Another suicide Victim of the Clintons!
- Thread starter Wolverine
- Start date
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
Oh I won't believe me.
One wishes that this power the Clintons have would work in other areas. Like finding a brain in a conservative's head? Or wondering what exactly Steve Bannon does aside from talk shat? Or giving some strength to our weak and insecure president, so he would stop wasting bandwidth tweeting the wrong people? But no instead they cause suicides, ah, but there lies a thought.......
I have to wonder seriously is this an American posting dumb shat or is this a Russian troll? Of course little difference I guess.
"I say it to you now, knowing full well that you will agree with me (that is, understand) only if you already agree with me." Stanley Fish
"I want to argue for something which is controversial, although I believe that it is also intuitive and commonsensical. My claim is this: Oliver [ average Right Winger] believes what he does because that is the kind of thinker he is or, to put it more bluntly, because there is something wrong with how he thinks. The problem with conspiracy theorists is not, as the US legal scholar Cass Sunstein argues, that they have little relevant information. The key to what they end up believing is how they interpret and respond to the vast quantities of relevant information at their disposal. I want to suggest that this is fundamentally a question of the way they are. Oliver isn’t mad (or at least, he needn’t be). Nevertheless, his beliefs about 9/11 are the result of the peculiarities of his intellectual constitution – in a word, of his intellectual character." https://aeon.co/essays/the-intellectual-character-of-conspiracy-theorists
http://timharford.com/2017/03/the-problem-with-facts/
"Dr. Jeanson calls himself a “presuppositionalist evidentialist” — which we might define as someone who accepts evidence when it happens to affirm his nonnegotiable presuppositions. “When it comes to questions of absolute truth, those are things I’ve settled in my own mind and heart,” he told me. “I couldn’t call myself a Christian if I hadn’t.” https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/...ngelical-roots-of-our-post-truth-society.html
and https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/01/opinion/sunday/stop-saying-i-feel-like.html
I have to wonder seriously is this an American posting dumb shat or is this a Russian troll? Of course little difference I guess.
"I say it to you now, knowing full well that you will agree with me (that is, understand) only if you already agree with me." Stanley Fish
"I want to argue for something which is controversial, although I believe that it is also intuitive and commonsensical. My claim is this: Oliver [ average Right Winger] believes what he does because that is the kind of thinker he is or, to put it more bluntly, because there is something wrong with how he thinks. The problem with conspiracy theorists is not, as the US legal scholar Cass Sunstein argues, that they have little relevant information. The key to what they end up believing is how they interpret and respond to the vast quantities of relevant information at their disposal. I want to suggest that this is fundamentally a question of the way they are. Oliver isn’t mad (or at least, he needn’t be). Nevertheless, his beliefs about 9/11 are the result of the peculiarities of his intellectual constitution – in a word, of his intellectual character." https://aeon.co/essays/the-intellectual-character-of-conspiracy-theorists
http://timharford.com/2017/03/the-problem-with-facts/
"Dr. Jeanson calls himself a “presuppositionalist evidentialist” — which we might define as someone who accepts evidence when it happens to affirm his nonnegotiable presuppositions. “When it comes to questions of absolute truth, those are things I’ve settled in my own mind and heart,” he told me. “I couldn’t call myself a Christian if I hadn’t.” https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/...ngelical-roots-of-our-post-truth-society.html
and https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/01/opinion/sunday/stop-saying-i-feel-like.html