Admit it. Republicans have broken politics.

I was trying to be 'relatable' to our older participants here. :cool:


Damn Jack you say but it was the Democrats that fostered segregation and were anti civil rights??? Then you say but we haven't used that term in decades so it appears you are the one lost in the 50's.
 
I was trying to be 'relatable' to our older participants here. :cool:


Damn Jack you say but it was the Democrats that fostered segregation and were anti civil rights??? Then you say but we haven't used that term in decades so it appears you are the one lost in the 50's.

goodexcuse1.JPG


:cool:
 
Why/how was that good?

Because society does better when there is less racial and ethnic diversity. When a society is multiracial or multiethnic, people are less trusting of each other, they self-segregate, they spend less time outside, take less risks, and fight over representation, and so on.

When a country is mostly homogeneous, it's easier to form one coherent and trusting community.
 
Quote Originally Posted by MASON View Post
1% owning 90% is the very definition of fascism.

it fascinates me when ignorant people make up their own memes...........fascism is state ownership......that would be the exact opposite of what you said......
 
it fascinates me when ignorant people make up their own memes...........fascism is state ownership......that would be the exact opposite of what you said......

Technically, you're right. However, in practice, there isn't much difference between the state owning everything and the 1% owning everything. The latter isn't Fascism, but it's still a small elite controlling the country.
 
You pointed out lamely how you thought the Democrats were anti free speech, anti freedom of expression and anti free press. Your words:

"Democrats oppose free speech (Antifa), freedom of religion, and a free press (when that press does not agree with their extreme leftist ideology."


I pointed out the instances where President Trump was anti free speech, anti free press, and anti free expression. I could have pointed out the Muslim travel ban as an example of being anti freedom of religion but thought I had made my point (clearly I had).

That you’re cheering his “weaponization the DOJ” is probably not a great thing. But then again, being a patriot is believing in the nation and it’s tenants. Trump supporters have given up on that a long time ago. Nuance and details are far too complex for the President; one should not expect his supporters to be more learned than their messiah.

:laugh: As asked....when do these logical fallacies end? You have "subjectively" with nothing but ad hominem communication declared the Constitution fascist in nature by comparing the Constitutional Authority granted to the POTUS as some imagined form of fascism. Nothing you mentioned that our president has ordered as the Commander in Chief, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Law Enforcement Officer....is not within the defined rights granted to the POTUS in Constitutional Declaration.

You have given no objective evidence of our POTUS attempting to limit the speech of anyone.....when one defends themselves from false charges, example when you call someone a TRATIOR on a national news outlet void of any kind of actual evidence (Trump Colluded)….and you tell the accuser to put up or shut up....that is not an attack on free speech its an exercise in the United States Bill of Rights.

When the POTUS uses his executive authority to limit IMMIGRATION....legal or illegal and place certain individuals on a terrorist watch list.....because the terror being demonstrated is exclusive to that one REGION of the world...that is limiting only several nations that are populated via less than 10% of the world population of that particular religious sect....that is not being anti-religious, its being pro self defense as per the articles contained within the United States Constitution and following historical precedents.

The POTUS has every right to regulate IMMIGRATION in limiting it to who he wishes to limit it. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) the court ruled this about immigration and the supposed travel band, "...in light of the congressional and constitutional powers to make polices and rules for the exclusion of aliens (immigrants) ….granted to the President of the Untied States the court concludes that the government reasons as provided via "Executive Order" are FACIALLY (as they appear( LEGTIMATE.

JUST LIKE SCTOUS eventually ruled... shutting up the idiots promoting this logical fallacy....like the 9th circuit court of LEFT COAST LAND.

As far as the press goes......its ceases to be free when its 99% YELLOW JOURNALISM. ;)


Next idiot leftist? :cool:
 
Last edited:
California: "The data demonstrate the sheer immensity of California’s economy, home to nearly 40 million people, a thriving technology sector in Silicon Valley, the world’s entertainment capital in Hollywood and the nation’s salad bowl in the Central Valley agricultural heartland. It also reflects a substantial turnaround since the Great Recession."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...5th-largest-economy-beating-out-uk/583508002/

David Jeffrey Spazz: "Has a 2 Cow 'Dairy Milking Operation' and a few chickens in Hamilton (where ever the fuck that is) and barely scratches out a Living as an overweight, aging, ex-hobo, that never married, and doesn't plan to.
Now, that’s funny.
 
:laugh: As asked....when do logical fallacies end? You have "subjectively" with nothing but ad hominem communication declared the Constitution fascist in nature by comparing the Constitutional Authority granted to the POTUS as some imagined form of fascism. Nothing you mentioned that our president has ordered as the Commander in Chief, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Law Enforcement Officer....is not within the defined rights granted to the POTUS in Constitutional Declaration.
Agreed. He is also within his rights to announce an invasion of Canada tomorrow. Does the fact that he can do it mean that you’ll support it? If you really have a problem with the Democrats supposedly being anti-free speech, anti-religious freedom, anti-free expression and anti-free speech, you’d also have a problem with Trump doing all of the above as well; whether it was in his rights to field these policies or not.

