blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Sounds like self-defense to me.
Al-Qaida Calls for Holy War Against Israel...
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Sounds like self-defense to me.
Ah, so preemptive attacks are self-defense? You agree with Bush? Wow, I wouldn't have ever thought that of you...
Seriously, it is not "self-defense" to say you will attack everywhere until your religion is the only one left. That is self-delusional pretense, I don't even know why you are participating in it other than to give AHZ more ammunition stating that "if it had been Muslims, blah, blah, blah... then BAC would be <insert insulting way of saying supportive>..."
Please, your Bush apologist side is showing up.
Unless David Horowitz or Tom Tancredo hacked your account, I can scarcely believe you posted this nonsense. Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas have no designs on invading Denmark, Iceland, or Canada to wipe out christianity, and replace it with one world muslim rule. Neutral countries, or countries that don't interfere in the muslim world don't get attacked. I've never heard of an al qaeda attack on Finland, Sweden, or Chile. I really don't think they are attacking "everywhere".
Note to bush fans: this is not an apology for al qaeda. Its a simple fact.
Except that is what they SAID, my answer was that it SOUNDED like something. His was that is SOUNDED like something else. We were having a conversation about what it "sounded" like.Please, your Bush apologist side is showing up.
Unless David Horowitz or Tom Tancredo hacked your account, I can scarcely believe you posted this nonsense. Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas have no designs on invading Denmark, Iceland, or Canada to wipe out christianity, and replace it with one world muslim rule. Neutral countries, or countries that don't interfere in the muslim world don't get attacked. I've never heard of an al qaeda attack on Finland, Sweden, or Chile. I really don't think they are attacking "everywhere".
Note to bush fans: this is not an apology for al qaeda. Its a simple fact.
Also, my statement was in no way a "support" of preemptive attack, if you took it that way it is because you have reading comprehension problems. And lastly:
At least read the thread before you make such idiotic statements or keep the hell out of the conversation.