And like that, America's history is scrubbed

anatta

100% recycled karma
For years, Democrats and those on the left have been trying to suppress America’s true history — the one that tells of American Exceptionalism, the one that speaks of the genius of the Founding Fathers, the one that speaks of freedoms for the individual as coming from God, not government.

And now, with George Floyd, they’re having their moment in the sun.

The left is on a rampage right now, busily tearing down any semblance of American history from America’s public eye.

The destroyers are everywhere.

In Washington, D.C., it was the World War II Memorial and fountain that were targeted by vandals who spray-painted, “Do black vets count?” And the Paralyzed Veterans of America’s headquarters. And the Department of Veterans Affairs headquarters. And several spots in the vicinity of the White House.

There are more, there are many more.

The protesters are supposedly angry at police brutality and systemic police racism.

But tearing down national monuments and defacing expressions of American history are acts of ISIS terrorists.

That such defacement is occurring on a widespread scale right now is not only a sad commentary on the tensions currently tearing at America’s fabric. But it’s also a sad, even sadder face-slapping reality show of how our schools are failing our emerging generations.

If true history were still taught in the public schools, angry youth wouldn’t be roaming the streets looking to lash out at some of the very foundations that helped make America so great and free in the first place. If places of higher learning in America hadn’t become breeding grounds for far-leftist professors to implant their propaganda, educated idiots wouldn’t be trampling over the symbols of America Past, trying to blot out the offensive and with it, the truths.

Simply put, a statue of Robert E. Lee doesn’t represent a national worship of Robert E. Lee. It only represents the historical contributions Robert E. Lee made in America — historical contributions that are irrefutably substantial.

Who would Black Lives Matter rather have as the faces of America’s monuments and memorials and statues? Or, to use the statue-destroyers’ standard: Who is perfect enough to be a face of America’s monuments and memorials and statues? Unless the answer is Jesus, it’s a lie.

America is not without sin. America doesn’t have a sinless past.

But what America does have is a Constitution and a set of founding documents and principles that lay the groundwork for all citizens, no matter ethnicity, no matter sex, no matter religion, no matter political leanings — but for all citizens to seek, to pursue, to achieve their hopes, goals and dreams in freedom, absent overburdensome government interference.

What America does offer is a set of governing ideals
that guarantee a black man the same rights as a white man; that hold a president of the United States to the same judicial standards as a garbage collector; that secure the freedoms of a woman the same as a man — as coming from God, not government.

After all these years of warring and bloodshed, of bickering and disputing, of dying through trying: They’re still there. The dream of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness is still alive and well in America, for all to grab at, for all to embrace, no matter race, creed, color, sex, etc.

It’s just that it’s much easier to throw paint on a memorial than it is it to study hard, work hard and stay the course to achieve the dream.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/11/and-like-that-americas-history-is-scrubbed/
 
We would if we were smarter consider that our model, the Soviet Union, failed.

Sadly we are not that intelligent.

WE USED TO BE BETTER!
 
We would if we were smarter consider that our model, the Soviet Union, failed.

Sadly we are not that intelligent.

WE USED TO BE BETTER!

object and fight back with the truth that America is egalitarian under law, and reform doesn't mean destruction,,
no whining about it..speak up about American Exceptionalism
 
For years, Democrats and those on the left have been trying to suppress America’s true history — the one that tells of American Exceptionalism, the one that speaks of the genius of the Founding Fathers, the one that speaks of freedoms for the individual as coming from God, not government.

And now, with George Floyd, they’re having their moment in the sun.

The left is on a rampage right now, busily tearing down any semblance of American history from America’s public eye.

The destroyers are everywhere.

In Washington, D.C., it was the World War II Memorial and fountain that were targeted by vandals who spray-painted, “Do black vets count?” And the Paralyzed Veterans of America’s headquarters. And the Department of Veterans Affairs headquarters. And several spots in the vicinity of the White House.

There are more, there are many more.

The protesters are supposedly angry at police brutality and systemic police racism.

But tearing down national monuments and defacing expressions of American history are acts of ISIS terrorists.

That such defacement is occurring on a widespread scale right now is not only a sad commentary on the tensions currently tearing at America’s fabric. But it’s also a sad, even sadder face-slapping reality show of how our schools are failing our emerging generations.

If true history were still taught in the public schools, angry youth wouldn’t be roaming the streets looking to lash out at some of the very foundations that helped make America so great and free in the first place. If places of higher learning in America hadn’t become breeding grounds for far-leftist professors to implant their propaganda, educated idiots wouldn’t be trampling over the symbols of America Past, trying to blot out the offensive and with it, the truths.

Simply put, a statue of Robert E. Lee doesn’t represent a national worship of Robert E. Lee. It only represents the historical contributions Robert E. Lee made in America — historical contributions that are irrefutably substantial.

Who would Black Lives Matter rather have as the faces of America’s monuments and memorials and statues? Or, to use the statue-destroyers’ standard: Who is perfect enough to be a face of America’s monuments and memorials and statues? Unless the answer is Jesus, it’s a lie.

America is not without sin. America doesn’t have a sinless past.

But what America does have is a Constitution and a set of founding documents and principles that lay the groundwork for all citizens, no matter ethnicity, no matter sex, no matter religion, no matter political leanings — but for all citizens to seek, to pursue, to achieve their hopes, goals and dreams in freedom, absent overburdensome government interference.

