1) This is an ad populum fallacy (this many people agree with me, therefore I must be right.
2) It is based on a lie.
View attachment 14991
Another black Democrat walks away from the plantation, joins Trump
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
1) This is an ad populum fallacy (this many people agree with me, therefore I must be right.
2) It is based on a lie.
View attachment 14991
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Wow now you have two!
BattleofHodow
New member
Because they spend less, and live longer in most of the First World?
You must have missed that.
Who cares what some Scottish blooded dunderhead believes in your video.
Scottish people are notorious for their ignorance, and thriftiness.
BattleofHodow
New member
Living in the past much? No conversation can exist about immigration without you making it about Ronald Reagan not wanting a wall back when it wasn't clear that we were just going to be endlessly invaded by Third World parasites.
Reagan opened the door to invite in more & more Third-World illegals.
We got our first Illegal Guatemalans in Brewster, NY, around 1990, give or take a couple of years.
Obviously dumb bell Reagan sent the wrong message, as have a lot of other Republicans & Democrats too.
Speaking as a conservative, Reagan was one of the worst presidents in American history. Reagan backed unprecedented deficit spending, government growth, amnesty for illegals, etc.
Every first world "capitalist" country is dying, the US included, in regards to the native people who built those countries. Immigration is what's stopping America from declining in population. But, Communist China required women to have abortions to curb runaway native population growth.
If you weren't a moron, you'd know that feminism is genocide, not socialism (even though socialists are not adverse to genocide).
Also, moron, you're still ignoring that Americans pay much far more for medical care yet have lower life expectancies than the rest of the first world. Captisim isn't the problem, government is. it's the American government mess you're defending when you object to universal medical are.
Why are you so stupid?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Congratulations on finally learning English. THIS sentence actually means what you meant to say the first time, Captain Literacy.
What was that about reading comprehension skills again?
This made me understand I have to use simple words with one or two syllables only when I respond to your posts.
Let me know when you've upped your game and I'll bump you to three syllables.
30% of blacks was the last number posted on here.
Don't really care how many. Just as long as they keep leaving your dehumanizing plantation.
View attachment 15001
So yes. No conversation can exist about immigration without you making it about Ronald Reagan not wanting a wall back when it wasn't clear that we were just going to be endlessly invaded by Third World parasites.
They HAVE to spend less...the nanny state leaves them living in broom closet houses with 50-year mortgages, $10 per gallon gasoline, and virtually zero disposable income...all for the illusion of "free stuff" and being better maintained cattle with no rights.
No one's ASKING you to care what he believes. The video is being shown because what it SHOWS (that your argument is total horse shit).
So you're a bigot. Good to know.
BattleofHodow
New member
They HAVE to spend less...the nanny state leaves them living in broom closet houses with 50-year mortgages, $10 per gallon gasoline, and virtually zero disposable income...all for the illusion of "free stuff" and being better maintained cattle with no rights.
No one's ASKING you to care what he believes. The video is being shown because what it SHOWS (that your argument is total horse shit).
So you're a bigot. Good to know.
Because the USA government spent more than the government of Canada on healthcare.
When adjusting for out of pocket costs, the USA spent double of Canada on healthcare.
But, Canada lives longer.
Derp, derp, derp.
Since people seem obsessed with turning this into a debate on the left's pathological smear campaign against Ronald Reagan (why so desperate to misinform people about this one guy?)...
Top 10 liberal lies about Ronald Reagan:
The left's relentless 24/7 smear campaign against Ronald Reagan for daring to prove that liberal policies are the problem has now reached a fevered pitch, with Hollywood propagandists and partisan liberal "fact-checkers" coming out of the woodwork to trash his legacy at every turn, desperate to discredit the record they cannot explain away or compete with, using laughably absurd misinformation that flies in the face of all the facts and evidence.
Here are the top 10 outrageously false talking points used by liberals to misinform the public about Ronald Reagan's record:
1) Reagan gave tax breaks to the rich, causing a shortage in government revenues, requiring him to then raise taxes repeatedly on the Middle Class.
