An idea for bipartisan tax reform
- Thread starter Oneuli
- Start date
Right...everyone is wrong except you and your fellow mouth breathers. People so dumb, they were conned by a reality TV show host.
OK.
LOL.
Including this one:
That is your opinion of what is spelled out in the Constitution, and no court has validated it. So you're trying to establish your own personal standard as the given. Which is bullshit because you've done nothing to earn that.
True, but you seek accommodation of your opinion.
Yes, we know that you will have an opinion regardless of evidence that discredits it. This is nothing new from you folks.
So you don't drive on highways?
You don't eat meat inspected by the USDA?
You don't use the public sewer system? So you shit in an outhouse in your backyard?
You don't fly from airports?
You don't buy consumer goods imported through port authorities?
You won't take Medicare or Social Security?
Yeah...I don't believe you.
Rich people are successful people, taxing them more is punishing success.
Which is your opinion, not the given standard.
So once again, you are trying to shoehorn your opinion into what is the standard when you've done absolutely nothing to earn that entitlement and accommodation.
Nothing.
Again, your opinion, not the standard.
If they were so clearly written, you'd get more victories in court.
As it stands, you have ZERO.
More of your opinion being substituted for fact.
You tend to do that with everything here. At least you're consistent in that, since you're not consistent elsewhere.
Again, your opinion is being substituted for a standard.
Also, read up on the Constitution to determine the powers of the Judicial Branch. You seem to need a refresher.
The greed part is wanting everyone to pay for your voters instead of just you!
Which is your opinion that has not been validated by the Judicial Branch.
So what we have here is you insisting on something despite the law saying otherwise.
For some reason, you think you're entitled to your opinion of what the Constitution says. You're not. The courts are.
Which would be a goalpost shift from what you said before. But OK. Flip-flop around. I really don't care.
I'm not the one who thinks my opinion is the standard that supersedes centuries of judicial precedent and the powers given to the Judicial Branch.
That's all you.
LOL!
Seems like you don't want to admit that cutting taxes doesn't actually do any of the things Conservatives promise. That's why your argument foregoes all evidence, facts, and figures for a subjective one based in emotion.
You're too emotional. Calm down. Smile more.
Inherited wealth is success? Since when?
Let me quote you, it's non of your business!
You said that wealth translates to success.
So how is inheriting wealth indicative of success?
Not everyone asshole; but most definitely a lying dumb fuck like you. You're incapable of getting anything right due to your extremely low IQ and being a hyper partisan hack.
Well someone had to have been successful, and passed it along, why do you feel like you are entitled to any of it. Go get a job, pay taxes, and if you ever become rich, give me half. You people need to understand it's not yours, until you steal it through the government strong handing the tax payer. How about all the rich democrats start by being charitable with the money they have been given, by being able to insider trade, then have all the hollywood jackasses come out of their mansions, and give more, set the example, you know put your socialism where your mouth is! I mean I know you don't work so you can't be but how about they set the good example pay more than they owe.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
What a massive pile of progressive bull shit.
At the end of 2009, congressional DEMOCRATS drafted a new HEALTH bill and rushed it to President OBAMA for signature in just seven weeks. No congressional REPUBLICANS were permitted in the drafting sessions, and no hearings were held after the draft legislation was released. As a result, no other members of Congress and no members of the public whom the bill’s sweeping provisions would affect had adequate opportunity to review the proposed changes and identify potential problems—much less offer suggestions for how to improve the bill.
What a massive pile of Republican mentality and bull shit. LOL!
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Again, I am referring to the original text of the US Constitution. I am very familiar with Marbury v Madison where the US Supreme court assumed for itself powers that were never delegated by the US Constitution. The Supreme Court was not given the power of judicial review of the Constitution.
The Constitution said what it said, it did not need "interpreting". The only people who want to "interpret" it are those who do not want to abide by what is written in those words.