AOC calls on the government to ban Tucker Carlson and other Fox hosts

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
:whoa: :palm: YOU ARE CORRECT ABOUT THE FIRST SENTENCE (a moot point). The rest of your screed is pure revisionist "logic" on your part, as there is no "argument" based on the FACTS that Hitler and Stalin were buddies doing trade and such. Perhaps you should avail yourself to the history of WWI, then you would understand why there was a "non-aggression" pact signed by the 2 countries (that Hitler latter broke) by WW2. A similar situation with Mussolini (diplomatic relations by chancellors) that went out the window when Mussolini hooked up with Hitler by WWII.

Had you done your homework (paid attention in school), you would have noted that communist were on the hit list of fascist Germany and Italy. And what's truly laughable is your attempt to paint fascism as a "liberal" by pointing to such things as "public transportation" (it wasn't for free, don't cha know). Or public works programs (necessary for an economy near depression, similar to the latter WPA program in America), anti-tobacco (get educated on America's discovery of the tobacco industry lying about health hazards, the FDA & Nader).

Hell, our constitution is liberal at it's base....rights for all, freedom for all, on par legal protections, right to bear arms, etc. Yet we are a die hard DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, not fascist or communist or even socialist to a large degree. Capitalism is America's supporting strut.

As for Hitler's & Mussolini's fascism: https://brill.com/view/journals/fasc...ml?language=en

Socialism, Communism, Capitalism .... they all share some rudimentary trait necessary to maintain a functioning society....HOW THEY DO SO in their entirety is a whole other smoke.

So bottom line: Capitalism does not automatically equal fascism or totalitarianism. Socialism does not automatically equal communism. Communism does not automatically equal totalitarianism per s
e, as there are various degrees of such that can be applied to "strong man" gov't like Libya under Ghaddafi as opposed to China's former "gang of four". Capice'?



Maybe you should actually READ the links you post. That one on Brill, is all about German-Italian relations in the Hitler-Mussolini period with a discussion about racism tossed in. It has nothing to do with Italian-Russian (Soviet) relations.

As for the rest of your screed, it is nothing but a factless rehash of the same talking points you've previously made with no supporting evidence. It is nothing but a Definist fallacy where you expect everyone to simply agree that you are correct because that's the 'common wisdom' or some other nonsense.

1. I never implied that it did, genius. But if you're interested in that relationship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo-Soviet_Pact Again, we see that fascist Italy and communist Russia were NOT solid allies by WWII, much less mutual arms dealing and trading. And as you'll note, Italy broke the pact.

Now I do wish you would GTFU and stop pretending that any documentation I present is "factless". That's your department, bozo. You keep vomiting up your revisionist clap trap and semi-ignorant ramblings about history and definitive terminology as if it's on par with valid, documented source material of history (hint: it isn't). That you enter the neologistic world of ITN with "definist fallacy" clearly renders any further attempt at rational, logical debate with you as pointless.

Conceding a point or admitting you're wrong on an anonymous format won't kill you, bunky. No one knows who your are in the real world, much less give a damn.

But do continue to carry water for the likes of Carlson, a trust fund kid with delusions of grandeur who uses you like a doormat. He LIES TO YOU YOU, ya blithering bumpkin! The Dominion court case PROVED that. That's why Murdoch gave him the heave-ho....he'd become a documented liability! Deal with it.

You're done here. Catch you on some other thread.
 
translation: Guillermo picks up the gauntlet for another poster, yet he CANNOT meet a simple request regarding his initial assertion ... of which he just regurgitates here his personal interpretation of what TAG was thinking....NOT what in my links he can logically & factually prove to be "complete shit".

That's the problem with right wing/MAGA wonks .... was put on the spot to logically and factually explain/prover their SPECIFIC assertions, they instead double down on generalities, dodges and then project their own short comings on others. They only convince themselves and the jokers they see in the mirror,

The chronology of the posts exposes TDG's errors. Guillermo just adds bluff & buster to that failure. Typical of him, of which he now embellish in up coming posts.

