Another Dem openly pushes political violence to terrorize people out of their rights

You're deflecting.
The point is that these are not Far Left ideas if the majority of Americans support them.

I am not deflecting; you are flailing. If the majority of Americans supported what you liars on the left claim they do, we would already have a massive Government run mismanaged healthcare program as shitty as those in other Western nations.

Guns would already be a thing of the past. But they aren't. The reason is really quite simple; Americans do not agree with the left in this country no matter the propaganda from the media or idiots like you.

Why are you so angry?

Why are you so stupid?

What gun laws would have prevented these tragedies?
 
#deflecting

Not at all; your question was dishonest and stupid. The notion that the Democratic Party of the Jackass as a whole does not want to ban ALL privately owned weapons and rescind the second amendment can only be expressed in a vacuum of reality and the facts.

Just because you pontificate strawmen doesn't mean we are obligated to not point at them and laugh snowflake.

It's obvious you are uneducated on nearly everything which is why you are compelled to lie, cry and construct strawmen.

WHAT gun laws would have prevented these tragedies?
 
Illinois Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky saying that an assault weapons ban is just the beginning. She also says that a complete ban on handguns could be possible through state and local action.

NY Governor Andrew Cuomo said in a radio interview in late December (audio below), “Confiscation could be an option…mandatory sale to the state could be an option.”

Dianne Feinstein, “If I could have banned them all – ‘Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns’ – I would have!”

Ed Koch said he wants to ban all guns for everyone except law enforcement.

Eric Holder doesn’t suggest banning or confiscating guns. He just thinks we should brainwash the American people into wanting to get rid of guns.


 
Not at all; your question was dishonest and stupid. The notion that the Democratic Party of the Jackass as a whole does not want to ban ALL privately owned weapons and rescind the second amendment can only be expressed in a vacuum of reality and the facts.

Just because you pontificate strawmen doesn't mean we are obligated to not point at them and laugh snowflake.

It's obvious you are uneducated on nearly everything which is why you are compelled to lie, cry and construct strawmen.

WHAT gun laws would have prevented these tragedies?

Why are you so angry? Is it because Liberals ended slavery?
 
I bet it's because you have buyer's remorse over Trump.

More stupid; you love wallowing in it don't you?

I have already predicted that Trump will win re-election and have openly stated I will be voting for him again. Is that too subtle for your tiny little head? :laugh:
 
You said that the majority of Americans don't want handguns banned. But nobody is saying they should be banned. So why did you bring this up? Was it to try to change the subject?

I quoted Gallup saying Americans don't want EITHER banned. So you, being an annoying moron, naturally responded by zeroing in on the least relevant part and challenging the point no one was making. Obviously, the quote was responding to the false claim that most Americans wanted a ban on "assault weapons." Go lay down, idiot.
 
This time it's Debra Messing. Another left-wing nut-job encouraging more bloodshed to assist the left-wing Dayton terrorist in his Constitution-shredding agenda.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/debra-messing-tweet-mitch-mcconnell-dana-loesch

Here are the comments. Where is Messing encouraging bloodshed?

The Volatile Mermaid @OhNoSheTwitnt


“If I get killed in a mass shooting please cremate me and throw my ashes into Mitch McConnell’s and Dana Loesch’s eyes while I’m still smoldering,” .

Debra Messing said in reply: "THIS. Yesssssssssss."

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/debra-messing-tweet-mitch-mcconnell-dana-loesch
 
I quoted Gallup saying Americans don't want EITHER banned. So you, being an annoying moron, naturally responded by zeroing in on the least relevant part and challenging the point no one was making. Obviously, the quote was responding to the false claim that most Americans wanted a ban on "assault weapons." Go lay down, idiot.

Well by posting that without context, you are implying that the Democrats are looking to ban all guns. Which I know you did on purpose, this is a common Republican talking-point. You're just a bit of a pussy, so you can't admit it now, which is fine.
 
You just posted it dumb-ass. :laugh:

Throwing smoldering ashes into people's eyes is known as assault, genius. Sarah Palin couldn't even say "reload" after an election loss without being accused of encouraging terrorism by you hyperventilating snowflake nut-jobs.

:laugh:
 
Well by posting that without context, you are implying that the Democrats are looking to ban all guns. Which I know you did on purpose, this is a common Republican talking-point. You're just a bit of a pussy, so you can't admit it now, which is fine.

In fact, NO, idiot...in the English language, those words arranged in that order in no way indicate anything about Democrats trying for a 100% ban. They only indicate that Americans don't want either kind of gun banned, and that you were too stupid to follow what was being claimed twice in a row now.

Jesus Christ, you are too dumb for adult interaction.

:palm:

Not that Democrats don't go out of their way to tell us at every turn that they ARE coming to take all our guns away.

View attachment 11211 View attachment 11212
 
Last edited:
Back
Top