Advise and Consent

blackascoal said:
.. more word salad.

Question: What administration would want to be in Trump's shoes? Lawsuits and investigations up the ass, cronies getting locked up and singing like Beyonce, lowest approval in American history, laughingstock of the entire world, a disastrous midterm staring you in the face ... and here you are talking like you're some sage with all the answers. :0) NO administration ever wants to wear Trump's shoes.

Just about everybody on this side of the fence knew the coming disaster of Trump .. you didn't.

You've been wrong about every fucking thing. Your support of the Nunes Memo alone demonstrates that you really don't know much about politics, even less about society.

You're blind to all the failure around you. Trump failure everywhere and you don't even mention it. :0) Don't worry, we will.
Click to expand...

he knows hes lying every time he does it


if its a russo bot hole maybe not


they can only do what they are programed to do
 
blackascoal said:
.. more word salad.

Question: What administration would want to be in Trump's shoes? Lawsuits and investigations up the ass, cronies getting locked up and singing like Beyonce, lowest approval in American history, laughingstock of the entire world, a disastrous midterm staring you in the face ... and here you are talking like you're some sage with all the answers. :0) NO administration ever wants to wear Trump's shoes.

Just about everybody on this side of the fence knew the coming disaster of Trump .. you didn't.

You've been wrong about every fucking thing. Your support of the Nunes Memo alone demonstrates that you really don't know much about politics, even less about society.

You're blind to all the failure around you. Trump failure everywhere and you don't even mention it. :0) Don't worry, we will.
Click to expand...
gawd you are so far gone I might as well be talking to a Democratic Child
1. why was Nunes incorrect? do you even know? We see evidence that only Steele was relied upon -
despite claims of "multi-sourcing the FISA".. hit me back if you have any other "falsifications" by Nunes

2. then it's back to your babbling about Trump -off target and tangent to this discussion.
Nobodys talking about the Trump adm here -we're talking judges

3. "cronies locked up?" like who? Manafort? even Mueller said the Trump administration had nothing to do with his charges.
the other's are "process crimes" lying to the FBI and such -which would not exist except for Mueller -
no Russian collusion crap .

It's like your mind just throws stuff out without thinking or organizing, and more rhetoric.
Now go ahead and call me a racist like you've done before. idiot.
 
anatta said:
gawd you are so far gone I might as well be talking to a Democratic Child
1. why was Nunes incorrect? do you even know? We see evidence that only Steele was relierd on -despite claims of "multi-sourcing the FISA.. hit me back if you have any other "falsifications" by Nunes

2. then it's back to your babbling about Trump -off target and tangent to this discussion.
Nobodys talking about the Trump adm here -we're talking judges

3. "cronies locked up?" like who? Mana fort? even Mueller said the Trump administration had nothing to do with his charges. the other's are "process crimes" lying to the FBI and such -which would not exist except for Mueller -no Russian collusion crap .

It's like your mind just throws stuff out without thinking or organizing, and more rhetoric.
Now go ahead and call me a racist like you've done before. idiot.
Click to expand...

link to your claims
 
evince said:
he knows hes lying every time he does it


if its a russo bot hole maybe not


they can only do what they are programed to do
Click to expand...

It's truly like they've taken control of his brain. He can't even see elephants standing right next to him.

What happened to him?

The invasion of the body snatchers. They're not human .. and they're already here. :shock:

 
anatta said:
gawd you are so far gone I might as well be talking to a Democratic Child
1. why was Nunes incorrect? do you even know? We see evidence that only Steele was relied upon -
despite claims of "multi-sourcing the FISA".. hit me back if you have any other "falsifications" by Nunes

2. then it's back to your babbling about Trump -off target and tangent to this discussion.
Nobodys talking about the Trump adm here -we're talking judges

3. "cronies locked up?" like who? Manafort? even Mueller said the Trump administration had nothing to do with his charges.
the other's are "process crimes" lying to the FBI and such -which would not exist except for Mueller -
no Russian collusion crap .

