Another psycho tranny plans school shooting

Ancient Greece is off limits? :rofl2: Why do you dismiss nature vs. nurture conundrum?
Sigh. You are actually, painfully stupid. There are not more gay Americans now than before. More gay Americans have come out of the closet because they took their civil rights from you fucking monsters.
 
Citation required.
Scroll up, dumbass.

 
Sigh. You are actually, painfully stupid. There are not more gay Americans now than before. More gay Americans have come out of the closet because they took their civil rights from you fucking monsters.
Yet, you can't prove that because of the nature vs. nurture conundrum.

Man boy sex was common in ancient Greece. Is that normal for homosexuals?
 
Yet, you can't prove that because of the nature vs. nurture conundrum.

Man boy sex was common in ancient Greece. Is that normal for homosexuals?
Brits are well known to have a lot of gays. How many times have you chosen to be gay, pup? You know, like Bunny Wigglesworth.

zorro-the-gay-blade-george-hamilton.gif
 
So 4. There have been 4 mass shootings by transgender people in 7 years. How many mass shootings have there been since 2018?

Apparently he won't answer you, so I will.

Not even since 2018. But in 2018 there were 323 mass shootings with 387 deaths and 1,283 injuries.

Here are the total number of mass shootings by year:
2018 - 323
2019 - 434
2020 - 611
2021 - 690
2022 - 644
2023 - 659
2024 - 505

For a total of 3,866 mass shootings in the US. 4 of those were by transgenders. For a total of 0.1%

FYI, transgenders makeup an estimated 0.5% to 1.6% of the US population.
 
Apparently he won't answer you, so I will. Not even since 2018. But in 2018 there were 323 mass shootings with 387 deaths and 1,283 injuries. Here are the total number of mass shootings by year: 2018 - 323 2019 - 434 2020 - 611 2021 - 690 2022 - 644 2023 - 659 2024 - 505 For a total of 3,866 mass shootings in the US. 4 of those were by transgenders. For a total of 0.1% FYI, transgenders makeup an estimated 0.5% to 1.6% of the US population.


Poor paw paw.

When someone argues that something isn't an issue because it's not widespread or frequent, they might be employing several logical fallacies:

  1. False Dichotomy (or False Dilemma): This fallacy occurs when only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there might be more options. Here, the argument implies that if something isn't widespread, it can't be an issue at all, ignoring the possibility that even rare occurrences could be significant or problematic.
    • Example: "Since only a small percentage of people are affected, it's not a problem."
  2. Appeal to Probability: This is a form of argument where the likelihood of an event is used to determine its validity or importance. Just because something doesn't happen often doesn't mean it isn't a significant issue when it does occur.
    • Example: "Since this crime is rare, we shouldn't worry about it."
  3. Minimization: This involves downplaying the significance of an event or issue based on its frequency rather than its impact or moral weight.
    • Example: "It's just a few cases, so it's not something to be concerned about."
  4. Straw Man: Sometimes, the argument can be structured to misrepresent the opposing view by suggesting that the other side claims the issue is widespread when they might only argue that it is significant regardless of prevalence.
    • Example: "They say it's an epidemic, but it's only happening in a few places."
  5. Denial of the Antecedent: This fallacy arises when one assumes that because a condition (widespread occurrence) is not met, the consequence (it being an issue) must be false. However, the absence of widespread occurrence does not logically preclude the existence of a problem.
    • Example: "If it were really a problem, it would be happening everywhere."
These fallacies can obscure the real issues by focusing on frequency rather than the qualitative aspects of the problem, such as its severity, impact, or moral implications.


@Grok

Roll, Tide!
 
Poor paw paw.

When someone argues that something isn't an issue because it's not widespread or frequent, they might be employing several logical fallacies:

  1. False Dichotomy (or False Dilemma): This fallacy occurs when only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there might be more options. Here, the argument implies that if something isn't widespread, it can't be an issue at all, ignoring the possibility that even rare occurrences could be significant or problematic.
    • Example: "Since only a small percentage of people are affected, it's not a problem."
  2. Appeal to Probability: This is a form of argument where the likelihood of an event is used to determine its validity or importance. Just because something doesn't happen often doesn't mean it isn't a significant issue when it does occur.
    • Example: "Since this crime is rare, we shouldn't worry about it."
  3. Minimization: This involves downplaying the significance of an event or issue based on its frequency rather than its impact or moral weight.
    • Example: "It's just a few cases, so it's not something to be concerned about."
  4. Straw Man: Sometimes, the argument can be structured to misrepresent the opposing view by suggesting that the other side claims the issue is widespread when they might only argue that it is significant regardless of prevalence.
    • Example: "They say it's an epidemic, but it's only happening in a few places."
  5. Denial of the Antecedent: This fallacy arises when one assumes that because a condition (widespread occurrence) is not met, the consequence (it being an issue) must be false. However, the absence of widespread occurrence does not logically preclude the existence of a problem.
    • Example: "If it were really a problem, it would be happening everywhere."
These fallacies can obscure the real issues by focusing on frequency rather than the qualitative aspects of the problem, such as its severity, impact, or moral implications.


@Grok

Roll, Tide!

I simply provided requested information that I thought you would not post. Spare me Logical Fallacies unless something I post fits.
 
Apparently he won't answer you, so I will.

Not even since 2018. But in 2018 there were 323 mass shootings with 387 deaths and 1,283 injuries.

Here are the total number of mass shootings by year:
2018 - 323
2019 - 434
2020 - 611
2021 - 690
2022 - 644
2023 - 659
2024 - 505

For a total of 3,866 mass shootings in the US. 4 of those were by transgenders. For a total of 0.1%

FYI, transgenders makeup an estimated 0.5% to 1.6% of the US population.
Here's the bigger question: How to prevent school shootings?

IMO, better mental healthcare including screening. Many of these shootings were telegraphed beforehand through social media, abused students, disciplinary problems, and other items previously mentioned in several studies including the Secret Service study previously posted. The problem seems to be legislative tying the hands of school authorities and reasonable corrective action to help the troubled students (i.e. better mental healthcare).

Let's not forget that Parkland HS shooter 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz had several years of multiple mental health issues. Still, he was legally allowed to own a guns, and owned several, since no adjudication had taken place nor did he receive enough help for his problems. The Democrats keep pushing strong gun laws, but that doesn't cure the problem of teen mental health issues where suicides are the bigger problem.


 
Here's the bigger question: How to prevent school shootings?

IMO, better mental healthcare including screening. Many of these shootings were telegraphed beforehand through social media, abused students, disciplinary problems, and other items previously mentioned in several studies including the Secret Service study previously posted. The problem seems to be legislative tying the hands of school authorities and reasonable corrective action to help the troubled students (i.e. better mental healthcare).

Let's not forget that Parkland HS shooter 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz had several years of multiple mental health issues. Still, he was legally allowed to own a guns, and owned several, since no adjudication had taken place nor did he receive enough help for his problems. The Democrats keep pushing strong gun laws, but that doesn't cure the problem of teen mental health issues where suicides are the bigger problem.


Not a transgender kid. :dunno:
 
Back
Top