump’s November victory was the first step in restoring balance and order once again. Trump was chosen to break the mold, to challenge the entrenched powers, and to steer the country in a direction that better reflects the wills of the American people. But there is a significant hurdle standing in his way: judges who have used their position to undermine the will of the voters and the president’s agenda.
The will of the voters is clear. We’ve demanded change and an end to the status quo that has dominated Washington, D.C., for decades. For far too long, power in America has concentrated in two areas: the courts and the bureaucracy. This trend has persisted across administrations, both Democratic and Republican, and it has left citizens wondering who really holds the power in this nation. Is it the elected representatives of the people, or is it the judges and bureaucrats who seem to make decisions far outside the scope of their original mandate?
Trump was elected precisely to challenge these entrenched elites and bring real change to Washington. He has the strength and courage to push back against the elite political class to bring much-needed change to our government. But too often, Trump’s efforts have been blocked by judges who have overstepped their bounds and allowed their personal agendas to interfere with necessary policy changes.
The role of federal judges should not be to set foreign policy or to dictate how the president can enforce immigration law. The courts should respect the boundaries of their authority and allow the executive branch to carry out its constitutionally mandated duties. Instead, we see the continued safety risk to the American people that weak immigration law has caused.
Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people - Washington Examiner
But too often, Trump’s efforts have been blocked by judges who have overstepped their bounds and allowed their personal agendas to interfere with necessary policy changes.www.washingtonexaminer.com
Some judge: I don't like and agree with what Congress and the President are doing. I rule that their actions are illegal and unconstitutional and this is the policy that MUST now be followed...
moon
Satire for Sanity
Creepo doesn't know what a referendum is. ^
or
Creepo realises what a referendum is and doesn't want to admit that he's being lampooned for posting drivel
Haw, haw................................haw.
Hmm.. Suddenly TD thinks we no longer live in a Republic.Correction: Activist judges shouldn’t OBSTRUCT the will of the people
Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people
Our Founding Fathers created a system of checks and balances that serves as the foundation of our great American republic. While our founders envisioned the elected executive and representative branches as driving our republic, we have seen a giant shift in power to the unelected judicial branch and bureaucrats.
President Donald Trump’s November victory was the first step in restoring balance and order once again. Trump was chosen to break the mold, to challenge the entrenched powers, and to steer the country in a direction that better reflects the wills of the American people. But there is a significant hurdle standing in his way: judges who have used their position to undermine the will of the voters and the president’s agenda.
The will of the voters is clear. We’ve demanded change and an end to the status quo that has dominated Washington, D.C., for decades. For far too long, power in America has concentrated in two areas: the courts and the bureaucracy. This trend has persisted across administrations, both Democratic and Republican, and it has left citizens wondering who really holds the power in this nation. Is it the elected representatives of the people, or is it the judges and bureaucrats who seem to make decisions far outside the scope of their original mandate?
Trump was elected precisely to challenge these entrenched elites and bring real change to Washington. He has the strength and courage to push back against the elite political class to bring much-needed change to our government. But too often, Trump’s efforts have been blocked by judges who have overstepped their bounds and allowed their personal agendas to interfere with necessary policy changes.
The role of federal judges should not be to set foreign policy or to dictate how the president can enforce immigration law. The courts should respect the boundaries of their authority and allow the executive branch to carry out its constitutionally mandated duties. Instead, we see the continued safety risk to the American people that weak immigration law has caused.
Activist judges shouldn’t block the will of the people - Washington Examiner
But too often, Trump’s efforts have been blocked by judges who have overstepped their bounds and allowed their personal agendas to interfere with necessary policy changes.
In a republic, the courts enforce the Constitution even if it goes against the will of the people or the majority of the politicians.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Dutch Uncle.Washington Examiner.
Indeed.
You're much more than just a creep. You're a terrorist hugging, brain dead repugnant lying leftist and worthless piece of human excrement.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
What part of the Constitution is Trump not following?
Why are you appealing to a document that you despise?
The courts did not enforce the Supreme Court ruling that Biden had no Constitutional authority to forgive student loans, Pobre.
I doubt that you even know what that means halfwit.
No, they don't. They interpret the laws.
Once more you're evidence of how badly our educational establishment has failed us and what an uneducated dumbass you are.
The Constitution doesn't go against the will of the people you brainless twit, it protects them from the Government and clearly defines the roles of the Government and separation of those roles.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Aw, I've aroused your impotence.You're much more than just a creep. You're a terrorist hugging, brain dead repugnant lying leftist and worthless piece of human excrement.
Haw, haw..................................................haw.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
No they don't. "Keeping abortion legal" doesn't mean unfettered abortion up until the moment of birth (or even AFTER!). Unfettered abortion is an extremely unpopular position, but the one that Demonkkkrat politicians wish to shove down everyone's throats.