Your thread title makes no sense. trump cannot give someone a pardon for crimes he has not yet committed. Pardons are backwards looking, so only for past actions. In theory, trump could promise to give a pardon, if he is still in office when the pardon is needed, but he can not give a future pardon.Are blanket pardons before a crime is even committed acceptable?
trump could promise to pardon his children, or anyone else, for actions they commit in the future, but that would carry no legal weight until they committed the crimes, and got the pardon.They are now. Trump will now be able to create entire squadrons of untouchables to do his bidding as he sees fit. Democrats really should have thought this one through.
trump cannot give someone a pardon for crimes he has not yet committed.
No, he did not. He issued pardons that were before they went on trial, not pardons before they committed a crime.Joe Biden issued preemptive pardons for several individuals, including prominent critics of Donald Trump and members of his own family.
Biden pardoned people before they were convicted, not before they committed the actions they could be convicted of. I am sorry you do not understand the difference, but it is a real difference.Yes he did, Salty Walty.
Biden issues preemptive pardons
Biden pardoned people before they were convicted, not before they committed the actions they could be convicted of. I am sorry you do not understand the difference, but it is a real difference.
Remember when Biden said that "if" Trump preemptively pardoned his staff or family it would set a bad precedent and that he would never do it? Pepperidge Farm remembers...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyfTheTpBEk
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The Democrat Party is all about projection. Whatever they are doing, or considering doing, they accuse the other side of doing....
Never was. Pardoning someone that has not been convicted is senseless, and doesn't protect anybody.They are now. Trump will now be able to create entire squadrons of untouchables to do his bidding as he sees fit. Democrats really should have thought this one through.
FTFYYour thread title makes no sense. Biden cannot give someone a pardon for crimes he has not yet committed.
Not possible. You cannot pardon someone that has not yet been convicted. It's meaningless. Such preemptive 'pardons' protect no one.Biden pardoned people before they were convicted,
Constitutional America is over....the Overlords do whatever they fuck they want to do.
Indeed, I do. They are not merely lying halfwits, but massive hypocrites who ate everything they accuse others of being.Remember when Biden said that "if" Trump preemptively pardoned his staff or family it would set a bad precedent and that he would never do it? Pepperidge Farm remembers...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyfTheTpBEk
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The Democrat Party is all about projection. Whatever they are doing, or considering doing, they accuse the other side of doing....
All the stuff that cant be used in our war in Ukraine because that would be irresponsible....that we have used in our war against the Russians....
Why one cannot argue with a mentally unstable leftist halfwit.Your thread title makes no sense. trump cannot give someone a pardon for crimes he has not yet committed. Pardons are backwards looking, so only for past actions. In theory, trump could promise to give a pardon, if he is still in office when the pardon is needed, but he can not give a future pardon.
Could you mean a blanket pardon for crimes they have not been convicted of yet? trump could give anyone a pardon for all federal crimes they committed up until the pardon.
trump could promise to pardon his children, or anyone else, for actions they commit in the future, but that would carry no legal weight until they committed the crimes, and got the pardon.
Even if trump could and did deliver on the promised pardons, they would not be untouchable. trump can only pardon them for federal crimes. Much of the crimes are state crimes.
Let's say donny junior decides to murder the bishop in Maryland, then his daddy can't save him. But if donny junior murders the bishop in DC, a federal territory, then his daddy can save him.
No, he did not. He issued pardons that were before they went on trial, not pardons before they committed a crime.
If Fauci shot someone before the pardon, and it was found out later, the pardon stands. If Fauci shoots someone today, he would need trump to pardon him.
Do you see how that works?
.....and accepting them can be viewed as an admission of guilt.Never was. Pardoning someone that has not been convicted is senseless, and doesn't protect anybody.