ANTIFA: Berkley again.

the group of more than 100 hooded protesters, with shields emblazoned with the words “no hate” and waving a flag identifying themselves as anarchists, busted through police lines, avoiding security checks by officers to take away possible weapons. ...

violence erupted when left-wing protesters surrounded and attacked at least five right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley......

Several thousand people had congregated for a “Rally Against Hate” in response to the planned right-wing protest that raised concerns of violence and triggered a massive police presence.

Once anarchists arrived, it was clear there would not be dueling protests between left and right so he ordered his officers out of the park and allowed the anarchists to march in.

There was “no need for a confrontation over a grass patch,” Greenwood said.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/27...ing-rally.html
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism


Anarchism is a political philosophy that advocates self-governed societies based on voluntary institutions. These are often described as stateless societies,[1][2][3][4] although several authors have defined them more specifically as institutions based on non-hierarchical free associations.[5][6][7][8] Anarchism holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.[9][10]
While anti-statism is central,[11] anarchism specifically entails opposing authority or hierarchical organisation in the conduct of all human relations, including, but not limited to, the state system. Anarchism is usually considered an extreme left-wing ideology,[12][13] and much of anarchist economics and anarchist legal philosophy reflects anti-authoritarian interpretations of communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.[14]
Anarchism does not offer a fixed body of doctrine from a single particular world view, instead fluxing and flowing as a philosophy.[15] Many types and traditions of anarchism exist, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[16] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism.[10] Strains of anarchism have often been divided into the categories of social and individualist anarchism or similar dual classifications.[17

this
 
They are NOT autiomatically antifa if they say they are anarchists idiots


its a perfect thing for anarchists to do



and you are doing the anrachists bidding by taking the bait.


you will help them create chaos because you have no set morals
 
Antifaschistische Aktion, an umbrella organisation for militant anti-fascists in Germany, was formed in 1932. It was sometimes called "Antifa". Although it did not survive the war, local anti-fascist committees were formed across Germany, typically by veterans of this organisation, as Nazi rule crumbled in 1944, under the name "Antifa".[1]


they were heros in germany huh
 
Antifaschistische Aktion, an umbrella organisation for militant anti-fascists in Germany, was formed in 1932. It was sometimes called "Antifa". Although it did not survive the war, local anti-fascist committees were formed across Germany, typically by veterans of this organisation, as Nazi rule crumbled in 1944, under the name "Antifa".[1]


they were heros in germany huh

Trying to handle the Antifa turd by the clean end lol?

Keep going, amuse me further.
 
becuase of your cock stroking of neo nazis the Name has re-emmerged



give me people who will FIGHT nazis any day



they should not create chaos and they should not strike first.



they have saved lives but you will lie about that
 
Trying to handle the Antifa turd by the clean end lol?

Keep going, amuse me further.

Antifaschistische Aktion, an umbrella organisation for militant anti-fascists in Germany, was formed in 1932. It was sometimes called "Antifa". Although it did not survive the war, local anti-fascist committees were formed across Germany, typically by veterans of this organisation, as Nazi rule crumbled in 1944, under the name "Antifa".[1]


they were heros in germany huh
 
the group of more than 100 hooded protesters, with shields emblazoned with the words “no hate” and waving a flag identifying themselves as anarchists, busted through police lines, avoiding security checks by officers to take away possible weapons. ...

violence erupted when left-wing protesters surrounded and attacked at least five right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley......

Several thousand people had congregated for a “Rally Against Hate” in response to the planned right-wing protest that raised concerns of violence and triggered a massive police presence.

Once anarchists arrived, it was clear there would not be dueling protests between left and right so he ordered his officers out of the park and allowed the anarchists to march in.

There was “no need for a confrontation over a grass patch,” Greenwood said.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/2...ck-clad-anarchists-storm-rightwing-rally.html

Taking the bolded part and asking the question of:
Does anyone else see a lawsuit in the possible future, against the Berkley Police Department and their Chief of Police?
 
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...ters_at_berkeley_say_no_to_marxism_rally.html



Not finding anyone to fight with among the peaceful protesters, antifa thugs attacked anyway. The result was chaos, thanks to a curious reluctance on the part of Berkeley*police to intervene until the lives of the anti-Communist protesters were actually in danger.


ANTIFA is a Terrorist Org.

What does everyone want to do, wait until some nut job has had enough and opens fire or someone who's being attacked defends themselves?

How many bodies does the left want to see, shot dead in the streets; before they take action to end this?
 
Will no one denounce these fascist thugs?

The left can't and won't.

They can't; because they don't want to alienate themselves from those they support.
AND
They won't; because they want, need, demand a victory; no matter what it is, how it's achieved, or the cost of lives.
 
Back
Top