Al Gore: Scared to debate climate change

[TheDanold]

It's actually a book, it goes for $20 on Amazon.com...

It speaks of the ability to feed more people because of such things...

It looked fascinating, even if you don't agree with his conclusion.

I'll have to read it. It's ironic the same lefties who are terrified of manmade CO2 do not embrace pesticides because their chief environmental benefit is that they do not require a CO2 emitting tractor to plow over as much land to yield the same amount of produce or grain, because much less of it is lost to bugs.

Lefties call themselves progressives, but anything manmade that was developed for progressive reasons (such as the ability to generate more for less) and they are set against it, nuclear power, pesticides, cell phones, SUVs, bioengineering. So many new things lefties are set against, they are anti-progressive and more like primitive paganists.

 

[Cancel7]

Why does Dano have bac's avatar?

 

[Agnosticus_Caesar]

More bullshit from Dano. It is not reasonable to ask Al Gore to debate the existence, or the effects of greater than average Global Warming with experts. Al Gore is not an expert. He is a politician. Al Gore deserves praise because he brought the issue to the masses, while right-wingers have tried to OBSCURE and DENY it.

Dano, and the people he is hiding behind, are using the same tactic Hannity has been using as of late... Since they cannot attack the overwhelming evidence supporting human caused climate change, they attack the messenger, Al Gore.

THEY THEN ACT AS IF ATTACKING GORE REFUTES HUMAN CAUSED CLIMATE CHANGE.

If these people were TRULY serious about debating human caused climate change, they would challenge CLIMATE SCIENCE EXPERTS, NOT politicians.

The simple fact is, none of them have the balls to do it, as they would have their collective asses handed to them. The very same reason Dano avoids engaging in debate with me.