No it doesn't. I read through the whole thing. Being grandiose doesn't make you right, you're not always wrong just wrong most of the time. Your "evidence" was unconvincing. There's a way to correct that, stop shit posting.
 
Well, you'll all be dead in the next 10-20 years, so I don't particularly care anymore about you idiots who think liberalism is evil. You lost. The enemies of progress always lose in the long run.

The fascism you push is the opposite of "liberal."

I am a liberal, you are a totalitarian thug.
 
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” — Benito Mussolini

What page in Il Fascisti can I find that quote on?

Or if not there, what issue of Avanti is it in?

7k56st.jpg


china is also using fascism.

As did Stalin and the USSR.
 
Oh, you're bitching about the COVID vaccine. How predictable.


Actually, he was opposing totalitarianism - which you support.

We strongly encourage you and the other fascists here to get the clot shot - daily boosters are needed to prove your faithfulness to the Reich.
 
yes. most nations are fascist today, with their governments being de facto controlled by pharmaceutical and arms manufacture cartels..

Crony Capitalism and fascism are very different things.

China is true fascism - the state is supreme and companies operate ONLY with the permission of the state.
 
I am laughing at you.

that's textbook fascism.

neocon / neoliberal supply side libertarian corporate internationalist fascist job creator worship is a general belief that the government should generally favorite corporate interests, but that has all gone too far as well.
 
bank bailouts are fascims too.

JPMorgan Chase to buy most First Republic assets after bank fails
https://www.cnn.com › 2023 › 05 › 01 › business › first-republic-purchase-hnk-intl › index.html
TodayJPMorgan Chase said it had acquired the substantial majority of assets and assumed the deposits and certain other liabilities of First Republic Bank from the FDIC. The FDIC took control of the...
JPMorgan buys First Republic Bank sale: What you need to know
https://www.politico.com › news › 2023 › 05 › 01 › jpmorgan-first-republic-sale-what-you-need-to-know-00094644
Today05/01/2023 12:56 PM EDT. The agreement by JPMorgan Chase to buy struggling First Republic Bank was designed to put an end to the turbulence that has rocked the banking industry for over a month ...
JPMorgan Chase buys First Republic in bid to end bank turmoil
https://www.politico.com › news › 2023 › 05 › 01 › jpmorgan-chase-first-republic-fdic-00094622
TodayIn its release, JPMorgan said it has bought $173 billion in loans and $30 billion in securities. It will also assume $92 billion in deposits, "including $30 billion of large bank deposits,...
First Republic Bank taken over by FDIC and sold to JPMorgan - NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › business › business-news › first-republic-bank-fdic-takeover-sold-jp-morgan-rcna81437
TodayThe Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. announced simultaneously Monday morning that it had seized the bank and that JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in America, would be purchasing substantially...
JPMorgan Chase buys troubled First Republic Bank after US government ...
https://www.opb.org › article › 2023 › 05 › 01 › jpmorgan-chase-first-republic-bank
TodayUpdated May 1, 2023 at 9:31 AM ET. JPMorgan Chase has bought failed First Republic Bank's deposits and a "substantial amount of their assets and certain liabilities," JPMorgan Chase said in a ...
JPMorgan Chase Agrees To Acquire First Republic Bank's Deposits After ...
https://www.forbes.com › sites › siladityaray › 2023 › 05 › 01 › jpmorgan-chase-agrees-to-acquire-first-republic-banks-deposits-after-fdic-intervenes
TodayJPMorgan Chase agreed to acquire First Republic after the bank was seized by financial regulators early on Monday, a deal that came after weekend-long efforts to rescue the regional lender...
JPMorgan Chase Buys Majority Of First Republic Bank From FDIC
https://www.nasdaq.com › articles › jpmorgan-chase-buys-majority-of-first-republic-bank-from-fdic
TodayThe acquired First Republic businesses will be overseen by JPMorgan's Consumer and Community Banking or CCB Co-CEOs, Marianne Lake and Jennifer Piepszak. As of April 13, First Republic Bank had ...
JPMorgan Chase Buys First Republic After FDIC Seizure: Is the Banking ...
https://www.fool.com › investing › 2023 › 05 › 01 › jpmorgan-buys-first-republic-banking-crisis-over
TodayJPMorgan Chase Buys First Republic After FDIC Seizure: Is the Banking Crisis Over? | The Motley Fool Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Search Log InHelp...
JPMorgan buys First Republic: Bank shares rise as deal reached
https://www.foxbusiness.com › markets › jpmorgan-buys-first-republic-bank-shares-rise-deal-reached
TodayShares of the major U.S. banks are in the green after JPMorgan Chase announced that it would pay $10.6 billion to the FDIC to buy most of First Republic Bank's assets.
JPMorgan Chase acquires substantial majority of assets and assumes ...
https://www.jpmorganchase.com › ir › news › 2023 › jpmc-acquires-substantial-majority-of-assets-and-assumes-certain-liabilities-of-first-republic-bank
TodayNew York, May 1, 2023 - JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) today announced it has acquired the substantial majority of assets and assumed the deposits and certain other liabilities of First Republic Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
Searches related to jp morgan buys bank

