American Communist Party

goat said:
You're afraid of our fast-changing world. You're as obsolete as an aircraft carrier. All show but easy to sink.
Click to expand...
No I'm not.

I'm for a radical rejection of globalist stupidity.

that's a massive change.

that's the conservative change that is actually happening.

bend over for the trump tariffs, belt and road initiate.
 
you neocons can't stand trump is winning.

you'd rather suck Chinese cock than stay a good american.

you're so bent on globalization you've gone fucking dumb and evil.
 
Last edited:

  1. Neoconservatism - Wikipedia​

    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Neoconservatism
    Today's neocons are a shrunken remnant of the original broad neocon coalition. Nevertheless, the origins of their ideology on the left are still apparent. ... (2008) call Straussian Wilsonianism (or Straussian idealism), the defense of liberal democracy in the face of its vulnerability. ... [Revolutionary Communist regimes] claim jurisdiction ...
  2. en.wikipedia.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Leo Strauss - Wikipedia​

    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Leo_Strauss
    Leo Strauss [a] (September 20, 1899 - October 18, 1973) was an American scholar of political philosophy.Born in Germany to Jewish parents, Strauss later emigrated from Germany to the United States. He spent much of his career as a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, where he taught several generations of students and published fifteen books.
  3. philosophynow.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Leo Strauss: Neoconservative? | Issue 59 | Philosophy Now​

    https://philosophynow.org › issues › 59 › Leo_Strauss_Neoconservative
    The neocon view is that either you're willing to export liberal democracy or it will be crushed by all kinds of barbaric global groups. ... Thus, Straussian teachings do accord with how things have turned out on the domestic and international political fronts for the US: Vigorous defense of a version of liberal democracy; substantial support ...
  4. chroniclesmagazine.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Neoconservatism - Where Trotsky Meets Stalin and Hitler​

    https://chroniclesmagazine.org › web › neoconservatism-where-trotsky-meets-stalin-and-hitler
    As early as 1963 Richard Hofstadter commented on the progression of many ex-Communists from the paranoid left to the paranoid right, clinging all the while to the fundamentally Manichean psychology that underlies both. ... In the Straussian-neoconservative mindset, those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that ...
  5. press.uchicago.edu

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    The Truth about Leo Strauss - The University of Chicago Press​

    https://press.uchicago.edu › Misc › Chicago › 993329.html
    For convenience' sake, let us call these Straussian Wilsonianism (or Straussian idealism), and Straussian Machiavellianism (or Straussian realism). One, for the most part, is meant to explain the genesis and purposes of Bush foreign policy insofar as Strauss's thought has anything to do with it; the other, the justification for the means by ...
  6. jacobin.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Leo Strauss Was a Theorist of Counterrevolution - Jacobin​

    https://jacobin.com › 2024 › 10 › leo-strauss-neoconservatism-plato-elitism
    1 day agoIt forms, as McAllister puts it, "the source for the second modern form of government, communism." Strauss attacks liberalism in this way, only to strike at socialism, which probably most disgusted him, as the supreme form of "mob rule." ... In Straussian terms, this was a "noble lie" — the kind that is still with us. ...
  7. academic.oup.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    The Straussian Approach | The Oxford Handbook of the History of ...​

    https://academic.oup.com › edited-volume › 34508 › chapter › 292802884
    The "Straussian" approach to the history of political philosophy is articulated primarily in the writings of Leo Strauss. Strauss wrote extremely careful, detailed studies of canonical philosophical works along with essays explaining his approach (e.g. Strauss 1952, 1953, 1959, 1983, 1989a, b).The most controversial claim Strauss made was that philosophers in the past did not always ...
  8. link.springer.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    What is Straussianism (According to Strauss)? - Springer​

    https://link.springer.com › article › 10.1007 › s12115-010-9384-5
    The Straussian, apparently, is supposed to be somewhat confused about whether he himself is a philosopher, but he certainly takes pride in knowing much of what philosophers alone know. Finding out, for example, that the philosophers have always been atheists or at least disbelievers in the religion of their time is indispensable for making them ...
  9. academic.oup.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Straussians | Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy ...​

    https://academic.oup.com › chicago-scholarship-online › book › 16150 › chapter › 171195438
    The Straussian philosopher, however, recognizes no such authority, but aims and claims to achieve autonomy or full self-sufficiency. 29 Close. The faith-based Straussians thus break with Strauss, but do so in dialogue with him and in part via the path he has set forth. They rely heavily on his demonstration both of the nature of modernity (as ...
  10. tandfonline.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Leo Strauss and the neoconservative critique of the liberal university ...​

    https://www.tandfonline.com › doi › full › 10.1080 › 17508480701813524
    2. While neoliberalism rests on an ideology of individualism as the most fundamental and unifying premise that emphasises the individual within a free‐market economy and, thereby, defends the notion of the minimal state on moral as well as efficiency grounds, the neoconservative critique of the welfare state aimed at a remoralizing of welfare with greater emphasis on collective (family and ...

