Are you happy about people who beat cops being pardoned?

Is reading hard for you? From the link...

Both men were eventually acquitted of Gibson's murder by a federal jury, but they were convicted on the drug charges.
You're a liar.
 
I just did.
You're a liar.
I just did.
 
You're a liar.

Fox News. :rolleyes:
 
We haven't even got to the embarrassing claims you made in the fourth paragraph. You might want to do some actual research next time.

Thoughts based on false facts aren't worth much. When you reach conclusions based on hope and denial and not reality, you are more than likely going to reach the wrong conclusion. I haven't proclaimed education. I am just smart enough to know when I don't know things so I try to find out the facts. Then I have learned that trying to fit the facts to a desired conclusion are likely to result in failure.
Dude, you're a loser on a loser mission.
Only you can fix that. :dunno:
 
93f28353132286b3e166c3fff171abbc.jpg
You are presenting a subtle grammatical argument, that is just wrong. Basically, the claim is that because a sentence is supposed to be a complete thought, it contains only one attack. If there is a non-ad hominem attack in the sentence, it assumes that ad hominem attacks are in some way negated.

There can be multiple attacks in a single sentence, and those attacks can be a mix of ad hominem and non-ad hominem attacks. I can even mix support with ad hominem attacks. An example would be to say, "you are right about your argument, but you are still a Nazi slut."
 
You are presenting a subtle grammatical argument, that is just wrong. Basically, the claim is that because a sentence is supposed to be a complete thought, it contains only one attack. If there is a non-ad hominem attack in the sentence, it assumes that ad hominem attacks are in some way negated.

There can be multiple attacks in a single sentence, and those attacks can be a mix of ad hominem and non-ad hominem attacks. I can even mix support with ad hominem attacks. An example would be to say, "you are right about your argument, but you are still a Nazi slut."
5d96c1.jpg


And, you clearly don't understand the difference.
 
Dude, you're a loser on a loser mission.
Only you can fix that. :dunno:
Says the guy that believes things to be true when they clearly aren't true.

I'm still waiting for a name of the person associated with Jan 6 that was held in jail for more than a year without being charged with a crime.
Can you provide that name yet? Do you still believe such a person exists?
 
Back
Top