another reason why cops should have their power curtailed

you got a GED cause you couldn't get into college you cousin kisser. He posed no threat to them with a nozzle. I know your such a pussy that a nozzle would scare you though.:good4u:

IF you went to any form of higher education, you should sue and see if you can't reclaim some of the money that was spent; because you're to stupid to know the difference between a "hose" an a "nozzle".
 
IF you went to any form of higher education, you should sue and see if you can't reclaim some of the money that was spent; because you're to stupid to know the difference between a "hose" an a "nozzle".

I'm smart enough to know your a working class moron.
 
Cops should be subjected to constant video surveillance, and laws should be in place that allow for any citizen to videotape or audiotape cops at any time. We give them great power, with that comes certain inconvenient checks on that power. If we do not place checks on that power we're cripplingly stupid.
 
Cops should be subjected to constant video surveillance, and laws should be in place that allow for any citizen to videotape or audiotape cops at any time. We give them great power, with that comes certain inconvenient checks on that power. If we do not place checks on that power we're cripplingly stupid.

Yes. Keep blaming the victims.
 
* Act one was the sheriff's office doing something stupid against his wife involving false charges. Those got dropped.

* Joel files a public records request for details on the case after the charges are dropped. The sheriff's office tries to overcharge him for the data. He fights that, wins.

* He goes to the sheriff's office to meet with the same moron of a "public affairs officer" who had tried to overcharge him for the data. Joel gets permission to pack first. On meeting with the public affairs guy to get the data, the public affairs cop literally attacks Joel the moment he sees Joel's legally holstered gun. It was admittedly a mild attack but if any of us stripped somebody of their weapons like that we'd be lawfully shot. Public affairs guy threatens to yank Joel's permit, apologizes for the assault, asks Joel to put his guns in Joel's car. Joel complies, comes back in, gets his data.

* Over the next month Joel complains about the assault (including his hidden-cam video of said assault!). He makes a formal complaint to the sheriff, he talks publicly about it, he makes the video public:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LpuUlYMXaU"]YouTube - 2010-11-04 13 47 40 (2).mp4[/ame] - the first two minutes are the most relevant.

* A couple of days after that Joel and the guy who assaulted him do a joint press conference:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWx72fsriWs"]YouTube - Joint Joel Rosenberg Minneapolis Police Department Press Statement 1010010[/ame]

He's not pulling any punches...

* All of this pisses off the sheriff's office no end. It takes 'em another month or so to figure out what they can possibly charge Joel with to do damage control and payback. The latest charges are what they were able to scrape up. For a bunch of reasons, if the law of that state is followed it's not going to work and Joel is going to come out of this with major, major cash for assault, false arrest, malicious prosecution, 2A violations and more.
 
"A Clayton County police officer was on foot patrol on North Shore Drive when the dog jumped off a porch and started barking and running toward the officer, Capt. Tina Daniel said. The officer ordered the dog to stop and when it didn't, the officer shot and killed the animal in its yard, Daniel said.

The police department has launched an internal investigation into the incident and will not discuss the incident until it is completed, Sgt. Otis Willis said Monday afternoon.

The officer, whose name was not released, was responding to a call reporting a suspicious person, police said."

http://www.ajc.com/news/clayton/cop-shoots-kills-family-782080.html
 
Back
Top