Are Americans dumb?

Aoxomoxoa said:
How did you answer the question about the Moon landings, maybe I am slow so let me put it as simply as possible. Did man land on the Moon? Yes or no will suffice. As for the power down, you haven't explained why the North Tower behaved exactly like the South Tower.
Click to expand...

Looks to me like man landed on the moon, but who knows? Show me why you're skeptical and I'll revisit my decision.

I won't explain why the North Tower behaved like the South Tower. What is clear and obvious to any observer is that they did behave exactly the same. If you want that explanation, I suggest you seek out the explanation, as I have.
 
Rana said:
You laugh, I don't think it is funny, I think it is scary. We are suppose to be the most advanced military complex on the planet, but our response on that day was pathetic to say the least.
Click to expand...

Yes and the military is prepped and ready to go against outside threats. It was not designed for an inside attack like that which occurred on 9/11. Again, I can think up 100 scenarios that would require a strong military presence on our borders to prevent. I can think up another 100 that would require a military presence at all large gathering places in order for them to prevent. It is unrealistic to expect them to cover every possible scenario that can be thought up. They have to cover the most likely threats.
 
Bijou said:
Looks to me like man landed on the moon, but who knows? Show me why you're skeptical and I'll revisit my decision.

I won't explain why the North Tower behaved like the South Tower. What is clear and obvious to any observer is that they did behave exactly the same. If you want that explanation, I suggest you seek out the explanation, as I have.
Click to expand...

What is wrong with you? I never said I was sceptical, I just wanted to know your view. You were the one that said there was a power down in the South Tower which was a cover for the real reason but you're unable to explain why the North Tower collapsed in the same manner.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes, there was risk of hijacking. But up until 9/11, the hijackings never resulted in ramming the planes into buildings. Add in the fact that we hadn't had a domestic hijacking in about 30 years? The threat was always deemed to come from outside in. 9/11 changed that.
Click to expand...

Actually, the British warned the US back in 1999 that Al Queda was planning on using airplanes in an unconventional way.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes and the military is prepped and ready to go against outside threats. It was not designed for an inside attack like that which occurred on 9/11. Again, I can think up 100 scenarios that would require a strong military presence on our borders to prevent. I can think up another 100 that would require a military presence at all large gathering places in order for them to prevent. It is unrealistic to expect them to cover every possible scenario that can be thought up. They have to cover the most likely threats.
Click to expand...

Again, a giant failure on the part of our military to think that a threat could only come from outside, especially since the failed attempt on the towers during the Vlinton administration, and they also intel from the Brits.
 
Superfreak said:
Explain how the transcripts from the ATC show they lost contact with United 175 and didn't know where it was.

The explosions were explained, you choose not to accept anything that doesn't fit your conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

:0)

Dude, you're still incapable of answering a question a 3rd grader could answer.

You don't answer because it demonstrates what I've said from the very beginning .. that there is no science that supports the fairy-tale.

You don't answer because it demonstrates the IMPOSSIBILITY of what is claimed.

But at this point .. don't answer .. your RUNNING :0) has already said everything that need be.
 
Rana said:
Again, a giant failure on the part of our military to think that a threat could only come from outside, especially since the failed attempt on the towers during the Vlinton administration, and they also intel from the Brits.
Click to expand...

Again, a completely unrealistic expectation of yours for our military.
 
Damocles said:
It distracts from the horrible leadership of the current Administration and gets people arguing about something other than the fact of the incredible number of people who don't have jobs while the "Private Sector is Doing Fine"...
Click to expand...

I don't believe a word of all the controlled explosion theories but it is a lot harder to dismiss Robert Bowman as a crank. Which is why everybody chooses to ignore him.
 
Howey said:
Thanks. I meant to include that in my post.
Click to expand...

The response from NORAD or lack of has been the thing I think that has been down played. I have never understood this. I always thought before 9/11 that it was one of our best assets. I was wrong. It failed miserably on 9/11 and the response by most mirrored that of SF, as a result, who believes they will be able to protect us in the future?
 
Howey said:
No we don't. We think some Republicans are dumb and all Teabaggers are dumb for believing the Republican's line of BS.
Click to expand...
"Teabaggers" are leftist perverts.

Liberals want to destroy the private sector and put everyone on food stamps. The "dumbness" is a permanent lesion found deep in the Left's anal cavity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top