Another appalling distraction from the issues

[zappasguitar]

That's novel. I think the press love's Trump's explosions!
But they are hostile to him as a candidate.

It's one thing to write editorials against candidates -that's a public service.
Massaging articles rates of appearence, or down right burying them for a news cycle means the press is deciding what you are gonna see.

What you consider "hostile" I consider nothing more than "unvarnished honesty".

If Trump wants glowing puff pieces written about him from the press, perhaps he should consider apologizing for mocking a handicapped reporter and not tossing the press from his rallies.

 

[Legion]

When Trumpf cries about how "nasty" and "disgusting" the press is, his loyal lapdoggies chant "Lock them up", don't they?

 

[anatta]

What you consider "hostile" I consider nothing more than "unvarnished honesty".

If Trump wants glowing puff pieces written about him from the press, perhaps he should consider apologizing for mocking a handicapped reporter and not tossing the press from his rallies.

stoking up a 3 day "assassination" story that never happened story is indeed hostile.
I do agree Trump provides the fodder to feed the press, however.

Nobody is looking for anything but fair coverage.. During that 3 day orgy of echo chambered self whipped up invention-
the Emails on the Clinton Foundation broke.

I started to watch 2 MS online sources - WaPO and NYTimes.
For most of the day it broke, it wasn't covered, missing the first day's news cycle.

It came back on WaPO at 9:45 that night. It was 'below the fold' ( old print newspaper term for buried under the lead)
the entire 2nd day. Guess what was STILL the lead??

 

[Seahawk]

Obama threw Fox News reporters out of his rallies?

Cite...

Why?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

 

[Seahawk]

What you consider "hostile" I consider nothing more than "unvarnished honesty".

If Trump wants glowing puff pieces written about him from the press, perhaps he should consider apologizing for mocking a handicapped reporter and not tossing the press from his rallies.

Has Trump thrown the press out of his rallies?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

 

[Darth Omar]

stoking up a 3 day "assassination" story that never happened story is indeed hostile.
I do agree Trump provides the fodder to feed the press, however.

Nobody is looking for anything but fair coverage.. During that 3 day orgy of echo chambered self whipped up invention-
the Emails on the Clinton Foundation broke.

I started to watch 2 MS online sources - WaPO and NYTimes.
For most of the day it broke, it wasn't covered, missing the first day's news cycle.

It came back on WaPO at 9:45 that night. It was 'below the fold' ( old print newspaper term for buried under the lead)
the entire 2nd day. Guess what was STILL the lead??

It's no coincidence that Assassination Gate drowned out the other two stories.

 

[zappasguitar]

Has Trump thrown the press out of his rallies?

Trump security removes POLITICO reporter from rally

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-security-politico-reporter-223856

Washington Post ban is latest battle in Trump's war with the press

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/06/trumps-war-with-the-press-224285#ixzz4HFXl4VsM

Univision anchor ejected from Trump news conference

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/25/politics/donald-trump-megyn-kelly-iowa-rally/

 

[zappasguitar]

stoking up a 3 day "assassination" story that never happened story is indeed hostile.
I do agree Trump provides the fodder to feed the press, however.

Nobody is looking for anything but fair coverage.. During that 3 day orgy of echo chambered self whipped up invention-
the Emails on the Clinton Foundation broke.

I started to watch 2 MS online sources - WaPO and NYTimes.
For most of the day it broke, it wasn't covered, missing the first day's news cycle.

It came back on WaPO at 9:45 that night. It was 'below the fold' ( old print newspaper term for buried under the lead)
the entire 2nd day. Guess what was STILL the lead??

You can't understand how the press might be (rightfully) skeptical of yet ANOTHER breathless report on Hillary's E-Mails?

After it has been demonstrated time after time that it was all just a partisan witch hunt?

Report after report concluded that Hillary was careless, but did NOTHING that rises to the level of "criminal", yet partisan hacks refuse to let it go.

 

[Legion Troll]

I started to watch 2 MS online sources - WaPO and NYTimes. For most of the day it broke, it wasn't covered, missing the first day's news cycle. It came back on WaPO at 9:45 that night. It was 'below the fold' ( old print newspaper term for buried under the lead)
the entire 2nd day.

So you say, telemarketer.

 

[Legionthecat]

It's no coincidence that Assassination Gate drowned out the other two stories.

TRUMPF! TRUMPF! TRUMPF!​