Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Me and Superfreak - BFF!
ROFLMAO....
though I first choked on the water I was drinking. Thank God I wasn't eating a pretzel too.
Any Good Christians here?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
ROFLMAO....
though I first choked on the water I was drinking. Thank God I wasn't eating a pretzel too.
Beefy
Worst gambler ever
KingRaw!
I dare you to stop us GL
And they make the dumbest arguments like until you can prove that one gay couple out of half a million wants to adopt a child, then you can't make a case that gay adoption will reduce the numbers of orphans that need to be adopted. And when you prove them wrong, a corrupt mod will ban you for a week.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Study the Council of Nicea, 325 AD, where Jesus was voted in as the Son of God.
Did you know that King James was a homosexual pedophile who thought Jesus was in love with John?
Religion is for the weak .. seriously weak of mind.
Did you know that King James was a homosexual pedophile who thought Jesus was in love with John?
Religion is for the weak .. seriously weak of mind.
Battleborne
Terminator
King James was in 325AD...or were you referring to the council as a separate issue...please post the thesis written about this claim of yours...that would be nice!
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
King James was in 325AD...or were you referring to the council as a separate issue...please post the thesis written about this claim of yours...that would be nice!
You're the christian .. don't you know .. or did you just put on your mamas religion like a old pair of shoes like most people do?
CLEARLY, they are two seperate issues in a plethora of issues that determine that religion is for fools.
Do your own research .. I don't like you enough to do it for you.
You're a bimbo.
Last edited:
Battleborne
Terminator
Well being that...........
I am a non practicing Roman Catholic but a believer non the same...I have never heard much less read this claim of yours...please prove it to me and all other readers of this board...this is a serious accusation...must see the facts...LE hat off for the answer!
side note:the feeling is mutual...I don't like or respect you either...however you made the claim...prove it!
I am a non practicing Roman Catholic but a believer non the same...I have never heard much less read this claim of yours...please prove it to me and all other readers of this board...this is a serious accusation...must see the facts...LE hat off for the answer!
side note:the feeling is mutual...I don't like or respect you either...however you made the claim...prove it!
Last edited:
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
There is this thing called goggle.
But don't feel bad .. most christians don't know shit about christian history.
Battleborne
Terminator
Okay, please note the difference between the First Council of Nicea, which was called to make a unified doctrine, and the second council which met primarily to restore icons which were rejected in the Byzantine Empire.
Note here, BAC especially, that the argument wasn't whether he was Divine, but whether he was made of exactly the same stuff as God, or merely something close to it. In other words were Christ and God the same or separate entities. This is where the "Trinity" or the "Three in One" was first brought forward as doctrine. There wasn't an argument about the divinity of Christ, it was over whether he was simply God, or Divine but separate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea
They voted overwhelmingly in favor of the Trinity, all but two voted against the Arian doctrine of equal and different...
The idea that they just then came to the conclusion of his Divinity is a misrepresentation of the council and what the "debate" was. They also exaggerate the actual "debate". The idea of separate but equal Deities was so soundly defeated that it would almost be ridiculous to call it a debate.
(BTW - I would agree with BAC about most Christians knowledge of the history of the religion, but I would also state that often those against the religion are often misled by quick reads that promote a negative side to things, such as an exaggeration and misconception of the first council of Nicea.)
Note here, BAC especially, that the argument wasn't whether he was Divine, but whether he was made of exactly the same stuff as God, or merely something close to it. In other words were Christ and God the same or separate entities. This is where the "Trinity" or the "Three in One" was first brought forward as doctrine. There wasn't an argument about the divinity of Christ, it was over whether he was simply God, or Divine but separate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea
They voted overwhelmingly in favor of the Trinity, all but two voted against the Arian doctrine of equal and different...
The idea that they just then came to the conclusion of his Divinity is a misrepresentation of the council and what the "debate" was. They also exaggerate the actual "debate". The idea of separate but equal Deities was so soundly defeated that it would almost be ridiculous to call it a debate.
(BTW - I would agree with BAC about most Christians knowledge of the history of the religion, but I would also state that often those against the religion are often misled by quick reads that promote a negative side to things, such as an exaggeration and misconception of the first council of Nicea.)