Any JPP liberals want to explain all of these??

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
BBNZ7hZ.img


This is why "Innocent, until PROVEN guilty" is so important.

Joseph Abbitt….convicted rape, witness ID, served 14 years….exonerated with DNA.
Warith Abdal….convicted rape, witness ID, served 16 years….exonerated with DNA.
Christopher Abernathy….convicted rape, false accusation, served 28 years….exonerated with DNA.
Darryl Adams….convicted rape, false accusation, served 15 years….exonerated with DNA.
Jarrett Adams….convicted rape, false accusation, served 7 years….exonerated with DNA.
Kenneth Adams….convicted rape, witness ID, served 18 years….exonerated with DNA.
Gilbert Alejandro…convicted rape, false accusation, served 4 years….exonerated with DNA.
Malcolm Alexander….convicted rape, false accusation, served 38 years….exonerated DNA.
Richard Alexander….convicted rape, witness ID, served 3 years….exonerated DNA.
Albert Algarin….convicted rape, false accusation, served 5 years….exonerated DNA.
George Allen….convicted rape, false accusation, served 30 years….exonerated DNA.
Daniel Anderson….convicted rape, false accusation, served 33 years….exonerated DNA.
Marvin Anderson….convicted rape, witness ID, served 20 years….exonerated DNA.
Randolph Arledge….convicted rape, false accusation, served 29 years….exonerated DNA.
Ralph Armstrong….convicted rape, false accusation, served 28 years….exonerated DNA.
Richard Armstrong….convicted rape, false accusation, served 6 years….exonerated
Herman Atkins….convicted rape, witness ID, served 12 years….exonerated DNA.
Kenneth Atkins….convicted rape, false accusation, served 4 years….exonerated
Steven Avery….convicted rape, witness ID, served 18 years….exonerated DNA.
Anselmo Aviles….convicted rape, witness ID, served 8 years….exonerated
David Ayers….convicted rape, false accusation, served 11 years….exonerated DNA.
Randall Ayers….convicted rape, witness ID, served 8 years….exonerated.

AND that is just the “A’s” from the National Registry of Exonerations.

:facepalm:
 
Kav proved he was a Partisan Hack. His performance at the job interview showed he didn't have what it takes to be an IMPARTIAL judge.

The 'Red Team/Blue Team' mentality that is destroying America, is now seeping into the Supreme Court. What do you think Blue Team will do when the roles are reversed?
What is wrong with reaching a COMPROMISE everyone can live with?

Russia, China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia ... are laughing and laughing, and laughing and laughing and laughing and ...
 
Kav proved he was a Partisan Hack. His performance at the job interview showed he didn't have what it takes to be an IMPARTIAL judge.

The 'Red Team/Blue Team' mentality that is destroying America, is now seeping into the Supreme Court. What do you think Blue Team will do when the roles are reversed?
What is wrong with reaching a COMPROMISE everyone can live with?

Russia, China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia ... are laughing and laughing, and laughing and laughing and laughing and ...

You think it's just now "seeping" into the SC? Kagan and Sotomayor are out in the media today complaining that the SC may no longer have a swing vote. Why would the SC need a swing vote if it's full of impartial justices?
 
You think it's just now "seeping" into the SC? Kagan and Sotomayor are out in the media today complaining that the SC may no longer have a swing vote. Why would the SC need a swing vote if it's full of impartial justices?

I'm sure they all have their particular persuasions like the rest of us, but they don't wear it on their sleeves. Kav's rant about "The Clintons" and "Trump's Election", and "The Left" eliminated any doubt that he could be an IMPARTIAL judge.

If I was a Country that couldn't defeat the US Militarily, I would try and find a different means. A good example would be the 9/11 Terrorists. Using American Planes to destroy the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Using our own assets against us.

Turning the US into a 'Red Team/Blue Team' sporting-type mentality divides the Country to where it becomes paralyzed.

(Any chance Blue Team will cut Trump a little slack when it comes to his finances?)
 
I'm sure they all have their particular persuasions like the rest of us, but they don't wear it on their sleeves. Kav's rant about "The Clintons" and "Trump's Election", and "The Left" eliminated any doubt that he could be an IMPARTIAL judge.

If I was a Country that couldn't defeat the US Militarily, I would try and find a different means. A good example would be the 9/11 Terrorists. Using American Planes to destroy the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Using our own assets against us.

Turning the US into a 'Red Team/Blue Team' sporting-type mentality divides the Country to where it becomes paralyzed.

(Any chance Blue Team will cut Trump a little slack when it comes to his finances?)

Do you ever have any doubt how Kagan and Sotomayor are going to rule on a case? The SC has never been impartial.
 
Do you ever have any doubt how Kagan and Sotomayor are going to rule on a case? The SC has never been impartial.