Reagan did dramatically lower taxes on those who create all the jobs in this country, thereby exploding economic growth and reversing the disastrous failure of liberalism under Jimmy Carter. And he did get politically forced by Democrats into ending some obscure tax deductions and passing some incredibly trivial and temporary increases in cigarette and gas taxes, thereby technically allowing dishonest liberal propagandists to willfully misrepresent him as having repeatedly "raised taxes" to rescue the economy...despite knowing that Reagan's policies drastically reduced overall taxation, while still increasing federal revenues (by adding millions of taxable new jobs).
2) Reagan tripled the national debt.
It is pretty brazen for any Democrat to even mention this subject, considering the utter national bankruptcy to which they have almost irreversibly enslaved future generations at this point.
Under Reagan, the national debt went from $2.79 trillion to $5.1 trillion, with a massive worldwide arms race against the Soviet Union running at full tilt. Under Democrats, our much larger national debt has doubled (and that's without taking into account all the future spending Democrats have committed us to), and we have already gone more than $6 trillion further into debt--far worse than any damage Reagan or either Bush ever did.
3) Reagan oversaw Iran/Contra.
This patriotic act of genius by Reagan sought to work around the tireless Democrat obstruction of aid to freedom-fighters in South America by arming Iran's regime (installed by Democrats), which, at the time, was fighting the far greater threat to our allies and interests in Iraq. For being willing to do whatever it takes to fight America's enemies, protect its allies, and defend its national interests, Reagan has been excoriated by liberals...who burn our flag, ban our Pledge, betray our allies and root for our enemies at every turn.
4) Reagan funded Terrorists.
Of course he did. When a terrorist group (the Taliban) is resisting a maniacal communist regime bent on global conquest (the Soviets), you aid that terrorist group. It's called supporting whatever policy advances your own national interests at the moment...and every country on Earth is allowed to do it except America, apparently, according to liberals. The policy to be offended by would be the left's insistence on arming, funding, supporting and even recruiting bloodthirsty Islamic lunatics who mass murder civilians and are at war with this country.
5) Reagan destroyed jobs.
As Forbes demonstrates with its graph of every presidency going back to FDR, job-creation absolutely exploded under Reagan (the current administration dead last). Liberals also absurdly pretend that Reagan giving job-creators more of their own money back to create jobs with somehow caused jobs to be sent overseas (which is actually caused by tax hikes, over-regulation, labor unions, frivolous lawsuits, etc.--all the Democrat policies that make it completely unaffordable to do business here).
Interestingly, liberals also fail to explain how the initial job losses during Reagan's first two years (before he turned a disastrous Democrat economy into a thriving recovery) weren't leftover casualties from the Carter years...a point liberals constantly rely on to falsely blame President Bush for the left's complete and utter economic failures.
6) Reagan ignored AIDS.
According to Human Events, citing the American Federation for AIDS Research:
-237,428 people died of AIDS under Reagan,
-3,328,978 died of AIDS under Clinton,
...so Clinton apparently cared far less about AIDS than Reagan, according to the left's embarrassingly kindergarten logic on this.
Additionally, as this Congressional report demonstrates, Reagan actually spent billions of dollars on AIDS research, in dramatically increasing amounts, despite the fact that things like heart disease and cancer were far more deadly diseases killing many times more Americans. The left's actual complaint on this is not that Reagan ignored AIDS, but that his special treatment for gays at everyone else's expense wasn't more extreme.
7) Reagan gave amnesty to illegal immigrants.
This absolutely happened (when there was no indication we were going to be overrun with an endless ocean of Third World parasites...and liberals are 100% correct: Even Reagan was not conservative enough.
8) Reagan attacked unions and the Middle Class.
This is a familiar leftist charade: Pretend to be outraged at the destruction of the Middle Class (which is the ultimate goal of liberalism) while only you continue pushing the policies that destroy it. For example, as Obamacare continues to skyrocket health care costs, the poor are staying poor, the rich are staying rich, and it is those in the Middle Class who are being violently shoved into a lower standard of living. Again, everything liberals fight for and protect makes it harder and harder for the Middle Class to exist (tax hikes, over-regulation, labor unions, frivolous lawsuits, etc.).
