Am I correct, the Trumper’s now quietly admit

Courts cannot change election law as happened in Pennsylvania.

That would be outside of the scop of Constitutional authority. Not the same as changing election law.

Bottom line is, there's only one reason Democrats would fight so hard against free and fair elections.
And Michigan and Georgia all were swing states
 
What? I guess you haven't heard about the FBI raid on Fulton County. You should get away from Apple News once in a while.
I know about that, so what? They’ve had five years.

Why has Trump failed to file a lawsuit? He has had five years to do so.

You have zero evidence for your conspiracy theory claims.

Tell me about the aliens at area 51?
 
Should all voters in a state have exactly the same chance to cast a vote? Or should some voters in Democrat areas be given an advantage over Republican areas.
No, we get it. The Repubs should have all the advantages. They already pick their voters with countless voter suppression tactics. 36 states alrteady have voter ID laws.
 
OK so who has authority to change election laws, the state legislatures of the court system?
English, please.

Per the Constitution, the states set the time, date, and manner of elections and how they are held. You MAGATs are desperately trying to change that and federalize them all, which is against the Constitution. It is the duty of the courts to interpret law and issue rulings based on law. It is the duty of SCOTUS to issue final rulings on the constitutionality of law.
 
What? I guess you haven't heard about the FBI raid on Fulton County. You should get away from Apple News once in a while.
Derp Derp Angina
Legina has a vagina


Debunked election claims behind Fulton County search spark new questions for Gabbard​

Democrats are asking new questions about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s presence at the FBI’s recent search of a Georgia voting center after an affidavit showed the federal case relies on widely debunked claims about the 2020 election.

The document, unsealed as part of a court challenge earlier this week, credited Kurt Olsen, an ally of President Trump who was central in his efforts to fight his 2020 election loss, with the referral that sparked the investigation.

“When the nation’s top intelligence official inserts herself into a matter with no connection to a foreign threat, it’s hard to escape the conclusion that the objective was political – namely, getting back into Donald Trump’s good graces – and that her presence was meant to lay the groundwork for baseless claims of foreign interference. Americans should be deeply concerned about what someone with sweeping authority over the country’s intelligence apparatus might do to achieve that.”

Olsen, appointed by Trump to serve as the director of election security and integrity, was the author of one of the petitions Trump wanted Justice Department officials to file challenging the 2020 election. Olsen was present for a meeting in the Oval Office during Trump’s first term where the president pressured Justice Department officials to file the case.

A 2021 report from the Senate Judiciary Committee details Olsen’s multiple efforts to reach Justice Department officials over the brief, with former Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen
saying Olsen was “aggressive” about the matter. The Justice Department concluded at the time there simply was not evidence of widespread fraud that would merit a challenge to the election.
 
English, please.

Per the Constitution, the states set the time, date, and manner of elections and how they are held. You MAGATs are desperately trying to change that and federalize them all, which is against the Constitution. It is the duty of the courts to interpret law and issue rulings based on law. It is the duty of SCOTUS to issue final rulings on the constitutionality of law.
You'll have to wait until Ms. Fat Lame is between meth bowls. :thup:

Agreed. There are some rules on federal elections from Congress, but the MAGAts are trying to justify giving Trump the power to rule over all elections wherever he pleases. This is an authoritarian measure and why all MAGAts are domestic enemies of the Constitution.

After the Day of Rage, America will be free from tyranny. :flagsal:
 
English, please.

Per the Constitution, the states ____ set the time, date, and manner of elections and how they are held. You MAGATs are desperately trying to change that and federalize them all, which is against the Constitution. It is the duty of the courts to interpret law and issue rulings based on law. It is the duty of SCOTUS to issue final rulings on the constitutionality of law.
You forgot the word "LEGISLATURE". Lower Courts lack the authority to alter election laws. In the 2020 election lower courts exceeded their Constitutional authority and changed voter laws in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia .
 
Am I correct now that the Trumper‘s quietly admit that Biden legitimately beat Trump?

If not, how come nobody can come up with any evidence of Significant voter fraud?
using the intelligence apparatus to steal an election isn't really winning fairly

Hunters laptop. phony debates. and so on

the bunker basement method of getting the most votes ever is because of the propaganda arm of the media and technology that is hard to break through - but America proudly did. so if this russia style election system democrats favor is fair - consider me out
 
Back
Top