Americans calling for Comey to run for president in 2020

floridafan said:
You were the one telling us that very little money was injected by the Russians, so give us your sources- in other words, prove it. CITE
Click to expand...

I stated from what we know now... I have not seen any site state they have invested large sums of cash. So if you believe I am wrong. Prove it. You won't, because as I stated, it isn't there.
 
Superfreak said:
I stated from what we know now... I have not seen any site state they have invested large sums of cash. So if you believe I am wrong. Prove it. You won't, because as I stated, it isn't there.
Click to expand...

Of course it isn't there, we have not learned the exact numbers yet. You can't pretend to know anything but guesswork
 
floridafan said:
Money buys a lot, huge amounts of it buys a hell of a lot more. Do we really know yet just how many millions upon millions they threw at the election?
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
from what is known now, very little money was injected by Russians.
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
Therein lies the problem, you don't know shit! Please don't pretend as though you do.
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
Please, enlighten me. Show me the data.
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
You were the one telling us that very little money was injected by the Russians, so give us your sources- in other words, prove it. CITE
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
I stated from what we know now... I have not seen any site state they have invested large sums of cash. So if you believe I am wrong. Prove it. You won't, because as I stated, it isn't there.
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
Of course it isn't there, we have not learned the exact numbers yet. You can't pretend to know anything but guesswork
Click to expand...

So do shut your ass next time.
 
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and "predict" there will be a cabal of Goldman Sachs execs in the white house after the 2020 election.














Same as it ever was, regardless of electoral outcomes.
 
Superfreak said:
So then, next time I say 'from what we know now' perhaps you won't tell me I am wrong? Thanks for proving my point.
Click to expand...

"from what we know"? There is nothing known, except for some large sums of money donated to the NRA, and one very large donation to the Trump charity. The monies spent on social media advertising, didn't come out of the blue either. This is an iceberg, we see the top 5 or 10% but there is a whole lot going on down below.
 
floridafan said:
"from what we know"? There is nothing known, except for some large sums of money donated to the NRA, and one very large donation to the Trump charity. The monies spent on social media advertising, didn't come out of the blue either. This is an iceberg, we see the top 5 or 10% but there is a whole lot going on down below.
Click to expand...

Yes, from what we know, that means to date, there hasn't been much detail on what was spent. You then inject your opinion as if that matters. You have no clue, because there is no data, yet you suggest this is simply the tip of the iceberg? Based on WHAT?
 
floridafan said:
On the contrary, YOU were the one making the original claim without the first bit of knowledge, so it would be best if you shut you ass until facts are available.
Click to expand...

moron... if there is no data, which you agree there isnt... then yes, based on what we know, they didn't. you fucking moron.
 
Superfreak said:
Bernie Sanders voters would disagree with you. They absolutely were pushing for Hillary. But if you want to know what drove them away from hillary even more, it was the condescending bullshit like you just spewed out.

Again, the fact that it was close in those three states proves she could have taken them had she simply TRIED.
Click to expand...

Of course the Berniebots would disagree. They'll never take responsibility for sticking us with Trump no matter how much they know it's true. They were so sold on Sanders' pie in the sky pipe dreams they'd never have voted for anyone else no matter who it was.

The fact that it was close in three states proves that had she not had the burdens of Sanders and Stein she would've wiped up the floor with Trump the way Obama wiped up the floor with McCain and Romney.
 
Nomad said:
Of course the Berniebots would disagree. They'll never take responsibility for sticking us with Trump no matter how much they know it's true. They were so sold on Sanders' pie in the sky pipe dreams they'd never have voted for anyone else no matter who it was.

The fact that it was close in three states proves that had she not had the burdens of Sanders and Stein she would've wiped up the floor with Trump the way Obama wiped up the floor with McCain and Romney.
Click to expand...

and AGAIN... had she simply gone there and campaigned she could have won to. Blaming Sanders and Stein is the typical Hillarygirl cop out. It is pathetic. You and your kind will never admit it was Hillary's fault. The fact that you rail against Bernie's supporters for never taking responsibility is fucking hysterical.
 
