African-American claims "stand your ground"; convicted anyway

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
bravo said:
The prosecutor must be pretty good......jury had a verdict in 12 minutes or something?
Click to expand...

You love to see black women going to jail for 20 years for firing a warning shot to a man who beat her, while openly rooting for the guy who murdered a 17 yo black kid to go free don't you bravo?

Do you type these posts with both hands on the key board? Because I highly doubt that.
 
different cases, entirely different circumstances. It's foolish to compare them.

And for everyone that is saying they are the same thing: why defend this woman and not defend zimmerman?

You guys want to have your cake and eat it too. You can't have it both ways. You can't say they are the same, and defend this woman while condemning zimmerman.

So you're choices are either

A) admit these cases are different circumstances and can't be compared
B) continue your claim that this is an identical case to the trayvon martin shooting, in which case why aren't you flocking to defend zimmerman as you are defending this woman?

Pick one.
 
Darla said:
You love to see black women going to jail for 20 years for firing a warning shot to a man who beat her, while openly rooting for the guy who murdered a 17 yo black kid to go free don't you bravo?

Do you type these posts with both hands on the key board? Because I highly doubt that.
Click to expand...


wtf does her race have to do with what I posted.....???? or the Zimmerman case....

12 minutes to get a verdict is pretty telling, don't you think.....?
 
KingofOwls said:
different cases, entirely different circumstances. It's foolish to compare them.

And for everyone that is saying they are the same thing: why defend this woman and not defend zimmerman?

You guys want to have your cake and eat it too. You can't have it both ways. You can't say they are the same, and defend this woman while condemning zimmerman.

So you're choices are either

A) admit these cases are different circumstances and can't be compared
B) continue your claim that this is an identical case to the trayvon martin shooting, in which case why aren't you flocking to defend zimmerman as you are defending this woman?

Pick one.
Click to expand...

Of course this is all ludicrous. THis man has an admitted history of beating this woman, and EVERY WOMAN he was ever involved with.

Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else.

Looks like someone needs to take a good look inside to see what's going on. Is racism affecting your view of this grind? That's something you may want to check. You're not an old, bitter, twisted up fart like Bravo whose life is over anyway and who spends his time surrounded by other old bitter twisted up old farts at the Knights of Columbus bingo marathons.
 
Darla said:
Of course this is all ludicrous. THis man has an admitted history of beating this woman, and EVERY WOMAN he was ever involved with.

Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else.

Looks like someone needs to take a good look inside to see what's going on. Is racism affecting your view of this grind? That's something you may want to check. You're not an old, bitter, twisted up fart like Bravo whose life is over anyway and who spends his time surrounded by other old bitter twisted up old farts at the Knights of Columbus bingo days.
Click to expand...


"Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else."....................so whats your point ?

Zimmerman had no history of shooting people either....

Bingo ? K of C ?....wtf are you ranting about ?......you sound like an idiot gone psycho.......
 
Darla said:
Of course this is all ludicrous. THis man has an admitted history of beating this woman, and EVERY WOMAN he was ever involved with.

Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else.

Looks like someone needs to take a good look inside to see what's going on. Is racism affecting your view of this grind? That's something you may want to check. You're not an old, bitter, twisted up fart like Bravo whose life is over anyway and who spends his time surrounded by other old bitter twisted up old farts at the Knights of Columbus bingo days.
Click to expand...

please don't reduce yourself to this level of calling me a racist just because we disagree. I dont think it's that crazy to think that if one leaves their house, and then they come back and pick up a gun, they can't claim that they are in fear of their life. I also believe you are being biased to assume that she definitively fired a "warning shot" when in actuality she probably just missed, as well given that her two children were in that room, shows how mentally unstable this woman was.

We don't know what happened in the zimmerman case, and I have always maintained that if new evidence comes to light, I will change my opinion on it, but right now I don't think the prosecution can meet their burden.
 
Darla said:
Of course this is all ludicrous. THis man has an admitted history of beating this woman, and EVERY WOMAN he was ever involved with.

Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else.