More Results
 
Kamala Trump said:
No I'm not.

I'm for a radical rejection of globalist stupidity.

that's a massive change.

that's the conservative change that is actually happening.

bend over for the trump tariffs, belt and road initiate.
Click to expand...
Mike Rowe is about as conservative as you can get, yet he is pro-working class. His interviews go deep into what's wrong with America. Watch Rowe's interview with Riley Gaines. She shows amazing courage by standing up to our corrupt system.
 
goat said:
Mike Rowe is about as conservative as you can get, yet he is pro-working class. His interviews go deep into what's wrong with America. Watch Rowe's interview with Riley Gaines. She shows amazing courage by standing up to our corrupt system.
Click to expand...
he's a platitude salesman.

he's right on men in womens' sports, but wrong on DEI.
 
From Wikipedia

Jackson Hinkle (born September 15, 1999) is an American political commentator and influencer who hosts the web television show Legitimate Targets with Jackson Hinkle on X. He is known for his support of Vladimir Putin in the Russo-Ukrainian War, and for his opposition to Israel in the Gaza–Israel conflict. Hinkle has dubbed himself an "American Conservative Marxist–Leninist", while journalists have described him as conservative, right-wing, and far-right. Promoting a syncretic mix of conservative and communist ideas, he is a self-described proponent of "MAGA communism", calling on those who support the working class to ally with the MAGA movement against an alleged globalist threat. Initially an environmentalist during his high school years, Hinkle has turned to promoting pro-fossil fuels stances in recent years.
 
goat said:
From Wikipedia

Jackson Hinkle (born September 15, 1999) is an American political commentator and influencer who hosts the web television show Legitimate Targets with Jackson Hinkle on X. He is known for his support of Vladimir Putin in the Russo-Ukrainian War, and for his opposition to Israel in the Gaza–Israel conflict. Hinkle has dubbed himself an "American Conservative Marxist–Leninist", while journalists have described him as conservative, right-wing, and far-right. Promoting a syncretic mix of conservative and communist ideas, he is a self-described proponent of "MAGA communism", calling on those who support the working class to ally with the MAGA movement against an alleged globalist threat. Initially an environmentalist during his high school years, Hinkle has turned to promoting pro-fossil fuels stances in recent years.
Click to expand...

his basic populism is good

but he's uneducated on marx and lenin. they were satanic thug anti-humans.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
This guy isn't a real communist in any way, shape, or form.

He's just a pathetic jihadist towel head sympathizer.
Click to expand...
Labor wages in the US used to be coupled with profits. That all ended in the '80s. We all witnessed how fast the U.S. Maritime Alliance gave a 62% wage increase to the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) once they threatened to shut down the supply chain. Why is that?

Workers own their production in Marxism. Zoomers were born into a gig economy in which workers own nothing, they rent everything. It's called neo-feudalism, a step back from capitalism. The upcoming global market collapse is expected to be as bad or worse than 1929. There was a communist party in the US going back to 1848, They're called the Forty-Eighters.
 
goat said:
Labor wages in the US used to be coupled with profits. That all ended in the '80s. We all witnessed how fast the U.S. Maritime Alliance gave a 62% wage increase to the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) once they threatened to shut down the supply chain. Why is that?

Workers own their production in Marxism. Zoomers were born into a gig economy in which workers own nothing, they rent everything. It's called neo-feudalism, a step back from capitalism. The upcoming global market collapse is expected to be as bad or worse than 1929. There was a communist party in the US going back to 1848, They're called the Forty-Eighters.
Click to expand...
No, workers own nothing in Marxism. The government and central committee decide everything. In a Communist economy, the economy increasingly is controlled by a black market. Everyone who can goes around the government, not to or through it, to get things done. The black marketers don't stand in the bread line, they have a connection and get theirs up front. Barter often becomes a staple and way of economic life. Corruption and vice are everywhere permeating every nook and cranny of the market.

Workers soon realize that working hard gets them nothing so they stop doing that. They do half-assed work and only as much as they have to, to get by. Stealing from the government for self-enrichment becomes a societal norm.

