Agriculture Secretary - ‘Next Step’ Is to Make ‘Everyone Reapply’ for SNAP to Ensure Integrity

It isn't. Government has a purpose, but it isn't regulating the banks into giving loans that they never would otherwise and causing a collapse. Saying "government is the problem" when speaking about the 2008 mortgage bubble is talking about the one thing, you pretending that it meant more and is a central ideal or something is just building that strawman I talked about earlier.
why did you say it then.

who forced banks to create new products out of bad loans, cajole ratings agencies to stamp them AAA and infect the whole system?
 
libertarians do call for it.

you just did a minute ago.
Exactly what I was talking about you use a purposeful ignorance to build that strawman. You ignore what people say to you after you make absurd claims, ignore the conversation that was taking place to pretend that a statement was made in a vacuum and means what you want it to mean rather than what was explained to you.

You want to argue against an ideal that is not part of the philosophy because it is easier to knock down your own creation than it is to actually use intelligent conversation to make points.
 
American government created by our founders is not the problem now is it

And one time in history that killing government and having YOUR dreamworld of no regulations to protect the people from the wealthy created this dreamworld you insist will emerge?

yes that is effectively where libertarian globalist traitor asshats are now.
There is no in practice example of your idiot claims
 
Exactly what I was talking about you use a purposeful ignorance to build that strawman. You ignore what people say to you after you make absurd claims, ignore the conversation that was taking place to pretend that a statement was made in a vacuum and means what you want it to mean rather than what was explained to you.

You want to argue against an ideal that is not part of the philosophy because it is easier to knock down your own creation than it is to actually use intelligent conversation to make points.
you said government is the problem.

its not a strawman.

your bullshit is just bullshit.
 
why did you say it then.

who forced banks to create new products out of bad loans, cajole ratings agencies to stamp them AAA and infect the whole system?
I actually explained it in context at a later post. Let me get that for you again, maybe the second time you read it you can recognize what was said instead of pretending.
 
They will block them. Or just send them home.

I am all for deporting 14M more illegals. But I think the activist judges and courts will block deportation until the costs of the illegals have bankrupted the nation.

America has a fatal Leftie infestation.

When we rebuild from the ashes, after the collapse-war, we will need the New Constitution to have many provisions to limit Lefties.

-
 
you said "government is the problem."

that basically anarchism, damo, regardless of your top tier hemming and hawing.
You said the above. I responded with the below:
It isn't anarchism, I was speaking to the regulation that caused the problem in a conversation with Desh. Government has a purpose, but it isn't regulating the banks into giving loans that they never would otherwise and causing a collapse. Saying "government is the problem" when speaking about the 2008 mortgage bubble is talking about the one thing, you pretending that it meant more and is a central ideal or something is just building that strawman I talked about earlier.
You ignored what I said and said this:
libertarians do call for it.

you just did a minute ago.
I explained again, like I would with a child, patiently... with this:
Exactly what I was talking about you use a purposeful ignorance to build that strawman. You ignore what people say to you after you make absurd claims, ignore the conversation that was taking place to pretend that a statement was made in a vacuum and means what you want it to mean rather than what was explained to you.

I then noted this:
You want to argue against an ideal that is not part of the philosophy because it is easier to knock down your own creation than it is to actually use intelligent conversation to make points.
You simply rinsed and repeated by restating the lie below:
you said government is the problem.

its not a strawman.

your bullshit is just bullshit.
Then I again responded with this:
I actually explained it in context at a later post. Let me get that for you again, maybe the second time you read it you can recognize what was said instead of pretending.

And here we are again. You building a strawman, proving that you are purposefully ignorant, refuse to take in information, and are incapable of an intellectually honest discussion.
 
I am all for deporting 14M more illegals. But I think the activist judges and courts will block deportation until the costs of the illegals have bankrupted the nation.

America has a fatal Leftie infestation.

When we rebuild from the ashes, after the collapse-war, we will need the New Constitution to have many provisions to limit Lefties.

-
Fuck you racists

I would take in five South American immigrants in trade for every fucking racist like you

Leave America or crawl into the sewer where all racists belong in a free society


It’s too late you racist shut balls

Americans are a mixed up rainbow

You lost already you shit for brains

True Americans hate racists

You are a deadly plague to Americans Freedoms
 
American government created by our founders is not the problem now is it

Government post Wilson and FDR bears little resemblance to the government created by our founders.

And NAME one time in history that killing government and having YOUR dreamworld of no regulations to protect the people from the wealthy created this dreamworld you insist will emerge?

No one seeks no government at all.

You lie about others and them fight your lie.

This is known as a "straw man fallacy."

There is no in practice example of your idiot claims

Are you on a bender again? You're typing nonsense that has no actual meaning.
 
You said the above. I responded with the below:

You ignored what I said and said this:

I explained again, like I would with a child, patiently... with this:
Exactly what I was talking about you use a purposeful ignorance to build that strawman. You ignore what people say to you after you make absurd claims, ignore the conversation that was taking place to pretend that a statement was made in a vacuum and means what you want it to mean rather than what was explained to you.

I then noted this:

You simply rinsed and repeated by restating the lie below:

Then I again responded with this:


And here we are again. You building a strawman, proving that you are purposefully ignorant, refuse to take in information, and are incapable of an intellectually honest discussion.
you shouldn't say "government is the problem" to dog whistle to the other brainless libertarians if you don't mean it.

It IS The governments job to regulate banks.

and who made the banks resell loans they knew were bad and rate them triple aaa and infect the market completely?

and is Tucker racist?
 
you shouldn't say "government is the problem" to dog whistle to the other brainless libertarians if you don't mean it.

It IS The governments job to regulate banks.

and who made the banks resell loans they knew were bad and rate them triple aaa and infect the market completely?

and is Tucker racist?
You shouldn't take something stated in a conversation about government being problematic (pushing regulations that caused a collapse) and assume it is the only thing I have ever said. You are literally purposefully ignoring what was stated so you can build that strawman. You must believe that your arguments are weak if you can only argue against the strawman you create and to do it you must remain purposefully ignorant. Ignorance is not a virtue.
 
Back
Top