when was jp morgan founded​
who founded jp morgan chase​
does jp morgan own citibank​
owner of jp morgan​
who owns chase manhattan bank​
who is jp morgan chase​
what does jp morgan own​
who owns chase bank now​

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=jp+morgan+buys+bank&ia=web


we bailed out the banks now jp morgan gets to buy banks for pennies, and keep it all.

socialized losses and privatized gains are fascism.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
translation: Guillermo picks up the gauntlet for another poster, yet he CANNOT meet a simple request regarding his initial assertion ... of which he just regurgitates here his personal interpretation of what TAG was thinking....NOT what in my links he can logically & factually prove to be "complete shit".

That's the problem with right wing/MAGA wonks .... was put on the spot to logically and factually explain/prover their SPECIFIC assertions, they instead double down on generalities, dodges and then project their own short comings on others. They only convince themselves and the jokers they see in the mirror,

The chronology of the posts exposes TDG's errors. Guillermo just adds bluff & buster to that failure. Typical of him, of which he now embellish in up coming posts.



No it doesn't. I read through the whole thing. Being grandiose doesn't make you right, you're not always wrong just wrong most of the time. Your "evidence" was unconvincing. There's a way to correct that, stop shit posting.

:rolleyes: Grow up Guilllermo, will ya please? Your saying it is a whole lot different than your proving it with supported documented, valid facts and the logic derived from said facts.. The chronology of the posts just make you and your brethren a bunch of MAGA suckers and doormats for Carlson....you're too proud to admit that. So much more to pity you.

You responded EXACTLY as I predicted. You're done, so have the last silly and predictable retort. Catch you on another thread
 
Try to send a child without a measles vaccine to public school, moron.

That isn't a mandate, retard.

I've already posted case law to you - did you forget that I crushed this talking point a week ago?

New York was arresting parents for Truancy for keeping their children out of public schools. The SCOTUS ruled parent HAVE THE RIGHT to keep children out of public schools if they object to vaccine requirements. It was a LOSS for mandates.

Idiot.
 
That isn't a mandate, retard.

I've already posted case law to you - did you forget that I crushed this talking point a week ago?

New York was arresting parents for Truancy for keeping their children out of public schools. The SCOTUS ruled parent HAVE THE RIGHT to keep children out of public schools if they object to vaccine requirements. It was a LOSS for mandates.

Idiot.

You are even dumber than you sound. Which public schools in NY can children attend without having a measles vaccine?
 
Back
Top