And the so-called 'non-existent' war on women continues...

\\()// said:
So refusing to allow someone to speak for using those terms and pretending "the move was meant to ensure civility and maturity in the debate over the bills" conveys no meaning to you?
Click to expand...

what meaning does pretending it was for using those terms have.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....the quote is in post #7 you feeble minded troll....
Click to expand...

Where?

PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....some idiot blogger is claiming she got banned for using the word vagina........in truth, she pissed off the Speaker of the House for saying "Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but no means no” and he cut off her time......but hey, why would a liberal be concerned with truth when they can make it look so much worse by lying about what happened.....
Click to expand...
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
And yet another example of our resident (o) dodging the facts.
Bless your little (o) heart. :D
Click to expand...

It's noted that you, PMP and the rube are willing to lie in order to defend the banning of speech. How patriotic of you! The facts are all on full display, yet you continue to try to (mis)interpret them to support your knuckledragging perspective. Maybe if you keep posting your woefully-transparent defenses of this slime, over and over, page after page, whoever's reading might forget the backwards actions towards women and reproductive rights actually happening in the caveman party you support?

Nah, probably not. :rofl2:
 
Bijou said:
In other words, the words vagina and vasectomy are uncivil and immature, according to you. Noted.
Click to expand...

another stupid assumption unfounded in fact......Legion is uncivil and immature based upon a year's experience with his posts, not because he used the words vagina and vasectomy.....you have less of a track record here, but you've certainly provided similar evidence.....
 
Bijou said:
It's noted that you, PMP and the rube are willing to lie in order to defend the banning of speech. How patriotic of you! The facts are all on full display, yet you continue to try to (mis)interpret them to support your knuckledragging perspective. Maybe if you keep posting your woefully-transparent defenses of this slime, over and over, page after page, whoever's reading might forget the backwards actions towards women and reproductive rights actually happening in the caveman party you support?

Nah, probably not. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

come on, Bijou....every one reading this thread knows that you're the one lying.....you want everyone to believe that she was banned simply for saying "vagina"........you know that isn't true, we know that isn't true, everyone reading this thread knows that isn't true.......
 
Bijou said:
It's noted that you, PMP and the rube are willing to lie in order to defend the banning of speech. How patriotic of you! The facts are all on full display, yet you continue to try to (mis)interpret them to support your knuckledragging perspective. Maybe if you keep posting your woefully-transparent defenses of this slime, over and over, page after page, whoever's reading might forget the backwards actions towards women and reproductive rights actually happening in the caveman party you support?

Nah, probably not. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

How have I lied? It's not speech that was banned, that has been made abundantly clear from those who banned her on down. It was the hyperbolic nature of the speech, which was the problem. Are you not smart enough to know what "hyperbole" means? If so, just ask somebody, or go look it up, but stop ignoring this aspect of the argument. It wasn't that she used a particular word, it was the way she used it. She could have said what she needed to say, without being hyperbolic, there was no need for that, and the legislature banned her. Good for them!
 
Dixie said:
How have I lied? It's not speech that was banned, that has been made abundantly clear from those who banned her on down. It was the hyperbolic nature of the speech, which was the problem. Are you not smart enough to know what "hyperbole" means? If so, just ask somebody, or go look it up, but stop ignoring this aspect of the argument. It wasn't that she used a particular word, it was the way she used it. She could have said what she needed to say, without being hyperbolic, there was no need for that, and the legislature banned her. Good for them!
Click to expand...

Lies that you believe and are helping to spread. Good on ya, rube! The GOP is counting on the rubes, christ-y nutballs and racists to promote their agenda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top