Superfreak said:
and AGAIN... had she simply gone there and campaigned she could have won to. Blaming Sanders and Stein is the typical Hillarygirl cop out. It is pathetic. You and your kind will never admit it was Hillary's fault. The fact that you rail against Bernie's supporters for never taking responsibility is fucking hysterical.
Click to expand...

Seriously. Yeah, poor Hillary. Only if she didn't have any other competition she would have won.

Because not only did she lose, she lost to Trump. That's how bad of a candidate she was. That's not Bernie's fault.
 
Stupidfreak said:
and AGAIN... had she simply gone there and campaigned she could have won to. Blaming Sanders and Stein is the typical Hillarygirl cop out. It is pathetic. You and your kind will never admit it was Hillary's fault. The fact that you rail against Bernie's supporters for never taking responsibility is fucking hysterical.
Click to expand...

You have zero idea what the effect of campaigning harder in the upper Midwest would have been. Should she have done so? Of course. It couldn't have hurt. Was her campaign perfect? Of course not. Nobody does anything perfect and mistakes can always be found after the fact if they are looked for. But the reality of the effect of having two alternative candidates for people who were either in the fence about her or were butthurt because their guy lost to her in the primary, cannot be denied.

What's really fucking hysterical is your apparent belief that anyone sees your anti-Hillary screed as anything but what it is... the standard, typical, moronic right-wing hate Hillary obsession.
 
cawacko said:
Seriously. Yeah, poor Hillary. Only if she didn't have any other competition she would have won.

Because not only did she lose, she lost to Trump. That's how bad of a candidate she was. That's not Bernie's fault.
Click to expand...

Sanders knew he'd take votes from Hillary and possibly hand the election to the worst asshole in history to occupy the WH, but he was more interested in his own political fortunes than the good of America.

Now he gets to wake up every day and know he's responsible for Trump.
 
cawacko said:
Seriously. Yeah, poor Hillary. Only if she didn't have any other competition she would have won.

Because not only did she lose, she lost to Trump. That's how bad of a candidate she was. That's not Bernie's fault.
Click to expand...
people think of Trumps high negatives, and they were but her's were almost equally as bad.
She ran a crappy campaign, never came clean to the voters about her emails, took too much time off, went to zillion$ fundraisers and had zero message except "I'm with her" -and she did not defend the blue wall
 
Nomad said:
Sanders knew he'd take votes from Hillary and possibly hand the election to the worst asshole in history to occupy the WH, but he was more interested in his own political fortunes than the good of America.

Now he gets to wake up every day and know he's responsible for Trump.
Click to expand...

So is America a Democracy or not? Should a candidate be able to run if their supporters want them to? You really think Hillary should have been able to go through the primary with no competition?
 
anatta said:
people think of Trumps high negatives, and they were but her's were almost equally as bad.
She ran a crappy campaign, never came clean to the voters about her emails, took too much time off, went to zillion$ fundraisers and had zero message except "I'm with her" -and she did not defend the blue wall
Click to expand...

They had the two highest unfavorables of any candidates over the past 50 years. The idea that someone as unpopular as Hillary should run unopposed in a primary is a joke. Trump at least had to go through 16 candidates including some with big money behind him.
 
anatta said:
people think of Trumps high negatives, and they were but her's were almost equally as bad.
She ran a crappy campaign, never came clean to the voters about her emails, took too much time off, went to zillion$ fundraisers and had zero message except "I'm with her" -and she did not defend the blue wall
Click to expand...
This might be an interesting read . Comes out tomorrow.

Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns, and One Intact Glass Ceiling Apr 24, 2018
by Amy Chozick
51-iIbZO0HL._AC_US218_.jpg

From the book:
Robby Mook, the drained and deflated campaign manager, told his boss she was going to lose. She didn’t seem all that surprised.
“I knew it. I knew this would happen to me,” she said, now within a couple of inches of Mr. Mook’s ashen face. “They were never going to let me be president.”
Click to expand...
Kinda says it all doesn't it, her sense of entitlement.
 
cawacko said:
So is America a Democracy or not? Should a candidate be able to run if their supporters want them to? You really think Hillary should have been able to go through the primary with no competition?
Click to expand...

Nomad seems to think hrc should have run unopposed in the general. She was entitled after all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top