Are you concerned about replacement?

Mina said:
I thought you were saying you realized you hadn't answered it.



So, it really provides some context around her decision to leave. She was in a tough, thankless job and had already stuck it out longer than anyone had managed to do for decades.
Click to expand...

and was under fire for conspiring against one of the candidates during the primaries........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
we're ready to replace Biden......
Click to expand...

Lucky you.

5dhpx7.jpg
5liv0q.jpg
 
Walt said:
Several billion people have been lifted out of poverty. Western norms are being set into world norms... Kind of. And you can get really cheap stuff at Walmart. Globalism is not all bad.

Napoleon was a dictator who expanded out the idea of citizenship and freedom to all of Europe. After him, everyone in Europe had to at least pay lip service to freedom. That is what has happened to the world recently.
Click to expand...

This has all come at the cost of the destruction of the American worker and American family, the only ones who are expected to suffer under globalism are the American middle class, but hey we can get cheap consumer goods by propping up the CCP and their one belt one road global hegemon strategy.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sure....that's why she thought she could get away with taking the choice away from demmycrat voters........
Click to expand...

As you'll recall, the choice wasn't taken away from the Democratic voters. Compare to the 2020 Republican primary process, for example. In 2020, a number of states canceled their primaries entirely, to avoid having Republican voters reject Trump. The party also opted not to hold even a single debate, so that Trump couldn't be embarrassed by the smarter Republicans he was running against. And even a number of the states holding primaries had them delayed, to make sure no competitor would have time to build up momentum. They also swapped some states to winner-takes-all delegate systems, so that even if a competitor wound up with a strong minority of support, they wouldn't have any delegates at the convention to make anti-Trump noise. That's what it looks like when party officials want to take the choice away from voters. By comparison, in 2016, on the Democratic side, Sanders was allowed on all the ballots (despite not even being a Democrat), and he had access to a large number of debates, and all the voting went on as normal. Unfortunately for Sanders, it turns out Democratic primary voters liked Clinton better.... which, again, shouldn't be a huge surprise, since Sanders wasn't actually a Democrat and Clinton was.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
:laugh:

I smell RW urine. Do you smell RW urine?
Click to expand...

Pooling under their chair at their keyboards. Did you see the fantasy about immediately impeaching Harris, skipping her VP and going right to the Speaker after the Republicans retake the House?

Speaking of which, who would be a good VP? Buttiege? Austin? Blinken?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
For having a (D) after her name. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The fuckwit doesn't realize that even if the Republicans take over both the House and the Senate, the results of an impeachment would be the same as those of Clinton and Trump....for exactly the same reasons.

All the Republicans would accomplish is making them look as fucked up as JPPs RWNJ fuckwits.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Pooling under their chair at their keyboards. Did you see the fantasy about immediately impeaching Harris, skipping her VP and going right to the Speaker after the Republicans retake the House?

Speaking of which, who would be a good VP? Buttiege? Austin? Blinken?
Click to expand...

I think Buttigieg would be awesome. So six years with Harris, then eight more with Pete. We could really make some excellent progress for this nation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top