It's like your mind just throws stuff out without thinking or organizing, and more rhetoric.
Now go ahead and call me a racist like you've done before. idiot.
Click to expand...

Hopeless. :0) You've even got word salad for the Nunes memo, intergalactic dude that it was. :0)

I don't have to call you anything .. you correctly identified yourself. NOISE.

It's all you have .. and thanks. :0)
 
blackascoal said:
Hopeless. :0) You've even got word salad for the Nunes memo, intergalactic dude that it was. :0)

I don't have to call you anything .. you correctly identified yourself. NOISE.

It's all you have .. and thanks. :0)
Click to expand...
my pleasure.
when you figure out the bogus Russian collusion was a set up; let us know
 
anatta said:
my pleasure.
when you figure out the bogus Russian collusion was a set up; let us know
Click to expand...

:0) The most amazing thing about your delusion is that you can't even see it. Hilarious.

I could slap you again with some facts .. but I'll just enjoy the show. :0) thanks
 
blackascoal said:
:0) The most amazing thing about your delusion is that you can't even see it. Hilarious.

I could slap you again with some facts .. but I'll just enjoy the show. :0) thanks
Click to expand...
knock yourself out.
Keep hoping for that Russian collusion in the meantime, while calling for impeachment because of.......?

are you gonna call for impeaching Kavanaugh as well? why stop with Trump?
 
anatta said:
knock yourself out.
Keep hoping for that Russian collusion in the meantime, while calling for impeachment because of.......?

are you gonna call for impeaching Kavanaugh as well? why stop with Trump?
Click to expand...

Naw .. it's just getting too funny now.

Question: How long did the Benghazi investigation take?

How about 2 years, 4 months .. longer than investigations of 9/11, Watergate, the JFK assassination and Pearl Harbor. Did you complain about how long Benghazi took to come up with NOTHING? Mueller has LOTS to show for his work, and he's not done.

How long has the Mueller investigation taken thus far?

Mueller was appointed May 17, 2017. Far less than 2 years, 4 months. :0) See how easy that was.

.. and if you think I'd call for the impeachment of Kavanaugh, obviously you've missed some my posts. I've already posted on impeaching him for lying to get the job he already has. :0)
 
anatta said:
The Dems are on record they will never ever approve any Trump/Repub judge

Dems are the party of mindless obstructionism. Did anyone notice Lindsey Graham voted for both Kagan and Sotomayor?
It used to be that way. Senators looked at the quality of the individual, not the politics
or not "da resistance".

The reason being they were qualified in Grahams (and others) estimation -
not because he agrees with their ideology.
That's how adults approach the courts. Adults recognize the senate's role is advise and consent.

Children fling innuendo, and stamp their feet that they don't like his political bent
( even though he shows no signs of politics influencing his decisions)

The Dems are like kids that only want to eat their ice cream. they will only approve a judge that meets their taste-
regardless of the fact they don't get to pick. "Elections have consequences" for adults.
For kids -not so much
Click to expand...

Merrick Garland
 
Our illustrious dry drunk SCOTUS nominee

I personally do not want a belligerent dry drunk who shoves his dick in unsuspecting women's faces on the Supreme Court.

Republicans can offer someone better than this.

FBI Reaches Out to Woman who says Kavanaugh Shoved His Cock in Her Face

The FBI has begun contacting people as part of an additional background investigation of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, including a second woman who alleges that the Supreme Court nominee sexually assaulted her, according to people familiar with the unfolding investigation.

The bureau has reached out to Deborah Ramirez, a Yale University classmate of Kavanaugh’s who alleges that he shoved his genitals in her face at a party where she had been drinking and become disoriented, her attorney said Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...09b39c3f6dd_story.html?utm_term=.9ae6c191fb97
Click to expand...
 
blackascoal said:
Naw .. it's just getting too funny now.