They were confirmed with Republican votes. They didn't rant about a 'Right-wing Conspiracy'. They had the ability to appear 'impartial', Kav ... not so much.
 
I'm sure they all have their particular persuasions like the rest of us, but they don't wear it on their sleeves. Kav's rant about "The Clintons" and "Trump's Election", and "The Left" eliminated any doubt that he could be an IMPARTIAL judge.

If I was a Country that couldn't defeat the US Militarily, I would try and find a different means. A good example would be the 9/11 Terrorists. Using American Planes to destroy the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Using our own assets against us.

Turning the US into a 'Red Team/Blue Team' sporting-type mentality divides the Country to where it becomes paralyzed.

(Any chance Blue Team will cut Trump a little slack when it comes to his finances?)

ginsburg literally went on air and told people not to vote trump
 
I'm not aware of that.

That's not exactly what she said:

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

It reminded her of something her husband, Martin D. Ginsburg, a prominent tax lawyer who died in 2010, would have said.

“‘Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand,’” Justice Ginsburg said, smiling ruefully.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/...an-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html

Later in that article she said something else you may be interested in:

Should Judge Garland or another Democratic appointee join the court, Justice Ginsburg will find herself in a new position, and the thought seemed to please her.

“It means that I’ll be among five more often than among four,” she said.

Yep. gotta love that impartiality.
 
So what?



They didn't have to.



And here it is, appearance is what matters.

Nothing you just said answers the question I asked.

1. It shows a bipartisanship.
2. Exactly.
3. I have no idea how Kagan or Sotomayor are going to vote. They seem 'Liberal' types but haven't claimed there is a'Right-wing Conspiracy', nor blamed 'The Trumps' are behind anything.
 
1. It shows a bipartisanship.
2. Exactly.
3. I have no idea how Kagan or Sotomayor are going to vote. They seem 'Liberal' types but haven't claimed there is a'Right-wing Conspiracy', nor blamed 'The Trumps' are behind anything.

I just quoted Ginsburg for you in my next post.
 
No, it wasn't. This was long after her "job interview" when she no longer had to pretend to be unbiased.

Yeah. So when Kavanaugh is seated it won't surprise you when he comes out and begins blasting 'The Clintons' and 'The Left-wing Conspiracy'? He seems to be an extremist, not even able to hold himself in check.
 
Yeah. So when Kavanaugh is seated it won't surprise you when he comes out and begins blasting 'The Clintons' and 'The Left-wing Conspiracy'? He seems to be an extremist, not even able to hold himself in check.

That is still not an answer to the question I asked you.
 
BBNZ7hZ.img


This is why "Innocent, until PROVEN guilty" is so important.

Joseph Abbitt….convicted rape, witness ID, served 14 years….exonerated with DNA.
Warith Abdal….convicted rape, witness ID, served 16 years….exonerated with DNA.
Christopher Abernathy….convicted rape, false accusation, served 28 years….exonerated with DNA.
Darryl Adams….convicted rape, false accusation, served 15 years….exonerated with DNA.
Jarrett Adams….convicted rape, false accusation, served 7 years….exonerated with DNA.
Kenneth Adams….convicted rape, witness ID, served 18 years….exonerated with DNA.
Gilbert Alejandro…convicted rape, false accusation, served 4 years….exonerated with DNA.
Malcolm Alexander….convicted rape, false accusation, served 38 years….exonerated DNA.
Richard Alexander….convicted rape, witness ID, served 3 years….exonerated DNA.
Albert Algarin….convicted rape, false accusation, served 5 years….exonerated DNA.
George Allen….convicted rape, false accusation, served 30 years….exonerated DNA.
Daniel Anderson….convicted rape, false accusation, served 33 years….exonerated DNA.
Marvin Anderson….convicted rape, witness ID, served 20 years….exonerated DNA.
Randolph Arledge….convicted rape, false accusation, served 29 years….exonerated DNA.
Ralph Armstrong….convicted rape, false accusation, served 28 years….exonerated DNA.
Richard Armstrong….convicted rape, false accusation, served 6 years….exonerated
Herman Atkins….convicted rape, witness ID, served 12 years….exonerated DNA.
Kenneth Atkins….convicted rape, false accusation, served 4 years….exonerated
Steven Avery….convicted rape, witness ID, served 18 years….exonerated DNA.
Anselmo Aviles….convicted rape, witness ID, served 8 years….exonerated
David Ayers….convicted rape, false accusation, served 11 years….exonerated DNA.
Randall Ayers….convicted rape, witness ID, served 8 years….exonerated.

AND that is just the “A’s” from the National Registry of Exonerations.

:facepalm:

Good reason to get rid of one of the right’s favorite things, the death penalty, isn’t it?
 
Back
Top