What America does offer is a set of governing ideals
that guarantee a black man the same rights as a white man; that hold a president of the United States to the same judicial standards as a garbage collector; that secure the freedoms of a woman the same as a man — as coming from God, not government.

After all these years of warring and bloodshed, of bickering and disputing, of dying through trying: They’re still there. The dream of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness is still alive and well in America, for all to grab at, for all to embrace, no matter race, creed, color, sex, etc.

It’s just that it’s much easier to throw paint on a memorial than it is it to study hard, work hard and stay the course to achieve the dream.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/11/and-like-that-americas-history-is-scrubbed/

Such commies.
 
object and fight back with the truth that America is egalitarian under law, and reform doesn't mean destruction,,
no whining about it..speak up about American Exceptionalism

Or as Gad Saad basically puts it... "Dont be a schmuck like most everyone else....FIGHT!".
 
The cruel slave master Robert E Lee

-- In his own words: He believed blacks were better off as slaves, and the "discipline" they received was necessary for their "instruction". --

Lee was a slave owner—his own views on slavery were explicated in an 1856 letter that is often misquoted to give the impression that Lee was some kind of abolitionist. In the letter, he describes slavery as “a moral & political evil,” but goes on to explain that:

"I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of fiery Controversy." -- Robert E Lee

The argument here is that slavery is bad for white people, good for black people, and most important, better than abolitionism; emancipation must wait for divine intervention. That black people might not want to be slaves does not enter into the equation; their opinion on the subject of their own bondage is not even an afterthought to Lee.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/529038/
 
White House, all of the earliest presidents (except for John Adams and his son John Quincy Adams) were slave owners. George Washington kept some 300 bondsmen at his Mount Vernon plantation. Thomas Jefferson—despite once calling slavery an “assemblage of horrors”—owned at least 175 enslaved workers at one time. James Madison, James Monroe and Andrew Jackson each kept several dozen enslaved workers, and Martin Van Buren owned one during his early career.

William Henry Harrison owned several inherited enslaved people before becoming president in 1841, while John Tyler and James K. Polk were both slaveholders during their stints in office. Zachary Taylor, who served from 1849-1850, was the last chief executive to keep enslaved people while living in the White House. He owned some 150 enslaved workers on plantations in Kentucky, Mississippi and Louisiana."

Do we remove statues of these Founding Fathers?

I don't think so.

The Democrats are the new Taliban...and ISIS.
 
280547_image.jpg
 
99 percent of right wing deplorables who claim they are only acting in defense of protecting historical knowledge, have never actually even read a book about Robert E Lee, have never taken a college level course on the Confereracy, and have thus shown through their actions this is not really about honoring historical education and knowledge.

As for me, I have video classes about Robert E Lee, the history of the American South, the history of the Civil War on my streaming video watch list -- because I actually believe studying the Confereracy and the Confederate leadership is important to reflect on, and holds lessons for the erudite person.
 
Historical statues being destroyed. A statue of Columbus in Boston, torn down and beheaded.

The Democrats who support Antifa and this destruction of historical statues are the new Taliban...ISIS.
 
White House, all of the earliest presidents (except for John Adams and his son John Quincy Adams) were slave owners. George Washington kept some 300 bondsmen at his Mount Vernon plantation. Thomas Jefferson—despite once calling slavery an “assemblage of horrors”—owned at least 175 enslaved workers at one time. James Madison, James Monroe and Andrew Jackson each kept several dozen enslaved workers, and Martin Van Buren owned one during his early career.

William Henry Harrison owned several inherited enslaved people before becoming president in 1841, while John Tyler and James K. Polk were both slaveholders during their stints in office. Zachary Taylor, who served from 1849-1850, was the last chief executive to keep enslaved people while living in the White House. He owned some 150 enslaved workers on plantations in Kentucky, Mississippi and Louisiana."

Do we remove statues of these Founding Fathers?

I don't think so.

The Democrats are the new Taliban...and ISIS.

By the 1860s there was an international consensus that slavery was wrong. Chattel slavery was illegal almost everywhere in the western world by the 1860s except in the American South.

Everyone had read, or was aware of Uncle Tom's cabin, in the 1860s and was aware of the immorality of slavery.

By the 1860s the excuses to defend slavery had run out, and by the 1860s it was time to make this choice:

For chattel slavery?
Or against it?

Robert E Lee decided in the 1860s that chattel slavery was worth committing treason and killing American soldiers over
 
99 percent of right wing deplorables who claim they are only acting in defense of protecting historical knowledge, have never actually even read a book about Robert E Lee, have never taken a college level course on the Confereracy, and have thus shown through their actions this is not really about honoring historical education and knowledge.

As for me, I have video classes about Robert E Lee, the history of the American South, the history of the Civil War on my streaming video watch list -- because I actually believe studying the Confereracy and the Confederate leadership is important to reflect on, and holds lessons for the erudite person.

Does your disdain for the south run deep enough that you think they should be removed from the Union?
 
It must really bother people who are too insecure, that they are no longer “special”, and that they’re no better than anyone else.

Sorry you’ve been living a lie and an illusion.

It’s morning ... Wake The Fuck You, and try having some coffee

:cool:
 
Back
Top