ZenMode
Well-known member
I don't need to make disappear that which never appeared.You can't make the evidence of Democrat election fraud just disappear, Void.
I don't need to make disappear that which never appeared.You can't make the evidence of Democrat election fraud just disappear, Void.
Sworn witness testimony of what someone imagined they saw.An affidavit is not a 'card', Void. It is sworn witness testimony. You can't just discard them.
Again, I don't need to dosprove what you never proved.Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't just make the evidence of Democrat election fraud just disappear.
Blatant lie.Here's irony for you.
"Republicans poured tens of millions of dollars last year into convincing their voters that casting ballots by mail was safe
Argument of the Stone fallacy.after Trump spent years bashing the practice and baselessly insisting it was rife with fraud.
Argument from randU fallacy. Made up numbers are not data.And it worked, with GOP voters closing or even reversing the mail voting gap with Democrats in several states...
Argument from randU fallacy. Inversion fallacy. The Democrats are not the GOP.Republicans made significant strides in 2024 toward closing what had been a Democratic advantage in mail voting four years prior, even as the overall share of voters casting ballots by mail fell 13 percentage points from 2020, when the pandemic changed voting habits."
![]()
The GOP spent millions supporting mail ballots. Now Trump’s attacking them again.
Trump wants to roll back mail voting that he baselessly claims is ripe for fraud.www.yahoo.com
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Fallacy fallacy.You can't support a baseless claim with a second baseless, circular claim.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.I don't need to make disappear that which never appeared.
Argument of the Stone fallacies.Sworn witness testimony of what someone imagined they saw.
Again, I don't need to dosprove what you never proved.
For one thing Trump can NOT do a fucking thing about mail in ballots or anything else if it has to do with the Presidential election.A few states and DC conduct all elections by mail-in votes. This wasn't an issue until trump made it one, and all the magas fell in line behind him like lemmings.
I think she lives in Compton.Someone here knows where she is...
The machines have been proven to be crap.For one thing Trump can NOT do a fucking thing about mail in ballots or anything else if it has to do with the Presidential election.
Elections for Senators or Congressmen may be different but for President he has NO say in how the states do it.
Unless he wants to break the CONSTITUTION , ( and his oath to up hold it )
It is right in the CONSTITUTION that it is up to the state legislatures how they assign ( appoint ) their delegates to the EC and how to vote .
In FACT the state legislatures don't even need to hold elections they can just appoint who ever they want to the EC and tell them who to vote for, but I think now a days IF they did that they wouldn't have a job in their state legislatures for long.
That's pathetic, you ol' bint.From Google, which any idiot, even a MAGATard can replicate:
"AI Overview
Instances of men casting ballots for their deceased wives have occurred.
One such case involved Barry Morphew of Colorado, who pleaded guilty to forgery for casting his missing wife Suzanne Morphew's 2020 ballot for then-President Donald Trump. Morphew told an FBI agent he did it because he thought Trump could use the extra vote and that he didn't know it was illegal to fill out a ballot on behalf of a spouse. As part of a plea agreement, Morphew was fined $600 and assessed court costs, avoiding jail time, but facing up to six years in prison if he violates the agreement.
Another case involved Larry Wiggins, a 62-year-old Florida man who was arrested for voter fraud after allegedly requesting a mail-in ballot for his deceased wife in 2020. Wiggins claimed he wanted to test the system. He faced a third-degree felony charge, which could have resulted in a $5,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
Robert Hartle of Nevada also pleaded guilty in 2021 to casting a mail-in ballot in the 2020 general election under the name of his late wife. He had initially claimed "disbelief" about someone stealing his wife's ballot, according to CNN. "
Once again, you've made another great pivot. Of course, you're trying to tip your king before we've even started the next game.You can't support a baseless claim with a second baseless, circular claim.
Why aren't you waking up to way the AP manipulates people?It's important to note that "mail in" was just the grifter's excuse in 2020. He also said 2016 was rigged, and called 2012 a "sham."
Why aren't people waking up to who this person is?
^The obliviousness is real. You can taste it.Of course not. One of our faithful Trumpsucking MAGATs here even has a sig line about accusing others of what they are doing -- straight from Nazi Goebbel's quote. That MAGAT is too stupid to understand that that accusation is mirrored back on the clueless idiot who uses it as a perceive personal insult.
That's not what districts in PA said when Democrats were honing their cheating in 2012.There are no districts that are 100% Democrat or Republican.
It does NOT matter in a Presidential election it is up to the states on how they want to appoint their delagates to the EC and how they vote.The machines have been proven to be crap.
The End.
Just last week they put on a demo of hacking them. :/
Somebody's getting released and some other somebodies are going to jail in Arizona.
If they use those machines in a Federal election, the results will be invalidated.It does NOT matter in a Presidential election it is up to the states on how they want to appoint their delagates to the EC and how they vote.
As I have said before they do NOT evn need to hold a election the state legislature can just appoint who they want and tell them how to vote, BUT I am sure now a days if they tried that they wouldn't have a job long.
Also..It does NOT matter in a Presidential election it is up to the states on how they want to appoint their delagates to the EC and how they vote.
As I have said before they do NOT evn need to hold a election the state legislature can just appoint who they want and tell them how to vote, BUT I am sure now a days if they tried that they wouldn't have a job long.
Yes he can, Finger. The federal government can enforce the law. That means State legislatures choose the electors, and the electors are free to vote as they wish. It also means that if a legislature choose to hold an advisory vote, that voting process can be regulated by the federal government to meet standards that it sets.For one thing Trump can NOT do a fucking thing about mail in ballots or anything else if it has to do with the Presidential election.
The President has a lot to say about it, Finger. Read Article II of the Constitution of the United State that you deny and discard.Elections for Senators or Congressmen may be different but for President he has NO say in how the states do it.
Upholding the Constitution is not breaking the Constitution, Finger. You cannot blame your problems on Trump.Unless he wants to break the CONSTITUTION , ( and his oath to up hold it )
Go read Article II again. State legislatures do choose the electoral college members for that State, but they cannot decide how they vote.It is right in the CONSTITUTION that it is up to the state legislatures how they assign ( appoint ) their delegates to the EC and how to vote.
That is correct.In FACT the state legislatures don't even need to hold elections they can just appoint who ever they want to the EC
That is incorrect. The EC is free to vote as they wish.and tell them who to vote for,
Why? The Constitution of the United States has not changed here.but I think now a days IF they did that they wouldn't have a job in their state legislatures for long.
He doesn't want to. It takes him out of his 'safe' space.Why aren't you waking up to way the AP manipulates people?