Are Democrats still supporting importation of Foreign Labor?

Jack

Verified User
Just a Question.
With so many Americans Out of Work.
And this coronavirus so easily spread.
Are Democrats still pushing the same Immigration Policy?

Now, Saudiberg has exclaimed that Americans don't want to do the 'Dirty Work', and that type of Menial Work should be done by Peasants from Third World Countries ... like what they do in Saudi Arabia.
My counter argument is that the Saudis have a nationalized oil industry and can afford to subsidize their Citizens.

So, is that the Plan? Will the Government subsidize the American Citizen from here on out?
And, ... where's all the Money coming from?
 
Just a Question.
With so many Americans Out of Work.
And this coronavirus so easily spread.
Are Democrats still pushing the same Immigration Policy?

Now, Saudiberg has exclaimed that Americans don't want to do the 'Dirty Work', and that type of Menial Work should be done by Peasants from Third World Countries ... like what they do in Saudi Arabia.
My counter argument is that the Saudis have a nationalized oil industry and can afford to subsidize their Citizens.

So, is that the Plan? Will the Government subsidize the American Citizen from here on out?
And, ... where's all the Money coming from?

With the borders closed, and almost all the naturalization system closed, at first it seemed to make little difference that trump had stopped the issuing of Green Cards. There were so few Green Cards being issued, why should it matter? It turns out the Green Cards being issued were extreme cases where it was obvious a Green Card should be issued. Working papers for a doctor, or viral researcher. Paperwork for a returning American veteran. These were only the cases that were absolutely important and agreed upon.

In bad times like this, we should be more eager for immigrants who can solve health problems, and create jobs. We should be interested in keeping families together, and working out which nation people should be citizens of. There are many people raised in America, who should have American citizenship.

The spread of disease is about people moving. People who have been here for decades are not moving.

As for menial work, we have to ask whether Americans can do it at a cost effective price, but also whether it is worth doing. If fruit pays too little to be picked by Americans, maybe the solution is America gets out of the fruit industry.
 
With the borders closed, and almost all the naturalization system closed, at first it seemed to make little difference that trump had stopped the issuing of Green Cards. There were so few Green Cards being issued, why should it matter? It turns out the Green Cards being issued were extreme cases where it was obvious a Green Card should be issued. Working papers for a doctor, or viral researcher. Paperwork for a returning American veteran. These were only the cases that were absolutely important and agreed upon.

In bad times like this, we should be more eager for immigrants who can solve health problems, and create jobs. We should be interested in keeping families together, and working out which nation people should be citizens of. There are many people raised in America, who should have American citizenship.

The spread of disease is about people moving. People who have been here for decades are not moving.

As for menial work, we have to ask whether Americans can do it at a cost effective price, but also whether it is worth doing. If fruit pays too little to be picked by Americans, maybe the solution is America gets out of the fruit industry.

Would it be too much to ask for a source?

There's your answer Jackov, of course Democrats support immigrants over Americans. What, are ya a fucking retard or something?
 
With the borders closed, and almost all the naturalization system closed, at first it seemed to make little difference that trump had stopped the issuing of Green Cards. There were so few Green Cards being issued, why should it matter? It turns out the Green Cards being issued were extreme cases where it was obvious a Green Card should be issued. Working papers for a doctor, or viral researcher. Paperwork for a returning American veteran. These were only the cases that were absolutely important and agreed upon.

In bad times like this, we should be more eager for immigrants who can solve health problems, and create jobs. We should be interested in keeping families together, and working out which nation people should be citizens of. There are many people raised in America, who should have American citizenship.

The spread of disease is about people moving. People who have been here for decades are not moving.

As for menial work, we have to ask whether Americans can do it at a cost effective price, but also whether it is worth doing. If fruit pays too little to be picked by Americans, maybe the solution is America gets out of the fruit industry.

I support NOT importing Third World Labor into the US.
 
Just a Question.
With so many Americans Out of Work.
And this coronavirus so easily spread.
Are Democrats still pushing the same Immigration Policy?

Now, Saudiberg has exclaimed that Americans don't want to do the 'Dirty Work', and that type of Menial Work should be done by Peasants from Third World Countries ... like what they do in Saudi Arabia.
My counter argument is that the Saudis have a nationalized oil industry and can afford to subsidize their Citizens.

So, is that the Plan? Will the Government subsidize the American Citizen from here on out?
And, ... where's all the Money coming from?

So far, I haven't seen any Democrat argue against the current open borders party line. So yeah, they're still willing to drag down American wages for the glory of Globalism.
 
So far, I haven't seen any Democrat argue against the current open borders party line. So yeah, they're still willing to drag down American wages for the glory of Globalism.

There is no open borders agenda. If anyone thinks there is than they don't know what open borders actually means.
 
There is no open borders agenda. If anyone thinks there is than they don't know what open borders actually means.

The Democrats don't want to deport illegals and they want illegals to have healthcare.
They may not use the term "open borders" but that's what this essentially is.
 
So far, I haven't seen any Democrat argue against the current open borders party line. So yeah, they're still willing to drag down American wages for the glory of Globalism.