Unions are an unmitigated disaster for this country (see Detroit), and stopping their abuses is defending the Middle Class.
9) Reagan raided Social Security.
As CBS Money Watch explains, it simply never happened. But even if it had, perhaps this would demonstrate why we shouldn't have enacted an unconstitutional nanny state program requiring us to entrust our retirement planning to politicians.
10) Reagan doesn't deserve our support.
Apparently, Ronald Reagan deserves no particular gratitude or respect for rescuing us from utter economic ruin under Democrats, defeating the Soviets without going to war, and masterfully articulating our founding principles of individual liberty, free markets and limited government for the Ages. Liberals insist on vindictively smearing and vilifying the legacy of anyone who defends our rights and interests against non-stop Democrat failure, incompetence and treason...until they are marginalized, discredited and destroyed, regardless of the facts.
You sure smear people's intelligence a lot for someone who can't comprehend already posted proof that this spoon-fed socialist talking point has been long-debunked. Shall I post it a third time, or do the "non-morons" only have to be proven wrong TWICE in a row before their reading comprehension issues work themselves out?
And again, nobody's buying your obviously phony "I'm a conservative" routine. You were already busted using two accounts, embarrassing loser.
This made me understand I have to use simple words with one or two syllables only when I respond to your posts.
Let me know when you've upped your game and I'll bump you to three syllables.
You failing to comprehend what your own words mean in English is grounds for taunting someone else as having reading issues?
New hilariously moronic level of denial achieved.
BattleofHodow
New member
You sure smear people's intelligence a lot for someone who can't comprehend already posted proof that this spoon-fed socialist talking point has been long-debunked. Shall I post it a third time, or do the "non-morons" only have to be proven wrong TWICE in a row before their reading comprehension issues work themselves out?
And again, nobody's buying your obviously phony "I'm a conservative" routine. You were already busted using two accounts, embarrassing loser.
Light Socialism & Medium Socialism have the best track records of economic growth.
This was already debunked twice. Try to keep up.
Also, Democrats protect frivolous lawsuits from reform along party lines every single time (trial lawyers donate to Democrats) and illegal immigrants utterly bankrupting our health care system. Those two things dramatically explode costs in America. That has nothing to do with national or free market health care. That's about Democrats being scumbags and you being ignorant of the issues on which you debate.
Already debunked. Repeating that won't magically make it true.
BattleofHodow
New member
Already debunked. Repeating that won't magically make it true.
- FDR achieved the fastest economic growth period in 20th Century US history with Light Socialism.
- National Socialist Germany achieved faster economic growth than FDR, using Medium Socialism.
- Japan in the Japanese economic miracle achieved the #1 economic growth period in the 20th Century using Light Socialism.
- Spain in the Spanish Miracle achieved the #2 economic growth period in the 20th century using Light Socialism.
- The most impressive of all, Goliath China since 1990 has achieved top economic growth using Medium Socialism.
BattleofHodow
New member
Already debunked. Repeating that won't magically make it true.
I watched your dumb video.
Libertarianism can also be considered a cryptid.
Where is your Libertarian utopia?
As for the lack of birth rate?
Blaming it on welfare?
Eastern Europe had much higher birth rates under Communism than today.
Poland's birth rate was far higher in 1989.
The Polish government has used universal family income, to promote more births, and it is working better.
How Government Prolonged the Depression
FDR’s policies prolonged Great Depression
How FDR Prolonged the Great Depression
FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years
Their starting point was TOTAL ECONOMIC RUIN. ANY system would have gone nowhere but up.
Using wildly one-sided trade deals that had zero to do with socialism.
Spain has double-digit unemployment and their economic "growth" barely moves at a crawl. It's total trash. And here you sit holding them up as a success story like a brainwashed buffoon.
China was in abject poverty and economic gridlock until the 1980s, when they abandoned their economic communism, deregulated and lowered taxes, and immediately exploded onto the scene, as EVERYONE does the moment they abandon economically illiterate leftist policies.
Time to lay down the crack pipe and find talking points that HAVEN'T been debunked for decades.