Anorexia Ocasio-Cortez says our immigration policy is "INHUMANE"

The world coming to an end was reported by the IPCC as a “potential damage”? As consistently wrong as the IPCC’s predictions are even they don’t predict the world coming to an end.
No, that was just plain dumb.

:palm:

One more time.

She was talking about the Millennials.

She was referring to this one: Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels would be a herculean task, involving rapid, dramatic changes in how governments, industries and societies function, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But even though the world has already warmed by 1 °C, humanity has 10–30 more years than scientists previously thought in which to kick its carbon habit.

The world would have to curb its carbon emissions by at least 49% of 2017 levels by 2030 and then achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 to meet this target, according to a summary of the latest IPCC report, released on 8 October. The report draws on research conducted since nations unveiled the 2015 Paris climate agreement, which seeks to curb greenhouse-gas emissions and limit global temperature increase to between 1.5 and 2 °C.

The world is on track for around 3 degrees of warming by the end of the century if it doesn’t make major reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions. It could breach 1.5 °C some time between 2030 and 2052 if global warming continues at its current rate.


Come on. I know you are smart.
 
:palm:

One more time.

She was talking about the Millennials.

She was referring to this one: Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels would be a herculean task, involving rapid, dramatic changes in how governments, industries and societies function, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But even though the world has already warmed by 1 °C, humanity has 10–30 more years than scientists previously thought in which to kick its carbon habit.

The world would have to curb its carbon emissions by at least 49% of 2017 levels by 2030 and then achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 to meet this target, according to a summary of the latest IPCC report, released on 8 October. The report draws on research conducted since nations unveiled the 2015 Paris climate agreement, which seeks to curb greenhouse-gas emissions and limit global temperature increase to between 1.5 and 2 °C.

The world is on track for around 3 degrees of warming by the end of the century if it doesn’t make major reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions. It could breach 1.5 °C some time between 2030 and 2052 if global warming continues at its current rate.


Come on. I know you are smart.

I don’t see where they say the world ends.
 
Stupid greedy bitch...

She wouldn't take the money. She blamed Trump for the condition of her grandma's house, but she has done nothing to help her. Then she turned down the donations.

This sums it up:

lg_3rethrenxmlutjkblpmtjq_vyadhnutqr03n3ih8.png
 
She wouldn't take the money. She blamed Trump for the condition of her grandma's house, but she has done nothing to help her. Then she turned down the donations.

This sums it up:

lg_3rethrenxmlutjkblpmtjq_vyadhnutqr03n3ih8.png

She has no right to bitch about grandma's house if she didn't lift a finger to help, other than blame Trump for a hurricane. Where's the National News at? Still trying to dig up shit on Trump :rolleyes:
 
She has no right to bitch about grandma's house if she didn't lift a finger to help, other than blame Trump for a hurricane. Where's the National News at? Still trying to dig up shit on Trump :rolleyes:

I don't get it. Why is he talking about AOC's grandma?
 
We aren't talking about grandma, we're talking about grandma's house. And AOC blaming Trump for the hurricane.

It's early, and you're already slippin'

tenor.gif

I guess I missed that part. Where did she blame Trump for the hurricane? And what does that have to do with the topic?
 
Certainly you can see it past the media biases.
Media bias?? She fucking said it. I’ll try to find another version of the whole thing. She was on some stage.
If she wasn’t told that it was a dumb remark why did she later say she was just joking?
 
Media bias?? She fucking said it. I’ll try to find another version of the whole thing. She was on some stage.
If she wasn’t told that it was a dumb remark why did she later say she was just joking?

Wow you are truly difficult.

Who was those people she was talking about at the very beginning?
 
Back
Top