I can actually envision both Dems and Repubs support a 'Saudi Plan' where Third World Labor is allowed in to do certain Labor.
The excuse will be that 'Americans don't want to do that kind of Work'.

It won't be for the 'Glory of Globalization'.
It will be because it would cost too much to pay Americans to do the Work.
 
I can actually envision both Dems and Repubs support a 'Saudi Plan' where Third World Labor is allowed in to do certain Labor.
The excuse will be that 'Americans don't want to do that kind of Work'.

It won't be for the 'Glory of Globalization'.
It will be because it would cost too much to pay Americans to do the Work.

For Capitalists, that's the real reason. They don't actually believe in that "melting pot" bullshit, they just want cheap labor. But after decades upon decades of globalist propaganda, it's easier to tell people that diversity is our strength, so bringing in more immigrants is actually good for everyone.
 
For Capitalists, that's the real reason. They don't actually believe in that "melting pot" bullshit, they just want cheap labor. But after decades upon decades of globalist propaganda, it's easier to tell people that diversity is our strength, so bringing in more immigrants is actually good for everyone.

SBS: "For Capitalists, that's the real reason."
Jack: Agreed.

SBS: "They don't actually believe in that "melting pot" bullshit, they just want cheap labor."
Jack: Agreed.

SBS: "But after decades upon decades of globalist propaganda, it's easier to tell people that diversity is our strength, so bringing in more immigrants is actually good for everyone."
Jack: It seems to be working. Even the Democrats (who used to be the Party of the Working Class) are throwing the American Worker under the bus.
 
We can thank (((a certain semitic tribe))) for that.

It seems to be a group effort by those that have the Wealth.
One of the 'beauties' of Capitalism, ... is that you don't have to be Black, White, Yellow, or Brown. 'Green' is the only color that counts.
 
It seems to be a group effort by those that have the Wealth.
One of the 'beauties' of Capitalism, ... is that you don't have to be Black, White, Yellow, or Brown. 'Green' is the only color that counts.

Every country has greedy Capitalists, but Nationalism works as a check on Capitalism. Capitalism is out of control in the West because the Jewish media killed Nationalism.
 
Every country has greedy Capitalists, but Nationalism works as a check on Capitalism. Capitalism is out of control in the West because the Jewish media killed Nationalism.

I don't believe that. Capitalism works best with as many Consumers as possible. Western Capitalists sold their Souls to have a chance at the 1.5 BILLION Chinese Consumers.
 
I don't believe that. Capitalism works best with as many Consumers as possible. Western Capitalists sold their Souls to have a chance at the 1.5 BILLION Chinese Consumers.

But outside of the West, Capitalists haven't been able to get their countries to have open borders. Capitalists were able to do this in the West, but only after Jews took over the media and academia then promoted White Guilt and Globalism.
 
But outside of the West, Capitalists haven't been able to get their countries to have open borders. Capitalists were able to do this in the West, but only after Jews took over the media and academia then promoted White Guilt and Globalism.

Capitalists were the ones that created the Virginia Company that founded Jamestown and Plymouth. Many were Freemasons and didn't have a religious agenda. They were interested in making money.

"Virginia Company
The Virginia Company refers collectively to two joint-stock companies chartered under James I on April 10, 1606 with the goal of establishing settlements on the coast of America. The two companies are referred to as the "Virginia Company of London" and the "Virginia Company of Plymouth", and they operated with identical charters in different territories.Wikipedia"
 
Capitalists were the ones that created the Virginia Company that founded Jamestown and Plymouth. Many were Freemasons and didn't have a religious agenda. They were interested in making money.

"Virginia Company
The Virginia Company refers collectively to two joint-stock companies chartered under James I on April 10, 1606 with the goal of establishing settlements on the coast of America. The two companies are referred to as the "Virginia Company of London" and the "Virginia Company of Plymouth", and they operated with identical charters in different territories.Wikipedia"

But because Americans were still Ethnic Nationalists at the time, this didn't lead to mass immigration from the third world.

It's also important to mention that not all rich business-owners are total Nihilists when it comes to their country. It's like that now because America is multiracial and doesn't have a national identity anymore. The death of Nationalism in the West has left people defenseless against Capitalism, but it's also created more of those soulless Capitalists who don't care about anything but making more money.
 
But because Americans were still Ethnic Nationalists at the time, this didn't lead to mass immigration from the third world.

It's also important to mention that not all rich business-owners are total Nihilists when it comes to their country. It's like that now because America is multiracial and doesn't have a national identity anymore. The death of Nationalism in the West has left people defenseless against Capitalism, but it's also created more of those soulless Capitalists who don't care about anything but making more money.

"The Royal African Company - Supplying Slaves to Jamestown"
https://www.nps.gov/jame/learn/hist...can-company-supplying-slaves-to-jamestown.htm

"As early as 1618, King James I had granted a patent to a company that wanted to trade for gold and precious woods in Africa. Other groups also received rights to trade in Africa, but never dealt with slaves in any major way. English involvement in the slave trade would intensify after 1663, when a new patent was issued to the Company of Royal Adventurers. England had realized the money to be made trading slaves to the West Indies and Virginia. By 1668, over a quarter of the new company’s profits was derived from the slave trade."
 
Back
Top