You have given no objective evidence of our POTUS attempting to limit the speech of anyone…..
Yes I do. The non-disclosure agreements he had public employees sign. They work for us, not him.

When the POTUS uses his executive authority to limit IMMIGRATION....legal or illegal and place certain individuals on a terrorist watch list.....because the terror being demonstrated is exclusive to that one REGION of the world...that is limiting only several nations that are populated via less than 10% of the world population of that particular religious sect....that is not being anti-religious, its being pro self defense as per the articles contained within the United States Constitution and following historical precedents. The POTUS has every right to regulate IMMIGRATION in limiting it to who he wishes to limit it. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) the court ruled this about immigration and the supposed travel band, "...in light of the congressional and constitutional powers to make polices and rules for the exclusion of aliens (immigrants) ….granted to the President of the Untied States the court concludes that the government reasons as provided via "Executive Order" are FACIALLY (as they appear( LEGTIMATE.
Basing it on religion is, in fact being anti religious freedom. Persons visiting who live here were barred from re-entry for a while. Those who fought with us in Iraq were barred from immigrating here based on their being Muslim.

The legality is not the question. The act is.

As far as the press goes......its ceases to be free when its 99% YELLOW JOURNALISM. ;)
Total nonsense.
 

The US will never bleed to death...there are some 300 million citizens, 80 million of which are pack'n, (that's some standing Militia)…...THE US will die the same death that all CANCER patients die....slow and agonizing.....from the socialist disease within its body, its already spread to its brain, its just a matter of time until the US becomes another Banana Republic. Maybe not in my lifetime...but soon. When that time comes we can only hope to take out as many of these cancerous cells as we can. Sometimes one requires alternative medicine...if that don't work you just have to put the mad dog down.
 
Because society does better when there is less racial and ethnic diversity. When a society is multiracial or multiethnic, people are less trusting of each other, they self-segregate, they spend less time outside, take less risks, and fight over representation, and so on.

When a country is mostly homogeneous, it's easier to form one coherent and trusting community.

Huh. I don't find that to be particularly good or bad. America sucked for minorities in the 1950s.
 
Agreed. He is also within his rights to announce an invasion of Canada tomorrow. Does the fact that he can do it mean that you’ll support it? If you really have a problem with the Democrats supposedly being anti-free speech, anti-religious freedom, anti-free expression and anti-free speech, you’d also have a problem with Trump doing all of the above as well; whether it was in his rights to field these policies or not.


Yes I do. The non-disclosure agreements he had public employees sign. They work for us, not him.


Basing it on religion is, in fact being anti religious freedom. Persons visiting who live here were barred from re-entry for a while. Those who fought with us in Iraq were barred from immigrating here based on their being Muslim.

The legality is not the question. The act is.


Total nonsense.

More logical fallacies based upon what? Ad hominem Bull Shit? You have presented HYOTHETICAL BULLSHIT....things that have never happened. LMAO. (Why invade Canada...hell we have a standing military that protects their asses so they can spend all their money on social giveaways?) A typical leftist. You think running your jaws is debating. (: When the court rules......that is called a RULE OF LAW. Just like the Rule of Law grants the POTUS the right to ban who he will in immigration policy when there is a national security threat......just like the AG determined within the rule of law....NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION.

And it pisses you off. :bigthink:

Here's a hypothetical for ya: What would happened IF (a frog invaded Canada....and had wings? It would not bump its ass everytime it hopped across the border. Now prove that negative wrong? "IF" is a tool of the lazy minded that can't present FACTS. You can't prove nor disprove that which has never occurred.
 
Last edited:
More logical fallacies based upon what? Ad hominem Bull Shit? You have presented HYOTHETICAL BULLSHIT....things that have never happened. LMAO. (Why invade Canada...hell we have a standing military that protects their asses so they can spend all their money on social giveaways?) A typical leftist. You think running your jaws is debating. (: When the court rules......that is called a RULE OF LAW. Just like the Rule of Law grants the POTUS the right to ban who he will in immigration policy when there is a national security threat......just like the AG determined within the rule of law....NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION.

And it pisses you off. :bigthink:

LOL!

A. You wouldn't know logic if it were sodomizing you.
B. You're not debating
C. The Mueller Report clearly show obstruction. The only thing that stopped charges being brought was OLC policy.
D. Plesae try and eat less shit.
 
Huh. I don't find that to be particularly good or bad. America sucked for minorities in the 1950s.

Yes, which is why I believe in separation, not segregation. Blacks should have been given their own ethnostate carved out of America after they were set free.
However, having a community where people care about each other and will work together to better the country is definitely a good thing. That's one thing the fifties got right.
 
The US will never bleed to death...there are some 300 million citizens, 80 million of which are pack'n, (that's some standing Militia)…...THE US will die the same death that all CANCER patients die....slow and agonizing.....from the socialist disease within its body, its already spread to its brain, its just a matter of time until the US becomes another Banana Republic. Maybe not in my lifetime...but soon. When that time comes we can only hope to take out as many of these cancerous cells as we can. Sometimes one requires alternative medicine...if that don't work you just have to put the mad dog down.

LOLOLOL... OK drama queen.
 
Back
Top