any healthcare bill MUST have a recorded vote

[Jarod]

you are purposefully ignoring the wording and context, not that I can blame you. who wants to be proven wrong?

I'm sure it will also, and be immediately challenged in the courts.



why wasn't it?

I dont know except that it was clearly constitutional.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

toppy must throw insults when he's been thoroughly slammed by someone who didn't go to college.

spinster never went to college and lives in mom's basement...its why he is so insecure about education and trashes everyone elese

 

[Topspin]

spinster never went to college and lives in mom's basement...its why he is so insecure about education and trashes everyone elese

they are going to use reconcilliation moron, if you are a lawyer you have to be the dumbest one I've ever run accross. Prob the poorest too.

 

[Bonestorm]

you said pelosi challenged in court, where is the link for pelosi's challenge?

She, along with a few other Democratic representatives, filed an amicus brief.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

you are purposefully ignoring the wording and context, not that I can blame you. who wants to be proven wrong?

I'm sure it will also, and be immediately challenged in the courts.



why wasn't it?

unfortunately it has been ruled constitutional...

Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 (1892)

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

She, along with a few other Democratic representatives, filed an amicus brief.

that is not "challenging" something in court, you obviously are clueless on what amicus briefs are...the petitioner of the case is the one who challenges, amicus merely offers support.

you're welcome for your free educational lesson of the day

 

[SmarterthanYou]

unfortunately it has been ruled constitutional...

Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 (1892)

yeah, i read that case. I repeat, the courts will not allow this ruling about simple terms or punctuation to apply to two totally different bills.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

more whambulancing

No doubt. I think he's forgetting that the bill has all ready passed both houses.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

yeah, i read that case. I repeat, the courts will not allow this ruling about simple terms or punctuation to apply to two totally different bills.

please elaborate, i'm interested to see how you distinguish the two scenarios, now and back then and the citizen case

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

No doubt. I think he's forgetting that the bill has all ready passed both houses.

?

when, i see nothing of this in the news....please provide a link

 

[TuTu Monroe]

I would never give them the satisfaction of even thinking I was. After watching your idiocy, I wouldn't want people confusing me with having a retard degree.

HAHAHA, I can't help it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

please elaborate, i'm interested to see how you distinguish the two scenarios, now and back then and the citizen case

in the original case, the contestation was about minor terms as the difference in bills. The courts accepted both bills because the end result was the same. They were accepted with enrolled endorsements, or actual recorded votes. If this bill is not voted on in the house, just 'deemed' passed, the courts will have to ignore the original case as precedent because there is no endorsed roll call and vote.

now, if the house actually has a recorded vote, don't bother challenging unless a good argument can be brought forward that the bill exceeds the powers of congress.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

From a political and practical standpoint, at least, anything other than a record vote would be a disaster for the Dem party nationally. From the perspective of an individual congressman, it could help moderate Democrats obfuscate their vote. Or it could actually help the Republicans pin the bill on the whole Democratic party, hurting people who've been staunchly against it like Gene Taylor (although I doubt Taylor could lose in a million years).