Question: How long did the Benghazi investigation take?

How about 2 years, 4 months .. longer than investigations of 9/11, Watergate, the JFK assassination and Pearl Harbor. Did you complain about how long Benghazi took to come up with NOTHING? Mueller has LOTS to show for his work, and he's not done.

How long has the Mueller investigation taken thus far?

Mueller was appointed May 17, 2017. Far less than 2 years, 4 months. :0) See how easy that was.

.. and if you think I'd call for the impeachment of Kavanaugh, obviously you've missed some my posts. I've already posted on impeaching him for lying to get the job he already has. :0)
Click to expand...
lol..of course you are calling for impeachment :palm: -
not understanding that even lying isn't grounds for removal if the SJC and Senate still pass him.

Bengazi? WTF does Bengazi have to do with anything? I mean Americans were killed there
but you and I have long held the position that Bengazi happened because of the Libyan war of 2011.
Hiring a bunch of LIFG terrorist to guard Stevens was a sure fire disaster

At least I think that was you? who was hip to the fact Libya became a failed terrorist state because of our killing Qadafi. I'm not sure of anything about you anymore since you threw in with the dems at all costs. Do you even remember this?
 
anatta said:
lol..of course you are calling for impeachment :palm: -
not understanding that even lying isn't grounds for removal if the SJC and Senate still pass him.

Bengazi? WTF does Bengazi have to do with anything? I mean Americans were killed there
but you and I have long held the position that Bengazi happened because of the Libyan war of 2011.
Hiring a bunch of LIFG terrorist to guard Stevens was a sure fire disaster

At least I think that was you? who was hip to the fact Libya became a failed terrorist state because of our killing Qadafi. I'm not sure of anything about you anymore since you threw in with the dems at all costs. Do you even remember this?
Click to expand...

What does Benghazi have to do with Mueller .. I've already said it.

Pretending you didn't read it doesn't actually work.

Did you complain about how long Benghazi took to come up with NOTHING?

Let me guess .. no you didn't.

Easy.
 
reagansghost said:
the righties on this thread are freaking out, know damn well Kav is toast lol
Click to expand...
I still won’t count him out. The Judiciary Committee obviously wasn’t concerned about his lies in the first hearing, so I don’t see how they will be concerned about the discovery in the FBI inquiry. They want this appointment because Kavanaugh won’t allow Trump to be indicted while in office.
 
blackascoal said:
What does Benghazi have to do with Mueller .. I've already said it.

Pretending you didn't read it doesn't actually work.

Did you complain about how long Benghazi took to come up with NOTHING?

Let me guess .. no you didn't.

Easy.
Click to expand...
you said nothing, and nobody was even talking about the length of Mueller
Also you seem to forget a counter-esipionage investigation was started by Srzok back in July of 2016-
which Mueller subsumed. not counting any informants that were run at Trump before that also. add in those times

I've said a 100 times Bengazi was the symptom,but the disease was the US/NATO/Hillary war-
also on a bogus "intelligence" of cell phone coverage on CNN.

Starting a fucking war by CNN coverage - and you want to talk about Trump's Russian collusion? get outta here.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
The Dems are on record they will never ever approve any Trump/Repub judge

Dems are the party of mindless obstructionism. Did anyone notice Lindsey Graham voted for both Kagan and Sotomayor?
It used to be that way. Senators looked at the quality of the individual, not the politics
or not "da resistance".

The reason being they were qualified in Grahams (and others) estimation -
not because he agrees with their ideology.
That's how adults approach the courts. Adults recognize the senate's role is advise and consent.

Children fling innuendo, and stamp their feet that they don't like his political bent
( even though he shows no signs of politics influencing his decisions)

The Dems are like kids that only want to eat their ice cream. they will only approve a judge that meets their taste-
regardless of the fact they don't get to pick. "Elections have consequences" for adults.
For kids -not so much
Click to expand...

2j1kie.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top