Are you in the habit of lying or do you simply have a problem with reading comprehension?
1) You stated that Mecca and Medina would "cease to exist" soon after the white house was bombed. True, you did not use any of the phrases "nuke", "nuking" or "vaporized in a fireball of uncontrolled fusion byproducts" but the implication was clear. This is the same wriggly worm-logic by which some children still claim that Dubya didn't lie because he never used the exact word "imminent" during the run up to war.
I don't care whether you want to cause Mecca and Medina to "cease to exist" by means of nuclear explosives or more conventional arms. It's equally immoral either way.
2) Nowhere did I state that it was okay to eliminate the president. Not even this president. Not even Ronald Reagan, whom I consider to have been, quite literally, a traitor to this nation. Here is what I said:
No reasonable person could extract from this that I think it's "okay" to kill the president. It you do then this simply demonstrates that you aren't a reasonable person.