Let it. The people are Russian.
LMAO
Let it. The people are Russian.
"Ukraine" isn't much of a country anyways. It's been two, or more, for hundreds of years. Likely the Eastern half is all Putin will concern himself with. And even if he doesn't, so what? We don't go hounding the British over Northern Ireland. We don't pester the French about Corsica or Brittany, the Canadians over Quebec. America isn't the arbiter of who isn't and isn't a country.
kinda sounds like iraq that was an attempt to force three disparate groups into one nation ad we know how that worked out
oh well

Yep; oh well. Nothing the world can do about the Soviet era tactics of Putin. We know everyone laughs at Kerry and Obama and their "red lines".
NOT QUITE. the rest of the western nations are not on board with putin and economic barriers, like banning russia from western banking, can have a long term effect on the russian economy. unfortunately, the key term is 'long term'. and russia is not without economic power of its own, i.e., oil and natural gas. of course it also depends on just how much the other nations care.
I could have sworn Iraq was a single nation before we invaded?? Whoddathunkit!!!
![]()
I wouldn't count on anything tough coming from the neutered West or neutered AmeriKa; were falling back to the old cold war dictate of "spheres of influence" and this is the Soviets playground for the last 9 decades or so.
it was/is and look what a mess we have left it in
you mean like when the ussr dissolved...
Key words; we have LEFT it in. Of course, this also resumes a nation carved out by the ambitions of European Imperialist ambitions hasnt been a mess throughout its history. That, of course, would require the willing suspension of disbelief.
it almost makes me long for the sadahm regime, at least he kept a modicum of order, however, his children would have made a bigger mess of things so maybe we should have partitioned the nation back into its three major power blocks.
So you were okay with his invasions of neighboring countries, gassing of innocent Kurds and wanton murder of anyone he felt like killing? Fascinating; I can see why giving Iraqi's a representative Democracy is so much worse.
somehow i do not think that the iraqi's want a representative democracy...unless they are in control of it.
just out of curiosity, how many iraqi's are being killed by bombs on a regular basis since the representative democracy has been implemented?
fanatics on all sides will not accept anything that does not put them in charge.
do you see a solution to the mess that is iraq these days?
That’s a fascinating claim made in a vacuum of the facts. How does someone become so uninformed?
Turnout for Iraq election solid at 62 percent
BY RANIA EL GAMAL AND AHMED RASHEED
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/08/us-iraq-election-idUSLDE62505A20100308
You don’t know how to do a google search?
112,667–123,284 civilian deaths from violence; March 2003 to March 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
So therefore we should try nothing?
No; not after we pulled out all of our troops. Thanks to Obummer, I expect things to continue to deteriorate in Iraq until we see another dictatorial regime installed after a brutal devastating civil war like we are seeing in Syria.
Nice to know Democrats don’t care about the sacrifice made by our troops to secure Iraq and provide them with a representative Government. Obama’s foreign policy is the exact disaster we expected it to be and predicted it would be.