gfm7175
Mega MAGA
It didn't stop... it just wasn't enough to fault the election for President.
After Trump Took the Lead, Election Deniers Went Suddenly Silent...
- Thread starter christiefan915
- Start date
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
Trump said he had proof that it was going on in Pa. But who expects the truth from him?
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
That was entirely due to Ross Perot, dumbass... The entire 10M difference is explained ENTIRELY by Ross Perot ALONE. Those voters of his turned out in 1992, but they didn't bother in 1996. ENTIRELY different circumstances........
You have no other legitimate example of this ever happening in recent history......
“evidence?”if you think the election is rigged, make a claim.
I'm sure your evidence will be considered as well as trump's was.
So if Harris says cheating cost her the election, she says it without submitting any proof, that would be “evidence?”
Here, we’ll save you time (https://apnews.com/article/fact-che...lection-2024-5c92a9b2530232fc8ac80968a1362518), now you can move on to another bullshit conspiracy
As it wasn’t in 2020
As we know, according to MAGA doctrine, “the truth ain’t the truth,” unless Trump says it
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
it depends on the evidence.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Nope. You cannot use fake news as a source with me. I'll stick with logic and mathematics.
81 million votes makes ZERO sense. That means that one is to believe that Biden was even MORE popular than Obama was in 2008. I call BS!
Even in the present day, let alone four years ago, it would take roughly 77 million ballots in order to have an "Obama 2008 performance". This cycle, Trump is likely to end up with roughly 77 million ballots when all is said and done, which is right in line with what I was expecting him to get, and right in line with an "Obama 2008 performance".
A "Hillary 2016 performance" in the present day would be roughly 70 million ballots, which Harris will slightly eclipse when all is said and done (she's at 68M now, and California's remaining vote alone will give her a few million more), so she will end up with maybe a few million more ballots than Hillary, which is reasonable enough (especially if you figure that there's still a fair amount of fraudulent ballots making their way into the system).
An "Obama 2008 performance" in 2020 would've been roughly 75.5M ballots, of which Trump got close to with his 74M. Trump's total makes sense... Biden's total of 81M does NOT make ANY sense at ALL....
BartenderElite
Verified User
I just looked this up.
Literally millions of votes are STILL BEING COUNTED. They anticipate at the end that turnout will on par w/ 2020.
We can revisit this "proof of fraud" in about a week.
What makes you think there wasen't cheating?This is how weird magas are. Even on Election Day trump was screaming about massive cheating in Philadelphia, before the polls even closed. And this after years of frothing about election integrity. Then he took the lead and suddenly the magas set that all that aside. I don't know why. How do we know that millions of illegals didn't vote for him, since he always accuses them of voting for Dems? How can we trust the results now, after years of being programmed that our election system is rotten to the core?
This is just how weird magas are.
After Trump Took the Lead, Election Deniers Went Suddenly Silent
Trump supporters spent years fomenting concern about election integrity. On Tuesday, they set it all aside.www.nytimes.com
BartenderElite
Verified User
What makes you think there was? Why did you think there was in 2020 - because a pathological liar said so?
We have ridiculous checks & balances in our system, and our elections are the most scrutinized in the world. Trump won fair & square - maybe it's time for MAGA to accept that our elections are secure.
Who said there was?
Bullshit. If you want a secure election do It like dozens of 1st world countries.
Photo ID
Machine ballots with paper backup
National holiday weekend voting
No same day registration
No mail-in ballots
I would add a finger dipped in ink following leaving the poll station.
Saying something is not evidence, it is accusation
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
if its testimony it can be evidence.
Ah, you do know that the vote has not been totally completed, and funny how now it is 80 million, elsewhere it was 20
And you wouldn’t believe anything unless Trump told you, if he said he shit gold, you’d believe him, which is why you swallowed the Big Lie, bait, hook, line, and sinker
Just saying people are cheating isn’t testimony
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
it is if it's sworn in and notarized.
Yakuda
Verified User
And? If you think the election was rigged either say something about it or shut up. As late as 2023 that stupid pig Hillary Clinton was still claiming that trump was an illegitimate president. You people can't help yourselves can youThis is how weird magas are. Even on Election Day trump was screaming about massive cheating in Philadelphia, before the polls even closed. And this after years of frothing about election integrity. Then he took the lead and suddenly the magas set that all that aside. I don't know why. How do we know that millions of illegals didn't vote for him, since he always accuses them of voting for Dems? How can we trust the results now, after years of being programmed that our election system is rotten to the core?
This is just how weird magas are.
After Trump Took the Lead, Election Deniers Went Suddenly Silent
Trump supporters spent years fomenting concern about election integrity. On Tuesday, they set it all aside.