Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
The telemarketer has spoken.
WaPo is the absolute worst.....
Yet the telemarketer cites the Washington Times...
Telemarketers are the scum of the earth.
The Washington Times is the scum of right-wing "journalism".
Hah! Thanks for the laugh. Teabaggers shut down the govt. That means all memorials are closed. Palin/Cruz organize a riot, and they aren't happy when it doesn't work?
You make this toooooooooooooooooooooo easy, Goober.
The Washington Times is the scum of right-wing "journalism".
Liberal bias in journalism is often baked into the cake. The traditional ethos of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable leads to demands that government solve every problem. Favoring big government, then, becomes routine among most journalists, especially young ones.
I know because I was one of them. I started at the Times while the Vietnam War and civil-rights movement raged, and was full of certainty about right and wrong.
My editors were, too, though in a different way.
Our boss of bosses, the legendary Abe Rosenthal, knew his reporters leaned left, so he leaned right to “keep the paper straight.”
That meant the Times, except for the opinion pages, was scrubbed free of reporters’ political views, an edict that was enforced by giving the opinion and news operations separate editors. The church-and-state structure was one reason the Times was considered the flagship of journalism.
Those days are gone. The Times now is so out of the closet as a Clinton shill that it is giving itself permission to violate any semblance of evenhandedness in its news pages as well as its opinion pages.
A recent article by its media reporter, Jim Rutenberg, whom I know and like, began this way:
Whoa, Nellie. The clear assumption is that many reporters see Trump that way, and it is note*worthy that no similar question is raised about Clinton, whose scandals are deserving only of “scrutiny.”
Rutenberg approvingly cites a leftist journalist who calls one candidate “normal” and the other *“abnormal.”
Clinton is hardly “normal” to the 68 percent of Americans who find her dishonest and untrustworthy, though apparently not a single one of those people writes for the Times. Statistically, that makes the Times “abnormal.”
Also, you don’t need to be a *detective to hear echoes in that first paragraph of Clinton speeches and ads, including those featured prominently on the Times’ Web site. In effect, the paper has seamlessly *adopted Clinton’s view as its own, then tries to justify its coverage.
It’s an impossible task, and Rutenberg fails because he must. Any reporter who agrees with Clinton about Trump has no business covering either candidate.
It’s pure bias, which the Times fancies itself an expert in detecting in others, but is blissfully tolerant of its own. And with the top political editor quoted in the story as *approving the one-sided coverage as necessary and deserving, the prejudice is now official policy.
It’s a historic mistake and a complete break with the paper’s own traditions. Instead of dropping its standards, the Times should bend over backwards to enforce them, even while acknowledging that Trump is a rare breed. That’s the whole point of standards — they are designed to guide decisions not just in easy cases, but in all cases, to preserve trust.
The Times, of course, is not alone in becoming unhinged over Trump, but that’s also the point. It used to be unique because of its adherence to fairness.
Now its only standard is a double standard, one that it proudly *confesses. Shame would be more appropriate.
https://nypost.com/2016/08/21/american-journalism-is-collapsing-before-our-eyes/
much of the Clinton emails info , and the Clinton Foundation is not coming from the press. Little if ANYTHING is coming from the press!
It's coming from Judicial Watch and Citizen's United, whatever you think of them-they are acting as an investigative press.
I disagree. I collapsed a long time ago. Now they show no pretense of objectivity. They de facto party members of the DNC
If they went after Hillary and reported on her the way they do Trump she couldn't be a candidate.
Oh! The irony of it! A Hillary Clinton supporter calling Rupert Murdoch a "liar." Simply hilarious!
Brain-dead partisans are such twits!
Jesus - don't you know Murdoch is the world champion liar, with a million Olympic victories for lying of every sort, whereas Mrs Clinton is just a politician. You really do believe in witches, you weirdos, don't you!