Arctic: Largest Increase In November Sea Ice Volume On Record

He's the UK version of the Right-Wing lunatic fringe! LOL!

Please- keep that guy OVER THERE! Blahahahaha!

We already have enough of these nutsacks!

That data comes from the Danish Meteorological Institute, pretty much all you have to say on the matter is plucked from your rear end. I have been patient with you so far, address the subject at hand or be banned, your choice.
 
He's the UK version of the Right-Wing lunatic fringe! LOL!

Please- keep that guy OVER THERE! Blahahahaha!

We already have enough of these nutsacks!

I am very far from right wing, but I feel no need to prove that to you. I will point out though that the scientific method is not interested in political correctness, contrived consensus, or voters. This shouldn't be news to you but apparently is. Let me ask you this question, which of the four Representative Concentration Pathways, outlined in the IPCC AR5 report, do you consider the most likely?
 
Last edited:
I am very far from right wing, but I feel no need to prove that to you. I will point out though that the scientific method is not interested in political correctness, contrived consensus, or voters. This shouldn't be news to you but apparently is. Let me ask you this question, which of the four Representative Concentration Pathways, outlined in the IPCC AR5 report, do you consider the most likely?

Across all RCP's, why do you think one or some would be more likely than others!

Look across all RCP's, I believe the study indicates a rise in future Sea Levels, and a rise in Global Mean Temperature.

I think some of the study may be guesswork, because there is no real way to project that far into the future, not knowing how much coal vs. green energy sources the planet will be using in the future- not even in the 21st century- much less beyond that!

So which ones do you have a problem with?
 
Across all RCP's, why do you think one or some would be more likely than others!

Look across all RCP's, I believe the study indicates a rise in future Sea Levels, and a rise in Global Mean Temperature.

I think some of the study may be guesswork, because there is no real way to project that far into the future, not knowing how much coal vs. green energy sources the planet will be using in the future- not even in the 21st century- much less beyond that!

So which ones do you have a problem with?

Well for a start the values for ECS and TCR are going down all the time, as shown in the recent Curry-Lewis paper. If you need an explanation of the significance of this then please ask. To my mind RCP8.5 is impossible and RCP6.0 extremely unlikely.

https://climateaudit.org/2018/04/24...ake-data-on-estimates-of-climate-sensitivity/

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0667.1
 
science-squared-dt-600.jpg
 
Well for a start the values for ECS and TCR are going down all the time, as shown in the recent Curry-Lewis paper. If you need an explanation of the significance of this then please ask. To my mind RCP8.5 is impossible and RCP6.0 extremely unlikely.

https://climateaudit.org/2018/04/24...ake-data-on-estimates-of-climate-sensitivity/

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0667.1

Hey thanks, I appreciate your post! I give you credit for just reading the studies that are available. So many others come in here running their mouths, sprouting opinions based upon nothing more than a best guess, unprepared to speak on the subject.
 
Hey thanks, I appreciate your post! I give you credit for just reading the studies that are available. So many others come in here running their mouths, sprouting opinions based upon nothing more than a best guess, unprepared to speak on the subject.

I read lots of background material and am only interested in the science. Sadly climate science and politics have become intrinsically linked, for which I blame the pathetic media, climate activists and politicians. The recent National Climate Assessment is a case in point. It ruthlessly pursues the RCP8.5 scenario because it is most likely to engender alarmist headlines in the subservient media ahead of COP24. You are all being played, it is a well trodden path that been going on for decades.
 
Back
Top