At least in a gig economy the worker gets to keep what they earn rather than have the government confiscate it. While I do bother to pay taxes on my gig electrical work, if I were doing more of that, I'd be making a pretty damn good living at it. My last service panel install was about 24 hours of work and I netted $3000. After paying off the materials and help it worked out to about $45 an hour. So, you can't say a gig economy doesn't work. It does, you just have to have more than basic skills like driving Uber or being a pizza delivery boy to rake in the cash in it.
 
goat said:
Labor wages in the US used to be coupled with profits. That all ended in the '80s. We all witnessed how fast the U.S. Maritime Alliance gave a 62% wage increase to the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) once they threatened to shut down the supply chain. Why is that?

Workers own their production in Marxism. Zoomers were born into a gig economy in which workers own nothing, they rent everything. It's called neo-feudalism, a step back from capitalism. The upcoming global market collapse is expected to be as bad or worse than 1929. There was a communist party in the US going back to 1848, They're called the Forty-Eighters.
Click to expand...
we don;t need the communist party.

we just need tariffs.

it really is this simple.

you're getting sucked into stupid land.

get the spooks out of your ear, dummy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, workers own nothing in Marxism. The government and central committee decide everything. In a Communist economy, the economy increasingly is controlled by a black market. Everyone who can goes around the government, not to or through it, to get things done. The black marketers don't stand in the bread line, they have a connection and get theirs up front. Barter often becomes a staple and way of economic life. Corruption and vice are everywhere permeating every nook and cranny of the market.

Workers soon realize that working hard gets them nothing so they stop doing that. They do half-assed work and only as much as they have to, to get by. Stealing from the government for self-enrichment becomes a societal norm.

At least in a gig economy the worker gets to keep what they earn rather than have the government confiscate it. While I do bother to pay taxes on my gig electrical work, if I were doing more of that, I'd be making a pretty damn good living at it. My last service panel install was about 24 hours of work and I netted $3000. After paying off the materials and help it worked out to about $45 an hour. So, you can't say a gig economy doesn't work. It does, you just have to have more than basic skills like driving Uber or being a pizza delivery boy to rake in the cash in it.
Click to expand...
You show how little Americans know about Marxism and Communism. The Southeast US was hit with 2 huge hurricanes, yet the US government did little to nothing for them. In the China model, the CCP would send in 200,000 workers to get everyone who wanted out relocated to new housing and given all the necessities as another 200,000 workers rebuilt the entire region.

Then the relocated residents would be given a choice to return to their new home or stay in their house away from the hurricane belt. The China model takes care of the people, it's nowhere near perfect but you won't see tent cities or decaying infrastructure anywhere in a country of 1.5 billion people. Everything is built for the 21st century.

Anyone in China who wants a house or job is given one. Local government takes care of that and centralized government only gets involved when things are too large for the municipality to deal with. During covid, 20 million Chinese workers lost their job. Anyone who wanted a new job was given one. Some chose to leave the city and go back to their farm.
 
goat said:
You show how little Americans know about Marxism and Communism. The Southeast US was hit with 2 huge hurricanes, yet the US government did little to nothing for them. In the China model, the CCP would send in 200,000 workers to get everyone who wanted out relocated to new housing and given all the necessities as another 200,000 workers rebuilt the entire region.
Click to expand...

When did it become the federal government's responsibility to provide everything to people with property losses? That's what insurance is for. That's what preparation for these sorts of storms is for. If someone didn't prepare and insure themselves, that's on them. The federal government isn't our fucking parents.

As for what fascist--not communist, fascist--China would or wouldn't do, that's not relevant. But let's go with your example for a moment. The federal government DRAFTS--you know, like the military would in a war--200,000 workers from wherever, pays them a pittance, and then tells them to fix all the hurricane damage. The workers get no say. They aren't paid fairly for their work.

I'd expect most to do half assed labor at a lethargic level because they don't want to be there. Of course, forced relocation of the population isn't going to be taken happily either...
goat said:
Then the relocated residents would be given a choice to return to their new home or stay in their house away from the hurricane belt. The China model takes care of the people, it's nowhere near perfect but you won't see tent cities or decaying infrastructure anywhere in a country of 1.5 billion people. Everything is built for the 21st century.
Click to expand...

Yea, so they go or stay. Their new home is one built to government specs that were largely ignored so the workmanship is shoddy and shitty. The next storm comes and their home is trashed again. China builds all kinds of fucked up, half assed, shit like that all the time.
goat said:
Anyone in China who wants a house or job is given one. Local government takes care of that and centralized government only gets involved when things are too large for the municipality to deal with. During covid, 20 million Chinese workers lost their job. Anyone who wanted a new job was given one. Some chose to leave the city and go back to their farm.
Click to expand...
Wants? Try is forced to take a job. During COVID, the government welded doors to apartments in high rises shut so the occupant(s) couldn't leave. China is fucked up like a soup sandwich, and you want the here? You are fucking insane!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top