Looks like someone needs to take a good look inside to see what's going on. Is racism affecting your view of this grind? That's something you may want to check. You're not an old, bitter, twisted up fart like Bravo whose life is over anyway and who spends his time surrounded by other old bitter twisted up old farts at the Knights of Columbus bingo marathons.
Click to expand...

wow... so anyone who disagrees with you is a racist? How typical of a liberal...
 
Superfreak said:
um... it was his home too... I think the fact that she fired in the direction of two kids is what made the case against her.

That said, the guy admitted to having hit her, so he deserved to be shot.
Click to expand...

It makes no sense to argue this; because all the Liberals have are feelings and feelings have nothing to do with facts.
She was convicted; because she returned to where he was, after retreiving her handgun, and then shot at him.
You are not allowed to shoot at someone who is no longer, by legal standards, an IMMEDIATE threat.
 
Last edited:
Darla said:
Bullshit she didn't fire at the kids. She fired a bullet into a wall. If she were a white man she'd never have seen the inside of a jail cell. What's more, you know that.
Click to expand...

But then, that's just how you FEEL and you have nothing to support your FEELINGS.
 
Darla said:
Of course this is all ludicrous. THis man has an admitted history of beating this woman, and EVERY WOMAN he was ever involved with.

Martin had no history of beating up Zimmerman or any one else.

Looks like someone needs to take a good look inside to see what's going on. Is racism affecting your view of this grind? That's something you may want to check. You're not an old, bitter, twisted up fart like Bravo whose life is over anyway and who spends his time surrounded by other old bitter twisted up old farts at the Knights of Columbus bingo marathons.
Click to expand...

Speaking of bitter and twisted; you are aware, aren't you, that the guy wasn't on trial?
 
KingofOwls said:
please don't reduce yourself to this level of calling me a racist just because we disagree. I dont think it's that crazy to think that if one leaves their house, and then they come back and pick up a gun, they can't claim that they are in fear of their life. I also believe you are being biased to assume that she definitively fired a "warning shot" when in actuality she probably just missed, as well given that her two children were in that room, shows how mentally unstable this woman was.

We don't know what happened in the zimmerman case, and I have always maintained that if new evidence comes to light, I will change my opinion on it, but right now I don't think the prosecution can meet their burden.
Click to expand...

Your reactions to each of these cases IMO can only be explained by two possible scenarios:

-racism, either conscious or unconscious.

-such a deep hatred of liberals that anything that upsets them gives you pleasure, even if the cost of that pleasure is someone's life.
 
Superfreak said:
wow... so anyone who disagrees with you is a racist? How typical of a liberal...
Click to expand...

I think that anyone who knee-jerked Zimmerman is innocent, which Grind absolutely did, and knee-jerked this woman is guilty, has something going on. Yep. No doubt about that. Not too many explanations either.
 
Darla said:
I think that anyone who knee-jerked Zimmerman is innocent, which Grind absolutely did, and knee-jerked this woman is guilty, has something going on. Yep. No doubt about that. Not too many explanations either.
Click to expand...

Grind most certainly did not kneejerk he was innocent. He did however state (correctly) that many (myself included) knee jerked Zimmerman was guilty well before knowing the facts of the case. You seem to have a truly poor ability to recollect what transpired.

Saying it must be racism is quite simply a cop out on your part. The cases are only similar in that the two defendants tried to claim stand your ground. Stand your ground doesn't work when you leave, come back, grab a gun and shoot. You assume she deliberately fired at the wall. You assume that the kids weren't in danger. You assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a racist.

Lot of assuming on your part.
 
Superfreak said:
Grind most certainly did not kneejerk he was innocent. He did however state (correctly) that many (myself included) knee jerked Zimmerman was guilty well before knowing the facts of the case. You seem to have a truly poor ability to recollect what transpired.

Saying it must be racism is quite simply a cop out on your part. The cases are only similar in that the two defendants tried to claim stand your ground. Stand your ground doesn't work when you leave, come back, grab a gun and shoot. You assume she deliberately fired at the wall. You assume that the kids weren't in danger. You assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a racist.

Lot of assuming on your part.
Click to expand...

You're full of shit. He sure did.

Why don't you go to the link I provided and explain his (AGAIN) insistence that Zimmerman is innocent, and more importantly explain his celebration of the Martin shooting target.

Let me know what you come up with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top