Adm. Alvin Holsey resigned over Hegseth's Venezuela boat strike orders

@T. A. Gardner proves what an empty shill she is by saying even though they all said the same words, what Pete and Bondi said is ok because she reads a different intent behind what the Dem's meant and the Dems need to be punished for that intent she assumes.

She ignores no one is responsible for what others 'assume they mean' as opposed to what they actually said and she also ignores Pete Hegseth's comments were SPECIFICALLY about Trump giving illegal orders to the military. NO assumption needed as Hegseth speaking to a potential Trump future Presidency says over and over after Trump says 'his military will follow his illegal orders' that they 'will not follow the unlawful orders from the Commander in Chief' as he continues to call Trump a Paper Tiger who never served.
All of JPP's MAGAt Karen retards are liars, hypocrites and domestic enemies of the Constitution. They openly support the overthrow of our Republic and our Constitution in favor of an autocracy led by Donald Trump and his oligarchs.

While observations of them indicate most of their beliefs are based upon fear, cowardice, selfishness and either dementia or plain stupidity, this does not negate their collective danger to our Republic and our Constitution.
 
All MAGAt cracker retards believe what they are told to believe by their draft-dodging, oath-breaking Pedo President. They should all be treated like domestic enemies of the Constitution.
MENTAL CASE ALERT!!!

200.webp
 
you notice how @T. A. Gardner , @RB 60 , @Damocles , @FastLane have nothing to say when it is magats such as Pete Hegseth, and Pam Bondi, two of the top in Trump admin saying the EXACT SAME THINGS as the Dems said that this group lost their shit over.

But we can expect and bet on their hypocrisy as Pete Hegseth continues to try and find a way to punish those who were in the military and said the same basic thing he has said but a tamer version.
.....BUT TRUMP!!!!.....dontchyaknow......
haha.gif
 
So you agree there is nothing wrong with her saying that "the military would not carry out an illegal order by the POTUS... and they are required not to do so"?

You agree this is a correct thing to say and not just for the single instance you like but for any such illegal orders?
Has anyone said otherwise other than lunatic leftist Democrats with their collective heads shoved up their collective asses? :palm:
 
No you are simply lying, as always.

The statements made were a general caution in this exact same way and less of a direct comment than the one Hegseth made where he called Trump a paper tiger for saying the military would follow his illegal orders.

What you do not get to do is 'read between the lines' and pick out YOUR OWN context for what they said and attribute it to them. They either said a thing or they did not.

That you are saying is 'my read is they replied' as a reason to say something is wrong or punishable is so absurd it is stupid.

Can i tell you what you just implied? Is my opinion of your implication something you should be punished for?
:lolup: This is your tiny brain on unhinged sociopathic liar. Don't be one. ;)
 
Hypocrisy is a vital part of being a MAGAt Leftist racist cracker retard.

FIFY brainless wonder dunce.

Whiskey Pete is refusing to release the video tape of the Double-Tap strike because he knows it's proof of a war crime.

No. But then, you're an unhinged, uneducated brainless, lying dumbass on steroids.

He's too fucking stupid to realize that as soon as he's out of office, that video will see him in court. His best way out is a bottle of booze and a .45. :thup:

Wrong. But then, when is an unhinged, uneducated brainless, lying dumbass on steroids ever right about anything? :dunno:
 
@T. A. Gardner proves what an empty shill she is by saying even though they all said the same words, what Pete and Bondi said is ok because she reads a different intent behind what the Dem's meant and the Dems need to be punished for that intent she assumes.

She ignores no one is responsible for what others 'assume they mean' as opposed to what they actually said and she also ignores Pete Hegseth's comments were SPECIFICALLY about Trump giving illegal orders to the military. NO assumption needed as Hegseth speaking to a potential Trump future Presidency says over and over after Trump says 'his military will follow his illegal orders' that they 'will not follow the unlawful orders from the Commander in Chief' as he continues to call Trump a Paper Tiger who never served.
200.webp
 
RB, it is impossible to say this to you in a way you can comprehend so no answer can help you.

I will repeat the below and make certain key words REALLY BIG, to help you focus, as they answer your question.

But at the same time if i could bet every penny i had on you not understanding it, i would make that bet in a heart beat as we know you still will not understand it after reading the BIG words again.


Core Principles Taught at Military Academies​



  • Obligation to disobey unlawful orders
    • Following an illegal order is itself a crime
    • I was just following orders” is not a legal defense
  • Individual criminal responsibility
    • Service members are personally accountable under:
      • Military law (e.g., UCMJ)
      • Domestic criminal law
      • International humanitarian law (Law of Armed Conflict)
  • Manifestly unlawful orders standard
    • You are expected to refuse orders that are clearly illegal on their face, such as:
      • Killing wounded or surrendering enemies
      • Targeting civilians or civilian objects
      • Torture or cruel treatment
      • Rape, looting, or collective punishment
  • Orders you must question
    • Orders that:
      • Violate Rules of Engagement (ROE)
      • Conflict with the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)
      • Seem outside the issuing commander’s authority

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So re read your question RB and then read the words (focus on "YOU" and "I") and ask yourself who the above Code of Conduct is referring to and it will answer your question. You just will not understand it as the poorly educated.
1766506021078.png
 
@RB 60 read what i provided above and came up completely blank when he tried to comprehend what it meant. He simply could not understand who the 'you' and 'i' were referring to and why they are told they MUST refuse illegal orders.

RB still does not understand why they teach that in Military Academies and thinks it is wrong to teach and tell enlisted people that.

it is a problem many of the 'poorly educated' have and why Trump loves them. It is similar to trying to teach calculus to a 5 year old, which is why, even as RB reads this post he still cannot understand it.
 
Back
Top